<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Cancels Their Click-To-Call&#8230;Maybe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Italia SW &#187; Archivio &#187; Il blog di Google Blog &#232; stato &#34;vittima&#34; di un Hacker</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-26099</link>
		<dc:creator>Italia SW &#187; Archivio &#187; Il blog di Google Blog &#232; stato &#34;vittima&#34; di un Hacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-26099</guid>
		<description>[...] Google has finalmente ammesso che la cancellazione del post Click-To-Call&#160; avvenuto nella giornata di ieri Ã¨ stato realizzato da un&#160;hacker. Bene, non si riferiscono alla persona come un hacker ma la chiamano &#8220;utente non autorizzato&#8221; (Ã¨ quantomeno carino non&#160;definire la persona che ha avuto l&#8217;accesso non autorizzato col termine appropriato ma, resta il fatto che sono stati vittima di un hacker..) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has finalmente ammesso che la cancellazione del post Click-To-Call&nbsp; avvenuto nella giornata di ieri Ã¨ stato realizzato da un&nbsp;hacker. Bene, non si riferiscono alla persona come un hacker ma la chiamano &#8220;utente non autorizzato&#8221; (Ã¨ quantomeno carino non&nbsp;definire la persona che ha avuto l&#8217;accesso non autorizzato col termine appropriato ma, resta il fatto che sono stati vittima di un hacker..) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtissthompson</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-26033</link>
		<dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-26033</guid>
		<description>Google has posted a retraction, explaining the post &lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/about-that-fake-post.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has posted a retraction, explaining the post <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/about-that-fake-post.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publishers Thank Google for Book Saleseldavojohn writes &#8220;A few book -- Centplus Tech</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25994</link>
		<dc:creator>Publishers Thank Google for Book Saleseldavojohn writes &#8220;A few book -- Centplus Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 07:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25994</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Cancels Their Click-To-Call Maybe?Google has apparently canceled their Click-To-Call feature according to a blog &#8230; I got the screenshot above from Google Blogoscoped and it shows how you &#8230; More information on how it works can be found in the Google Help section. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Cancels Their Click-To-Call Maybe?Google has apparently canceled their Click-To-Call feature according to a blog &#8230; I got the screenshot above from Google Blogoscoped and it shows how you &#8230; More information on how it works can be found in the Google Help section. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25992</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 04:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25992</guid>
		<description>Yep, looks like they removed it from their "Recent Posts" in their sidebar as well. I think you're right that it only sounds reasonable that it was a premature leak. That would probably be the reason that they haven't announced what happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, looks like they removed it from their &#8220;Recent Posts&#8221; in their sidebar as well. I think you&#8217;re right that it only sounds reasonable that it was a premature leak. That would probably be the reason that they haven&#8217;t announced what happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtissthompson</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25991</link>
		<dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 03:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25991</guid>
		<description>Looks like the &lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google Blog&lt;/a&gt; removed the post from the RSS as well now.  Though it looks like it was fake, it could have also been speculation, or even an early announcement that was posted.  I can't see why Google hasn't officially come out and posted a retraction, explaining all this, unless maybe this was a premature leak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Google Blog</a> removed the post from the RSS as well now.  Though it looks like it was fake, it could have also been speculation, or even an early announcement that was posted.  I can&#8217;t see why Google hasn&#8217;t officially come out and posted a retraction, explaining all this, unless maybe this was a premature leak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtissthompson</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25990</link>
		<dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 01:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/07/google-cancels-their-click-to-callmaybe/#comment-25990</guid>
		<description>Here is a &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/curtissthompson/263410063/" rel="nofollow"&gt;screenshot &lt;/a&gt;I took after I Ryan pointed out to me that my &lt;a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_Cancels_Click_to_Call_Project" rel="nofollow"&gt;Digg submission&lt;/a&gt; link to the blog post, was deleted immediately after submission.  The follow up links that I posted in the comments on the submission are those provided to me by Ryan (Thanks btw).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/curtissthompson/263410063/" rel="nofollow">screenshot </a>I took after I Ryan pointed out to me that my <a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_Cancels_Click_to_Call_Project" rel="nofollow">Digg submission</a> link to the blog post, was deleted immediately after submission.  The follow up links that I posted in the comments on the submission are those provided to me by Ryan (Thanks btw).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
