<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL&#8217;s Free Active Virus Shield Ditches Kaspersky for McAfee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123273</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123273</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-123257" rel="nofollow"&gt;Marah Marie wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;@netster0007x

“You could probably get the AOL active virus shield installer off of torrents or p2p, too.”

No, you couldn’t. At least not a month ago. I haven’t checked lately.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
It's all over the Internet on download sites, such as Download.com:
http://www.download.com/AOL-Active-Virus-Shield/3000-2239_4-10568703.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-123257" rel="nofollow">Marah Marie wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>@netster0007x</p>
<p>“You could probably get the AOL active virus shield installer off of torrents or p2p, too.”</p>
<p>No, you couldn’t. At least not a month ago. I haven’t checked lately.
</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s all over the Internet on download sites, such as Download.com:<br />
<a href="http://www.download.com/AOL-Active-Virus-Shield/3000-2239_4-10568703.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.download.com/AOL-Ac.....68703.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marah Marie</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123257</link>
		<dc:creator>Marah Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123257</guid>
		<description>@netster0007x

"You could probably get the AOL active virus shield installer off of torrents or p2p, too."

No, you couldn't. At least not a month ago. I haven't checked lately.

"AVS still a no go. Which of those 2 is lower recourse use?"

I've tried AOL's rebranded Kaspersky engine, Avast!, and AVG, in addition to being a Norton user until early 2006. AVG is the *only* anti-virus product out of those that doesn't suck up resources and slow down my older computer. AVG is the way to go if keeping resources freed up and the computer speedy is a top priority for you, as it is for me. Not to mention AVG's real-time protection is awesome, which is important if you use P2P and/or BT.

I've also tried both Comodo and Sygate Free firewalls and both are easy on resources and let the computer stay pretty brisk. I prefer Comodo lately and set it to the Custom level of protection; it seems like a more professional, up-to-date, comprehensive program than Sygate's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@netster0007x</p>
<p>&#8220;You could probably get the AOL active virus shield installer off of torrents or p2p, too.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, you couldn&#8217;t. At least not a month ago. I haven&#8217;t checked lately.</p>
<p>&#8220;AVS still a no go. Which of those 2 is lower recourse use?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried AOL&#8217;s rebranded Kaspersky engine, Avast!, and AVG, in addition to being a Norton user until early 2006. AVG is the *only* anti-virus product out of those that doesn&#8217;t suck up resources and slow down my older computer. AVG is the way to go if keeping resources freed up and the computer speedy is a top priority for you, as it is for me. Not to mention AVG&#8217;s real-time protection is awesome, which is important if you use P2P and/or BT.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also tried both Comodo and Sygate Free firewalls and both are easy on resources and let the computer stay pretty brisk. I prefer Comodo lately and set it to the Custom level of protection; it seems like a more professional, up-to-date, comprehensive program than Sygate&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123181</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123181</guid>
		<description>There are definitely alternate ways to get your hands on AOL Active Virus Shield, but it's understandable that you would rather choose a more supported app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are definitely alternate ways to get your hands on AOL Active Virus Shield, but it&#8217;s understandable that you would rather choose a more supported app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123122</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123122</guid>
		<description>You could probably get the AOL active virus shield installer off of torrents or p2p, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could probably get the AOL active virus shield installer off of torrents or p2p, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supercik</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123097</link>
		<dc:creator>Supercik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-123097</guid>
		<description>In my college, I remmmonded the computer machanicher to use AOL Active Virus Shield. After AOL AVS is not available, I recommended to use avira because it is top freeware. I you want a commercial software, use Kaspersky Antivirus 7.0. If you want a complete protection included anti-spakm, parentral control and so on, use zonealarm internet security 7. I refer to many website about a compariso between them. Zonealarm Internet Security Suite 7 is easy to use, good interface, based on Kaspersky Antivirus engine, top firewall and others. So use that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my college, I remmmonded the computer machanicher to use AOL Active Virus Shield. After AOL AVS is not available, I recommended to use avira because it is top freeware. I you want a commercial software, use Kaspersky Antivirus 7.0. If you want a complete protection included anti-spakm, parentral control and so on, use zonealarm internet security 7. I refer to many website about a compariso between them. Zonealarm Internet Security Suite 7 is easy to use, good interface, based on Kaspersky Antivirus engine, top firewall and others. So use that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-117394</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-117394</guid>
		<description>If I had to (or wanted to) pay I would use NOD32 as well. I like not having to worry about updating my subscriptions so I've stuck with Avast for several years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to (or wanted to) pay I would use NOD32 as well. I like not having to worry about updating my subscriptions so I&#8217;ve stuck with Avast for several years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-117318</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-117318</guid>
		<description>I've switched to Avast! for now.  Even before I saw AOL had switched software, I was finding Active Virus Shield often limiting my internet speeds to 300KB/s.  When I disabled Active Virus Shield, it'd shoot up to 1,200KB/s.  Wow.

If I were to pay, I'd go for NOD32.

I'm also giving Comodo Firewall a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve switched to Avast! for now.  Even before I saw AOL had switched software, I was finding Active Virus Shield often limiting my internet speeds to 300KB/s.  When I disabled Active Virus Shield, it&#8217;d shoot up to 1,200KB/s.  Wow.</p>
<p>If I were to pay, I&#8217;d go for NOD32.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also giving Comodo Firewall a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-114704</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-114704</guid>
		<description>AVS still a no go.  Which of those 2 is lower recourse use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AVS still a no go.  Which of those 2 is lower recourse use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-114577</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-114577</guid>
		<description>I'm still skeptical that their virus definitions have been discontinued. I don't see why they would still be updating the files on their FTP then?

I would use either Avast or AVG. I prefer Avast myself and have used that for quite some time, but AVG is pretty much just as good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still skeptical that their virus definitions have been discontinued. I don&#8217;t see why they would still be updating the files on their FTP then?</p>
<p>I would use either Avast or AVG. I prefer Avast myself and have used that for quite some time, but AVG is pretty much just as good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-114566</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-114566</guid>
		<description>OK, Active Virus shield no longer updates :(
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1242/1300704503_d134aa6708_o.jpg

What's the fastest, safe, low recourse use, free alternative for XP (I know we've discussed this b4 but I can't find it)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Active Virus shield no longer updates <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<a href="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1242/1300704503_d134aa6708_o.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://farm2.static.flickr.com.....6708_o.jpg</a></p>
<p>What&#8217;s the fastest, safe, low recourse use, free alternative for XP (I know we&#8217;ve discussed this b4 but I can&#8217;t find it)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-113672</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-113672</guid>
		<description>I used AOL Active Shield b4, and I can guarantee that every one who use it b4 will had miss it. I would strongly suggest user not to install Avast and AVG, their virus signature are not up to date, and contains a lots of false positive. 

I had downloaded the new Mcafee ( AOL version) and use it, I must admit it that I still miss AOL Active Shield very much, because the Mcafee is not user friedly as AOL Active Shield. 

I will download the new Kaspersky Antivirus 7.0. Although it is just 1 month trial, but if you know how to edit the info in registry, you always can renew the 1 month trial. The trouble here is just u need to edit it every month.

For those users who are seeking for good Antivirus and yet dont want to paid a single cent on it, and yet got no idea how to make the paid Antivirus ( eg Kaspersky ) keep valid even the trial version expired, I would suggest that you use Antivir, Bitdefender 8.0 ( both are free ) I think these 2 free Antivirus software are the only freeware that can match the standard of those paid Antivirus. In fact it even better than some paid Antivirus. But pls take note that Bitdefender 8 scan engine might be slow !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used AOL Active Shield b4, and I can guarantee that every one who use it b4 will had miss it. I would strongly suggest user not to install Avast and AVG, their virus signature are not up to date, and contains a lots of false positive. </p>
<p>I had downloaded the new Mcafee ( AOL version) and use it, I must admit it that I still miss AOL Active Shield very much, because the Mcafee is not user friedly as AOL Active Shield. </p>
<p>I will download the new Kaspersky Antivirus 7.0. Although it is just 1 month trial, but if you know how to edit the info in registry, you always can renew the 1 month trial. The trouble here is just u need to edit it every month.</p>
<p>For those users who are seeking for good Antivirus and yet dont want to paid a single cent on it, and yet got no idea how to make the paid Antivirus ( eg Kaspersky ) keep valid even the trial version expired, I would suggest that you use Antivir, Bitdefender 8.0 ( both are free ) I think these 2 free Antivirus software are the only freeware that can match the standard of those paid Antivirus. In fact it even better than some paid Antivirus. But pls take note that Bitdefender 8 scan engine might be slow !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL replaces free Kasperky anti-virus software with McAfee &#124; Tech &#38; Gadget News</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-113145</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL replaces free Kasperky anti-virus software with McAfee &#124; Tech &#38; Gadget News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-113145</guid>
		<description>[...] [via CyberNet ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via CyberNet ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-113054</link>
		<dc:creator>seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-113054</guid>
		<description>AOL's Active Virus Shield was probably one of the best software deals ever, and probably the only AOL product I have ever used.

But McAfee isnt a deal at any price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL&#8217;s Active Virus Shield was probably one of the best software deals ever, and probably the only AOL product I have ever used.</p>
<p>But McAfee isnt a deal at any price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sridhar Katakam</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-113011</link>
		<dc:creator>Sridhar Katakam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-113011</guid>
		<description>only AOHell knows how to screw up things on a consistent basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only AOHell knows how to screw up things on a consistent basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112986</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112986</guid>
		<description>Yes, your signatures should continue to update because those are just provided by Kaspersky. I'm not sure if AOL required a renewal process though (like Avast requires that you re-register each year for free to keep your software up to date).

I would recommend Avast though, that is what I use the most. If you're looking for a paid version I would say that NOD32 is the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, your signatures should continue to update because those are just provided by Kaspersky. I&#8217;m not sure if AOL required a renewal process though (like Avast requires that you re-register each year for free to keep your software up to date).</p>
<p>I would recommend Avast though, that is what I use the most. If you&#8217;re looking for a paid version I would say that NOD32 is the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112982</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112982</guid>
		<description>I'm wondering if signatures will continue to update.  My last update was 8/7/07 (today) at 9:46:08AM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if signatures will continue to update.  My last update was 8/7/07 (today) at 9:46:08AM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spock1982</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112980</link>
		<dc:creator>spock1982</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112980</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-112971" rel="nofollow"&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;So, does anyone know off-hand some good low recourse, FREE antivirus programs?  I don’t think I want to go back to the one my ISP provided -Computer Associates EZ Antivirus (although it was better than Norton, the one that came pre-installed on my PC).&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]

I think you may want to give Avast a try. Others here have mentioned it and I agree that it is good solution that does not use a lot of resources, offers a good level of protection and best of all it is free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-112971" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>So, does anyone know off-hand some good low recourse, FREE antivirus programs?  I don’t think I want to go back to the one my ISP provided -Computer Associates EZ Antivirus (although it was better than Norton, the one that came pre-installed on my PC).</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I think you may want to give Avast a try. Others here have mentioned it and I agree that it is good solution that does not use a lot of resources, offers a good level of protection and best of all it is free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xpgeek</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112978</link>
		<dc:creator>xpgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112978</guid>
		<description>That SUCKS! Back to Avast I guess, no way in heck I using anything from McAfee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That SUCKS! Back to Avast I guess, no way in heck I using anything from McAfee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112971</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112971</guid>
		<description>AWH MAN!!!  You said we can continue to use the program.  Will the antivirus updates cease?  If not, all those people that look for ways to get live.com Email should put that on hold and try and find ways to get Active Virus Shield.

So, does anyone know off-hand some good low recourse, FREE antivirus programs?  I don't think I want to go back to the one my ISP provided -Computer Associates EZ Antivirus (although it was better than Norton, the one that came pre-installed on my PC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWH MAN!!!  You said we can continue to use the program.  Will the antivirus updates cease?  If not, all those people that look for ways to get live.com Email should put that on hold and try and find ways to get Active Virus Shield.</p>
<p>So, does anyone know off-hand some good low recourse, FREE antivirus programs?  I don&#8217;t think I want to go back to the one my ISP provided -Computer Associates EZ Antivirus (although it was better than Norton, the one that came pre-installed on my PC).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112968</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/08/07/aols-free-active-virus-shield-ditches-kaspersky-for-mcafee/#comment-112968</guid>
		<description>NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! I stated using the AOL one because it was backed by Kaspersky's scan engine, oh man I hope the one I have will keep updating and not be forced to update this one.  :o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! I stated using the AOL one because it was backed by Kaspersky&#8217;s scan engine, oh man I hope the one I have will keep updating and not be forced to update this one.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
