<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Ships Updates Early&#8230;or Late?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/#comment-114302</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 01:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/#comment-114302</guid>
		<description>I think the real reason Microsoft did this is show hackers that they aren't afraid to break away from their schedule to release some updates. Otherwise hackers would know exactly how much time they have before the next round of patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real reason Microsoft did this is show hackers that they aren&#8217;t afraid to break away from their schedule to release some updates. Otherwise hackers would know exactly how much time they have before the next round of patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/#comment-114286</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/#comment-114286</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'd say they are late too. I almost wonder why they didn't just wait until the next "Patch Tuesday."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d say they are late too. I almost wonder why they didn&#8217;t just wait until the next &#8220;Patch Tuesday.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/#comment-114259</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/#comment-114259</guid>
		<description>If None of these updates were critical, then why did M$ breakaway from their schedule. something's fishy  :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If None of these updates were critical, then why did M$ breakaway from their schedule. something&#8217;s fishy  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/#comment-114255</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/08/29/microsoft-ships-updates-earlyor-late/#comment-114255</guid>
		<description>My guess is that there are late because they are not "critical updates".

Microsoft doesn't like to break away from "Patch Tuesday" unless there is an urgent need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that there are late because they are not &#8220;critical updates&#8221;.</p>
<p>Microsoft doesn&#8217;t like to break away from &#8220;Patch Tuesday&#8221; unless there is an urgent need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
