<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CyberNotes: Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-132380</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-132380</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-132337" rel="nofollow"&gt;Rick R wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;To you Opera lovers…

Does Opera have a google bookmarks extension (ala gmarks)? Opera’s inability to easily allow me access to google bookmarks across any of my computers I’m on makes it no-go. As far as I’m aware they don’t even have a concept like “foxmarks’ which lets you synch your bookmarks to a central repository and keep all you computers in sync (I’m mostly on my mac, but sometimes on a linux box at home, and at work I’m on windows, I like having all my bookmarks easily all synched without having to think about it. Personally I like google bookmarks bc the tag concept makes the most sense to me.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Opera 9.5 (currently in Beta) has a feature similar to Foxmarks that is built-in. It synchronizes your bookmarks with their own server so that you are not relying on a third-party for storing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132337" rel="nofollow">Rick R wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>To you Opera lovers…</p>
<p>Does Opera have a google bookmarks extension (ala gmarks)? Opera’s inability to easily allow me access to google bookmarks across any of my computers I’m on makes it no-go. As far as I’m aware they don’t even have a concept like “foxmarks’ which lets you synch your bookmarks to a central repository and keep all you computers in sync (I’m mostly on my mac, but sometimes on a linux box at home, and at work I’m on windows, I like having all my bookmarks easily all synched without having to think about it. Personally I like google bookmarks bc the tag concept makes the most sense to me.)</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Opera 9.5 (currently in Beta) has a feature similar to Foxmarks that is built-in. It synchronizes your bookmarks with their own server so that you are not relying on a third-party for storing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick R</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-132337</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-132337</guid>
		<description>To you Opera lovers...

Does Opera have a google bookmarks extension (ala gmarks)? Opera's inability to easily allow me access to google bookmarks across any of my computers I'm on makes it no-go. As far as I'm aware they don't even have a concept like "foxmarks' which lets you synch your bookmarks to a central repository and keep all you computers in sync (I'm mostly on my mac, but sometimes on a linux box at home, and at work I'm on windows, I like having all my bookmarks easily all synched without having to think about it. Personally I like google bookmarks bc the tag concept makes the most sense to me.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To you Opera lovers&#8230;</p>
<p>Does Opera have a google bookmarks extension (ala gmarks)? Opera&#8217;s inability to easily allow me access to google bookmarks across any of my computers I&#8217;m on makes it no-go. As far as I&#8217;m aware they don&#8217;t even have a concept like &#8220;foxmarks&#8217; which lets you synch your bookmarks to a central repository and keep all you computers in sync (I&#8217;m mostly on my mac, but sometimes on a linux box at home, and at work I&#8217;m on windows, I like having all my bookmarks easily all synched without having to think about it. Personally I like google bookmarks bc the tag concept makes the most sense to me.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to fix the Firefox memory leak (Firefox hack) &#171; // Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-129379</link>
		<dc:creator>How to fix the Firefox memory leak (Firefox hack) &#171; // Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-129379</guid>
		<description>[...] List of popular extensions that have memory problems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] List of popular extensions that have memory problems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j a v a s o n / Recommended Firefox add-ons (extensions)</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-119174</link>
		<dc:creator>j a v a s o n / Recommended Firefox add-ons (extensions)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-119174</guid>
		<description>[...] references: Firefox Extensions Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes Reducing memory usage - Firefox Top 10 Firefox Extensions, and More   Post a comment &#8212; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] references: Firefox Extensions Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes Reducing memory usage - Firefox Top 10 Firefox Extensions, and More   Post a comment &mdash; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayush</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-117576</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-117576</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115853" rel="nofollow"&gt;Zac wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115570" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ayush wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;You can finally have tabs with behavior YOU like, not THEY think you will like…Virtually any aspect of tabbed browsing is tweakable.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Can you restore tabs ? :?:&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Yes, with Session Manager.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Minimize/Restore/Maximize  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115853" rel="nofollow">Zac wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115570" rel="nofollow">Ayush wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>You can finally have tabs with behavior YOU like, not THEY think you will like…Virtually any aspect of tabbed browsing is tweakable.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Can you restore tabs ? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_question.gif' alt=':?:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yes, with Session Manager.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Minimize/Restore/Maximize  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox: estensioni esose &#171; Gioxx&#8217;s Wall</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-117439</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox: estensioni esose &#171; Gioxx&#8217;s Wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-117439</guid>
		<description>[...] CyberNet News pubblica una lista di estensioni particolarmente esose che appesantiscono l&#8217;esecuzione e la corretta navigazione di Mozilla Firefox. Un post per presentarle con i pro &#38; contro citati dalla fonte ed una piccola nota del sottoscritto per poter rimediare ai problemi di &#8220;Memory leak&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CyberNet News pubblica una lista di estensioni particolarmente esose che appesantiscono l&#8217;esecuzione e la corretta navigazione di Mozilla Firefox. Un post per presentarle con i pro &amp; contro citati dalla fonte ed una piccola nota del sottoscritto per poter rimediare ai problemi di &#8220;Memory leak&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-09-24 &#171; Daily Links Posting</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-116038</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-09-24 &#171; Daily Links Posting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-116038</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes - CyberNet News (tags: firefox extension extensions bugs leak memory)      This entry was written by quanmengli and posted on September 24, 2007 at 8:21 pm and filed under Delicious. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.    &#171; links for&#160;2007-09-23 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes - CyberNet News (tags: firefox extension extensions bugs leak memory)      This entry was written by quanmengli and posted on September 24, 2007 at 8:21 pm and filed under Delicious. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.    &laquo; links for&nbsp;2007-09-23 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115853</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115853</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115570" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ayush wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;You can finally have tabs with behavior YOU like, not THEY think you will like…Virtually any aspect of tabbed browsing is tweakable.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Can you restore tabs ? :?: 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]

Yes, with Session Manager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115570" rel="nofollow">Ayush wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>You can finally have tabs with behavior YOU like, not THEY think you will like…Virtually any aspect of tabbed browsing is tweakable.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Can you restore tabs ? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_question.gif' alt=':?:' class='wp-smiley' />
</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yes, with Session Manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Reduce Firefox&#8217;s Memory Usage when Minimized &#171; Yaser&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115806</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Reduce Firefox&#8217;s Memory Usage when Minimized &#171; Yaser&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115806</guid>
		<description>[...] though is its memory usage. It is true that I&#8217;m using around 20 extensions (some of them can cause memory leaks and crashes), but consuming about 100 MB of memory while only 8 tabs are open is quite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] though is its memory usage. It is true that I&#8217;m using around 20 extensions (some of them can cause memory leaks and crashes), but consuming about 100 MB of memory while only 8 tabs are open is quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwelle.org &#187; FireFox slow, slower, too slow</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115647</link>
		<dc:creator>dwelle.org &#187; FireFox slow, slower, too slow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115647</guid>
		<description>[...] slow, and there are often sub-second hangups while typing in textareas and such. After re-visiting CyberNotes: Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes, I have disabled Google Browser Sync again &#8211; that had caused problems in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] slow, and there are often sub-second hangups while typing in textareas and such. After re-visiting CyberNotes: Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes, I have disabled Google Browser Sync again &#8211; that had caused problems in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayush</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115570</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;these features are just wasting HDD space and making setup larger.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Firefox's setup/space usage is large even without all those features :D 

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;ErrorZilla ... Can the Opera do the same?&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
yup. If the error page is a 404 page (generated by server) then you can use UserJS. If the page is generated by opera (standard opera error page) then you can edit your lang file to add links. And you can always edit menus/buttons to add these features .. &lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Down Them All&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
links panel :)

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;WebDeveloper add-on&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
http://operawiki.info/WebDevToolbar

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;You can finally have tabs with behavior YOU like, not THEY think you will like...Virtually any aspect of tabbed browsing is tweakable.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Can you restore tabs ? :?: 

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Did not seen anything comparable in Opera or as any sort of add-ons.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
because there is no need to use addons for those features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>these features are just wasting HDD space and making setup larger.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Firefox&#8217;s setup/space usage is large even without all those features <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>ErrorZilla &#8230; Can the Opera do the same?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>yup. If the error page is a 404 page (generated by server) then you can use UserJS. If the page is generated by opera (standard opera error page) then you can edit your lang file to add links. And you can always edit menus/buttons to add these features .. </p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Down Them All</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>links panel <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>WebDeveloper add-on</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p><a href="http://operawiki.info/WebDevToolbar" rel="nofollow">http://operawiki.info/WebDevToolbar</a></p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>You can finally have tabs with behavior YOU like, not THEY think you will like&#8230;Virtually any aspect of tabbed browsing is tweakable.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Can you restore tabs ? <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_question.gif' alt=':?:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115105" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Did not seen anything comparable in Opera or as any sort of add-ons.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>because there is no need to use addons for those features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metaholic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes - CyberNet News</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115215</link>
		<dc:creator>Metaholic &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes - CyberNet News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115215</guid>
		<description>[...] Permalink &#124; Source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Permalink | Source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where Is GoogleBot? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox Tip: If your Firefox browser is running slowly, &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115184</link>
		<dc:creator>Where Is GoogleBot? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox Tip: If your Firefox browser is running slowly, &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115184</guid>
		<description>[...] your Firefox browser is running slowly, check out CyberNet&#8217;s list of memory-leaking extensions to see if you&#8217;ve installed any of the extensions listed and if there&#8217;s a simple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your Firefox browser is running slowly, check out CyberNet&#8217;s list of memory-leaking extensions to see if you&#8217;ve installed any of the extensions listed and if there&#8217;s a simple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115150</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115150</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115107" rel="nofollow"&gt;Dude wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Argh, forgot to mention, Opera is proprietary blob. So it released only when (and if) Opera Software will decide to do so. And if they’ll decide do not release or do not support something, nobody can override this. As a reasonable consequence there is no Opera for my favorite OS (x64 Kubuntu) at all. Cool, isn’t it? These guys are still refusing to support x64 platforms. Why they’re thinking I will run legacy 32-bit binary blob? Nope, I will not. Fortunately there is native x64 port of my favorite Firefox though ;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Opera 9.5 Alpha is going to support the 64-bit platform, and the 64-bit version of Firefox I don't believe is officially done by Mozilla. I don't like to use browsers that aren't official.

And you made a lot of other good points in your previous post, but you should know that Opera does have web developer tools and completely customizable keyboard shortcuts and mouse gestures. So you can customize what happens, for instance, when you middle-click on a tab. I would say that it has everything Tab Mix Plus does.

Don't get me wrong...I use Firefox and Opera on a daily basis, but some of the things you mentioned Opera can indeed do. Most people just don't give it a fair shot and are rather quick to criticize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115107" rel="nofollow">Dude wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Argh, forgot to mention, Opera is proprietary blob. So it released only when (and if) Opera Software will decide to do so. And if they’ll decide do not release or do not support something, nobody can override this. As a reasonable consequence there is no Opera for my favorite OS (x64 Kubuntu) at all. Cool, isn’t it? These guys are still refusing to support x64 platforms. Why they’re thinking I will run legacy 32-bit binary blob? Nope, I will not. Fortunately there is native x64 port of my favorite Firefox though <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Opera 9.5 Alpha is going to support the 64-bit platform, and the 64-bit version of Firefox I don&#8217;t believe is officially done by Mozilla. I don&#8217;t like to use browsers that aren&#8217;t official.</p>
<p>And you made a lot of other good points in your previous post, but you should know that Opera does have web developer tools and completely customizable keyboard shortcuts and mouse gestures. So you can customize what happens, for instance, when you middle-click on a tab. I would say that it has everything Tab Mix Plus does.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230;I use Firefox and Opera on a daily basis, but some of the things you mentioned Opera can indeed do. Most people just don&#8217;t give it a fair shot and are rather quick to criticize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115113</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115113</guid>
		<description>I blogged about this a while back.

http://blog.genotrance.com/2006/12/17/unreasonable-firefox-memory-usage/

I still hit 200-300MB at times but that's cause I don't restart Firefox for days and run several tabs at a time, especially when I'm catching up on my feeds. IE is just as bad though, so the high memory usage seems to come with the territory...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blogged about this a while back.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.genotrance.com/2006/12/17/unreasonable-firefox-memory-usage/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.genotrance.com/200.....ory-usage/</a></p>
<p>I still hit 200-300MB at times but that&#8217;s cause I don&#8217;t restart Firefox for days and run several tabs at a time, especially when I&#8217;m catching up on my feeds. IE is just as bad though, so the high memory usage seems to come with the territory&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115107</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115107</guid>
		<description>Argh, forgot to mention, Opera is proprietary blob. So it released only when (and if) Opera Software will decide to do so. And if they'll decide do not release or do not support something, nobody can override this. As a reasonable consequence there is no Opera for my favorite OS (x64 Kubuntu) at all. Cool, isn't it? These guys are still refusing to support x64 platforms. Why they're thinking I will run legacy 32-bit binary blob? Nope, I will not. Fortunately there is native x64 port of my favorite Firefox though ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh, forgot to mention, Opera is proprietary blob. So it released only when (and if) Opera Software will decide to do so. And if they&#8217;ll decide do not release or do not support something, nobody can override this. As a reasonable consequence there is no Opera for my favorite OS (x64 Kubuntu) at all. Cool, isn&#8217;t it? These guys are still refusing to support x64 platforms. Why they&#8217;re thinking I will run legacy 32-bit binary blob? Nope, I will not. Fortunately there is native x64 port of my favorite Firefox though <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115105</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-115048" rel="nofollow"&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Opera has plenty of features.  Far more than I had w/ Fx even with extensions &lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
But Opera does has FIXED SET of features. And their "widgets" thingie is pretty lame since it does not allows to alter browser behavior in significant manner.

With Firefox it is up to YOU to pick features YOU need, not features "THEY" (browser authors) think you need. So you can enjoy bu using program. While there is fewer features by brute count, there will MUCH MORE features USED BY YOU when you selected add-ons yourself since you pick only what you need. What is the clue in features count if you do not need 'em? I do not need mail, irc or torrent in my browser, I have my favorite apps for these tasks and these features are just wasting HDD space and making setup larger.

As example of add-ons usefulness: there is ErrorZilla add-on for Firefox. When you hit dead site you do not have to see just a boring error message from browser. Instead, you given a choice. You can ping or traceroute server to get idea what's wrong. Or use Google cache or Wayback Machine to get web site back in cached state (better than NOTHING, right?). Can the Opera do the same? No? Phew, typing long thingies by hands for each dead URL is dumb and boring thing.

And I did not noticed anything comparable with AdBlock Plus - nice AdBlocker with updateable block-lists and which is so comfortable to use.

And there is no anything like DTA aka Down Them All - nice downloader which is able to download files via several connections at once and integrates into browser nice, so it can DL all files on current page, etc.

As well as no things like WebDeveloper add-on. You do not have to be a real developer though, this thing is nice for advanced users as well who wants to take browser under their own control and get funny swiss army knife for the web.

And NoScript add-on is sort of JavaScript "firewall".Opera has similar features but these are pretty limited compared to this thing.

And TabMixPlus is great.You can finally have tabs with behavior YOU like, not THEY think you will like.Actions on different clicks are configurable.As well as where tab closing button(s) are placed.Virtually any aspect of tabbed browsing is tweakable. Did not seen anything comparable in Opera or as any sort of add-ons.

Not to mention Opera has bunch of issues with web sites rendering of web sites.
At very least:
- JavaScript is Opera's permanent pain in the a$$.Opera treats sites in its own unique way but due to strange marketing it failed to get popular enough to get counted by webmasters worldwide.Some sites are looking pretty broken or some features are not working or malfunctioning.These which rely on JavaScript is first example
- As another bad thing, Opera does not supports non-integer relative positioning in CSS. So, if web master wants to place elements by relative sizes in percents... well, opera will ignore non-integer part of percents. Let's adimt that 1% on modern monitor is pretty decent value, usually between 10 to 16 pixels. So...if you like when www looks like if it was crafted by an axe and by the hammer, Opera is a right choice. Othervice ... try to ask webmasters, they will tell you what they think about Opera. Prepare to hear something non-printable though. Beware, you can hear foul language, 18+ only! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115048" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Opera has plenty of features.  Far more than I had w/ Fx even with extensions </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>But Opera does has FIXED SET of features. And their &#8220;widgets&#8221; thingie is pretty lame since it does not allows to alter browser behavior in significant manner.</p>
<p>With Firefox it is up to YOU to pick features YOU need, not features &#8220;THEY&#8221; (browser authors) think you need. So you can enjoy bu using program. While there is fewer features by brute count, there will MUCH MORE features USED BY YOU when you selected add-ons yourself since you pick only what you need. What is the clue in features count if you do not need &#8216;em? I do not need mail, irc or torrent in my browser, I have my favorite apps for these tasks and these features are just wasting HDD space and making setup larger.</p>
<p>As example of add-ons usefulness: there is ErrorZilla add-on for Firefox. When you hit dead site you do not have to see just a boring error message from browser. Instead, you given a choice. You can ping or traceroute server to get idea what&#8217;s wrong. Or use Google cache or Wayback Machine to get web site back in cached state (better than NOTHING, right?). Can the Opera do the same? No? Phew, typing long thingies by hands for each dead URL is dumb and boring thing.</p>
<p>And I did not noticed anything comparable with AdBlock Plus - nice AdBlocker with updateable block-lists and which is so comfortable to use.</p>
<p>And there is no anything like DTA aka Down Them All - nice downloader which is able to download files via several connections at once and integrates into browser nice, so it can DL all files on current page, etc.</p>
<p>As well as no things like WebDeveloper add-on. You do not have to be a real developer though, this thing is nice for advanced users as well who wants to take browser under their own control and get funny swiss army knife for the web.</p>
<p>And NoScript add-on is sort of JavaScript &#8220;firewall&#8221;.Opera has similar features but these are pretty limited compared to this thing.</p>
<p>And TabMixPlus is great.You can finally have tabs with behavior YOU like, not THEY think you will like.Actions on different clicks are configurable.As well as where tab closing button(s) are placed.Virtually any aspect of tabbed browsing is tweakable. Did not seen anything comparable in Opera or as any sort of add-ons.</p>
<p>Not to mention Opera has bunch of issues with web sites rendering of web sites.<br />
At very least:<br />
- JavaScript is Opera&#8217;s permanent pain in the a$$.Opera treats sites in its own unique way but due to strange marketing it failed to get popular enough to get counted by webmasters worldwide.Some sites are looking pretty broken or some features are not working or malfunctioning.These which rely on JavaScript is first example<br />
- As another bad thing, Opera does not supports non-integer relative positioning in CSS. So, if web master wants to place elements by relative sizes in percents&#8230; well, opera will ignore non-integer part of percents. Let&#8217;s adimt that 1% on modern monitor is pretty decent value, usually between 10 to 16 pixels. So&#8230;if you like when www looks like if it was crafted by an axe and by the hammer, Opera is a right choice. Othervice &#8230; try to ask webmasters, they will tell you what they think about Opera. Prepare to hear something non-printable though. Beware, you can hear foul language, 18+ only! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115097</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115097</guid>
		<description>I love that Opera supports MDI (Multiple Document Interface) so that you can tile and cascade the windows. I use that feature all of the time, and it's something I feel Firefox has always missed. Unfortunately Firefox would essentially have to be rewritten from scratch to support the same feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that Opera supports MDI (Multiple Document Interface) so that you can tile and cascade the windows. I use that feature all of the time, and it&#8217;s something I feel Firefox has always missed. Unfortunately Firefox would essentially have to be rewritten from scratch to support the same feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of Feeds - 22 links - lifehacks, blogging, facebook, firefox, productivity &#171; Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115084</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of Feeds - 22 links - lifehacks, blogging, facebook, firefox, productivity &#171; Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115084</guid>
		<description>[...] [FIREFOX] Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes (cybernetnews.com, 27 saves, 59 inbound links, 20 diggs) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [FIREFOX] Firefox Extensions cause Memory Leaks and Crashes (cybernetnews.com, 27 saves, 59 inbound links, 20 diggs) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poniendo a Firefox en forma &#171; Prisma Digital</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115080</link>
		<dc:creator>Poniendo a Firefox en forma &#171; Prisma Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 12:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/05/cybernotes-firefox-extensions-cause-memory-leaks-and-crashes/#comment-115080</guid>
		<description>[...] Uno a la página MozillaZine donde hay un listado de extensiones problemáticas y otro listado en Cybernet (en ambos explica el problema causado y la solución).  La cantidad de extensiones no debe exceder [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Uno a la página MozillaZine donde hay un listado de extensiones problemáticas y otro listado en Cybernet (en ambos explica el problema causado y la solución).  La cantidad de extensiones no debe exceder [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
