<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista SP1 Beta Download Available to Testers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: manu</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/#comment-117359</link>
		<dc:creator>manu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/#comment-117359</guid>
		<description>After I restarted my my system after installing these, I got a message saying that my copy of Vista was illegal and that I should buy my own copy. I couldn’t cancel that message, I could only go to the MS homepage and buy Vista.The only solution was to format and reinstall Vista.

I booted used Safe Mode, but that didn’t work either. Has MS disguised a “crack disabler” in one of these updates cause until now my PARADOX tool worked just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I restarted my my system after installing these, I got a message saying that my copy of Vista was illegal and that I should buy my own copy. I couldn’t cancel that message, I could only go to the MS homepage and buy Vista.The only solution was to format and reinstall Vista.</p>
<p>I booted used Safe Mode, but that didn’t work either. Has MS disguised a “crack disabler” in one of these updates cause until now my PARADOX tool worked just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/#comment-116277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/#comment-116277</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-116210" rel="nofollow"&gt;Michael Dobrofsky wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;All those “fixes” listed should’ve been “fixes” in the originally released product before it saw the light of day.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
I feel the same way to a point, but they can only do so much before making it widely available. Most people don't jump on board until after SP1 anyways, which was even the case with XP. So I wouldn't say anything is out of the ordinary right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-116210" rel="nofollow">Michael Dobrofsky wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>All those “fixes” listed should’ve been “fixes” in the originally released product before it saw the light of day.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I feel the same way to a point, but they can only do so much before making it widely available. Most people don&#8217;t jump on board until after SP1 anyways, which was even the case with XP. So I wouldn&#8217;t say anything is out of the ordinary right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dobrofsky</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/#comment-116210</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dobrofsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/#comment-116210</guid>
		<description>All those "fixes" listed should've been "fixes" in the originally released product before it saw the light of day.

P.S. Love the screenshot. "There are no Ultimate Extras available"

MS must be laughing at those who bought Ultimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All those &#8220;fixes&#8221; listed should&#8217;ve been &#8220;fixes&#8221; in the originally released product before it saw the light of day.</p>
<p>P.S. Love the screenshot. &#8220;There are no Ultimate Extras available&#8221;</p>
<p>MS must be laughing at those who bought Ultimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista SP1 Beta Released to Testers</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/#comment-116158</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista SP1 Beta Released to Testers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/25/vista-sp1-beta-download-available-to-testers/#comment-116158</guid>
		<description>[...] [Via: Vista Blog and CyberNet] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Via: Vista Blog and CyberNet] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
