<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista Computers Save about $75 per Year in Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-121228</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-121228</guid>
		<description>Balanced is definitely the route to go by default. It gives you the best of both worlds. I actually created my own custom power plan, but it is extremely similar to balanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balanced is definitely the route to go by default. It gives you the best of both worlds. I actually created my own custom power plan, but it is extremely similar to balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Cross</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-121134</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-121134</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that I'll be using the "balanced" option most of my time and the "high performence" (with the charger plugged in) when doing presentations... :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that I&#8217;ll be using the &#8220;balanced&#8221; option most of my time and the &#8220;high performence&#8221; (with the charger plugged in) when doing presentations&#8230; <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n-blue &#124; Vista Reduce Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118482</link>
		<dc:creator>n-blue &#124; Vista Reduce Global Warming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118482</guid>
		<description>[...] ????????????????? CybernetNews&#xA0; ??????? Windows Vista ??????????? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ????????????????? CybernetNews&#xA0; ??????? Windows Vista ??????????? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118387</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-118314" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mris wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I just measured that my six-months old Vista dualcore-machine uses only 10 watts more energy than my four-year old computer using the power savings options.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Wow, just 10 watts more for a dual core machine! That's pretty darn good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-118314" rel="nofollow">Mris wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I just measured that my six-months old Vista dualcore-machine uses only 10 watts more energy than my four-year old computer using the power savings options.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Wow, just 10 watts more for a dual core machine! That&#8217;s pretty darn good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Sobre el ahorro de energía en Vista Win-Vista.es &#124; Blog de Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118359</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Sobre el ahorro de energía en Vista Win-Vista.es &#124; Blog de Windows Vista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118359</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; Vía Cybernet News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | Vía Cybernet News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mris</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118314</link>
		<dc:creator>Mris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118314</guid>
		<description>I just measured that my six-months old Vista dualcore-machine uses only 10 watts more energy than my four-year old computer using the power savings options.

Normally I let the processor use 100% performance when needed but when I have to leave my computer on overnight I'd like to easily switch to a power saving plan. I've tried unsuccessfully to find a widget or something to do this with one click.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just measured that my six-months old Vista dualcore-machine uses only 10 watts more energy than my four-year old computer using the power savings options.</p>
<p>Normally I let the processor use 100% performance when needed but when I have to leave my computer on overnight I&#8217;d like to easily switch to a power saving plan. I&#8217;ve tried unsuccessfully to find a widget or something to do this with one click.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITsVISTA Web Links: October 15th, 2007 &#124; ITsVISTA</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118250</link>
		<dc:creator>ITsVISTA Web Links: October 15th, 2007 &#124; ITsVISTA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118250</guid>
		<description>[...] Vista Computers Save about $75 per Year in Energy The effects of Vista&#8217;s Power Saver plan is measurable. (tags: Power Environment ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vista Computers Save about $75 per Year in Energy The effects of Vista&#8217;s Power Saver plan is measurable. (tags: Power Environment ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118217</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118217</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-118188" rel="nofollow"&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;XP users can use Performance on Demand (and other kinds of profiles) by installing the RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It runs my 2GHz CPU on 800MHz when I don’t need its power (most of the time).&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
There are several different applications that do stuff like this, but not to the extent of what Vista does. Vista also cuts back wireless performance and other things.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-118201" rel="nofollow"&gt;Lashiec wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The “Blog Action Day” link is incorrect, it ends in a 404.

Good to know Microsoft improved energy consumption in Vista (look, something worthwhile ;)), but I wonder if it would be an energy saver in desktop PCs as well…&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Thanks, I fixed the link. It can be an energy saver on a desktop as well depending on what you set your power plan to. The power plans are not just for laptops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-118188" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>XP users can use Performance on Demand (and other kinds of profiles) by installing the RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It runs my 2GHz CPU on 800MHz when I don’t need its power (most of the time).</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>There are several different applications that do stuff like this, but not to the extent of what Vista does. Vista also cuts back wireless performance and other things.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-118201" rel="nofollow">Lashiec wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>The “Blog Action Day” link is incorrect, it ends in a 404.</p>
<p>Good to know Microsoft improved energy consumption in Vista (look, something worthwhile ;)), but I wonder if it would be an energy saver in desktop PCs as well…</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Thanks, I fixed the link. It can be an energy saver on a desktop as well depending on what you set your power plan to. The power plans are not just for laptops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lashiec</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118201</link>
		<dc:creator>Lashiec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118201</guid>
		<description>The "Blog Action Day" link is incorrect, it ends in a 404.

Good to know Microsoft improved energy consumption in Vista (look, something worthwhile ;)), but I wonder if it would be an energy saver in desktop PCs as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Blog Action Day&#8221; link is incorrect, it ends in a 404.</p>
<p>Good to know Microsoft improved energy consumption in Vista (look, something worthwhile ;)), but I wonder if it would be an energy saver in desktop PCs as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118188</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/15/vista-computers-save-about-75-per-year-in-engergy/#comment-118188</guid>
		<description>XP users can use Performance on Demand (and other kinds of profiles) by installing the RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It runs my 2GHz CPU on 800MHz when I don't need its power (most of the time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XP users can use Performance on Demand (and other kinds of profiles) by installing the RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It runs my 2GHz CPU on 800MHz when I don&#8217;t need its power (most of the time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
