<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari 3.0.4 for Windows - Spelling and Grammar Check</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sander</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122823</link>
		<dc:creator>Sander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122823</guid>
		<description>Safari is required, the iPhone, Dreamweaver, Android OS, etc all run on webkit. A browser that utilises webkit is desirable.

Besides that, they tuned the text rendering, and together with Acrobat Reader it produces the best rendering on the windows system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari is required, the iPhone, Dreamweaver, Android OS, etc all run on webkit. A browser that utilises webkit is desirable.</p>
<p>Besides that, they tuned the text rendering, and together with Acrobat Reader it produces the best rendering on the windows system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122802</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122802</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-122728" rel="nofollow"&gt;Michele wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Do we really need Safari on Windows? Well I’ve downloaded the update as I use it just to make sure the website I make are Safari compatible. I find the new ‘Spelling and Grammar’ feature pretty fine for I’m not an English speaking guy. However I agree that Safari is totally out of place on Windows machines. I prefer Firefox and Opera. Those are very good browsers!&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
It's interesting that Microsoft has been king of spell-check/grammar check yet they haven't incorporated that into their browser, yet Apple has. Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-122728" rel="nofollow">Michele wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Do we really need Safari on Windows? Well I’ve downloaded the update as I use it just to make sure the website I make are Safari compatible. I find the new ‘Spelling and Grammar’ feature pretty fine for I’m not an English speaking guy. However I agree that Safari is totally out of place on Windows machines. I prefer Firefox and Opera. Those are very good browsers!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that Microsoft has been king of spell-check/grammar check yet they haven&#8217;t incorporated that into their browser, yet Apple has. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122767</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122767</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-122718" rel="nofollow"&gt;Peter Gasston wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;They’ve definitely put more into making this behave like a Windows app, but there’s still one problem: the interface. The brushed metal looks nice in OS X, but horrendous in Windows. Mac fans get bent out of shape when other apps “don’t look like Mac” (Firefox being a prime example), yet Safari 3 on Windows doesn’t look like Windows. Apple should just bow to the inevitable and make it look more like a nice Windows app; at least provide the option, anyway.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
I don't think they will be changing that anytime soon, and it's only bound to get worse as Apple brings more of their apps over to Windows. Now we have iTunes and Safari on Windows both of which seem out of place. The least they could do is make it skinnable.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-122728" rel="nofollow"&gt;Michele wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Do we really need Safari on Windows? Well I’ve downloaded the update as I use it just to make sure the website I make are Safari compatible. I find the new ‘Spelling and Grammar’ feature pretty fine for I’m not an English speaking guy. However I agree that Safari is totally out of place on Windows machines. I prefer Firefox and Opera. Those are very good browsers!&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
I thought the addition of grammar checking was especially nice since they are the first browser that I know of which checks that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-122718" rel="nofollow">Peter Gasston wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>They’ve definitely put more into making this behave like a Windows app, but there’s still one problem: the interface. The brushed metal looks nice in OS X, but horrendous in Windows. Mac fans get bent out of shape when other apps “don’t look like Mac” (Firefox being a prime example), yet Safari 3 on Windows doesn’t look like Windows. Apple should just bow to the inevitable and make it look more like a nice Windows app; at least provide the option, anyway.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they will be changing that anytime soon, and it&#8217;s only bound to get worse as Apple brings more of their apps over to Windows. Now we have iTunes and Safari on Windows both of which seem out of place. The least they could do is make it skinnable.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-122728" rel="nofollow">Michele wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Do we really need Safari on Windows? Well I’ve downloaded the update as I use it just to make sure the website I make are Safari compatible. I find the new ‘Spelling and Grammar’ feature pretty fine for I’m not an English speaking guy. However I agree that Safari is totally out of place on Windows machines. I prefer Firefox and Opera. Those are very good browsers!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I thought the addition of grammar checking was especially nice since they are the first browser that I know of which checks that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122728</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122728</guid>
		<description>Do we really need Safari on Windows? Well I've downloaded the update as I use it just to make sure the website I make are Safari compatible. I find the new 'Spelling and Grammar' feature pretty fine for I'm not an English speaking guy. However I agree that Safari is totally out of place on Windows machines. I prefer Firefox and Opera. Those are very good browsers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we really need Safari on Windows? Well I&#8217;ve downloaded the update as I use it just to make sure the website I make are Safari compatible. I find the new &#8216;Spelling and Grammar&#8217; feature pretty fine for I&#8217;m not an English speaking guy. However I agree that Safari is totally out of place on Windows machines. I prefer Firefox and Opera. Those are very good browsers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122720</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122720</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-122718" rel="nofollow"&gt;Peter Gasston wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;They’ve definitely put more into making this behave like a Windows app, but there’s still one problem: the interface. The brushed metal looks nice in OS X, but horrendous in Windows. Mac fans get bent out of shape when other apps “don’t look like Mac” (Firefox being a prime example), yet Safari 3 on Windows doesn’t look like Windows. Apple should just bow to the inevitable and make it look more like a nice Windows app; at least provide the option, anyway.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]

Totally agree. safari 3 is an eyesore on windows. I am not a huge fan of mac apps, but quicktime and itunes look kinda okay, while safari is totally out of place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-122718" rel="nofollow">Peter Gasston wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>They’ve definitely put more into making this behave like a Windows app, but there’s still one problem: the interface. The brushed metal looks nice in OS X, but horrendous in Windows. Mac fans get bent out of shape when other apps “don’t look like Mac” (Firefox being a prime example), yet Safari 3 on Windows doesn’t look like Windows. Apple should just bow to the inevitable and make it look more like a nice Windows app; at least provide the option, anyway.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Totally agree. safari 3 is an eyesore on windows. I am not a huge fan of mac apps, but quicktime and itunes look kinda okay, while safari is totally out of place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gasston</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122718</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gasston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122718</guid>
		<description>They've definitely put more into making this behave like a Windows app, but there's still one problem: the interface. The brushed metal looks nice in OS X, but horrendous in Windows. Mac fans get bent out of shape when other apps "don't look like Mac" (Firefox being a prime example), yet Safari 3 on Windows doesn't look like Windows. Apple should just bow to the inevitable and make it look more like a nice Windows app; at least provide the option, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve definitely put more into making this behave like a Windows app, but there&#8217;s still one problem: the interface. The brushed metal looks nice in OS X, but horrendous in Windows. Mac fans get bent out of shape when other apps &#8220;don&#8217;t look like Mac&#8221; (Firefox being a prime example), yet Safari 3 on Windows doesn&#8217;t look like Windows. Apple should just bow to the inevitable and make it look more like a nice Windows app; at least provide the option, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacques</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122716</link>
		<dc:creator>jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/15/safari-304-for-windows-spelling-and-grammar-check/#comment-122716</guid>
		<description>Yeap. There is better.
Too late, Apple, as usual on windows platforms.
Big effort though, it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeap. There is better.<br />
Too late, Apple, as usual on windows platforms.<br />
Big effort though, it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
