<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defragment Specific Files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-135770</link>
		<dc:creator>Karan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-135770</guid>
		<description>Fragmentation is a continuously occuring phenomenon, and if allowed to build up unchecked, it can degrade performance. So, the best solution is an automatic background defragmenter i.e one that can continuously put down fragmentation as it rises, unlike a manual/ scheduled defragmenter that leaves the field open to fragmentation  in between runs. 

The manual/scheduled defragmenters also tend to be resource hogs and you cannot use the PC when they are running, while good auto defraggers have I/O sensing and utilize only idle resources. The latest auto defraggers can also defragment with less than 5% free space, so really, there is no reason anymore to waste time on manual/scheduled defraggers. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragmentation is a continuously occuring phenomenon, and if allowed to build up unchecked, it can degrade performance. So, the best solution is an automatic background defragmenter i.e one that can continuously put down fragmentation as it rises, unlike a manual/ scheduled defragmenter that leaves the field open to fragmentation  in between runs. </p>
<p>The manual/scheduled defragmenters also tend to be resource hogs and you cannot use the PC when they are running, while good auto defraggers have I/O sensing and utilize only idle resources. The latest auto defraggers can also defragment with less than 5% free space, so really, there is no reason anymore to waste time on manual/scheduled defraggers. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarcasmatron</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-135740</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarcasmatron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-135740</guid>
		<description>I've been using it with Vista for a while and I've been pretty happy with it although I haven't noticed any speed improvements in my computer after Defragging.. I did a test defrag recently on my internal 250Gb D: Drive - Defraggler reported my drive as defragmented in 20 minutes, pretty impressive even though it still showed a large amount of nasty red squares. 

I then used Vistas built in defrag program on the same drive and that continued for over one and a half hours! So my question is, if Defraggler did such an excellent and rapid job, what was windows defrag doing for all that time? Is Vista slower but far more thourough, is Defraggler actually doing what it's reporting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using it with Vista for a while and I&#8217;ve been pretty happy with it although I haven&#8217;t noticed any speed improvements in my computer after Defragging.. I did a test defrag recently on my internal 250Gb D: Drive - Defraggler reported my drive as defragmented in 20 minutes, pretty impressive even though it still showed a large amount of nasty red squares. </p>
<p>I then used Vistas built in defrag program on the same drive and that continued for over one and a half hours! So my question is, if Defraggler did such an excellent and rapid job, what was windows defrag doing for all that time? Is Vista slower but far more thourough, is Defraggler actually doing what it&#8217;s reporting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A77 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Defraggler Beta - It&#8217;s time to defragment your hard disk</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-132247</link>
		<dc:creator>A77 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Defraggler Beta - It&#8217;s time to defragment your hard disk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-132247</guid>
		<description>[...] CTN Technorati Tags: Defragment, Defraggler, Computer Utility, Improve Computer Performance, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CTN Technorati Tags: Defragment, Defraggler, Computer Utility, Improve Computer Performance, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124563</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124563</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-124416" rel="nofollow"&gt;jacques wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It seems they are not on the way to become paying, so I hope too!&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
I don't think so. They are well respected by the software community for providing free quality apps, and I don't think they would turn to paid software and tarnish that reputation. I have noticed that they do bundle things like the Yahoo! toolbar with their programs though, so they probably make money off of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124416" rel="nofollow">jacques wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>It seems they are not on the way to become paying, so I hope too!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so. They are well respected by the software community for providing free quality apps, and I don&#8217;t think they would turn to paid software and tarnish that reputation. I have noticed that they do bundle things like the Yahoo! toolbar with their programs though, so they probably make money off of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defragment Specific Files with Defraggler</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124530</link>
		<dc:creator>Defragment Specific Files with Defraggler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124530</guid>
		<description>[...] Link via CyberNet News. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link via CyberNet News. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacques</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124416</link>
		<dc:creator>jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124416</guid>
		<description>It seems they are not on the way to become paying, so I hope too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems they are not on the way to become paying, so I hope too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124347</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124347</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-124234" rel="nofollow"&gt;CoryC wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Not bad, it’s fairly quick and very simple to use.  In the future I would like to be able to schedule when the drive should be defragged or should I say “defraggled” ;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
That would be a really nice option. I wouldn't think that it would be so difficult to add, but it would be tremendously helpful to the users.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-124236" rel="nofollow"&gt;RJ wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;When I cam e across this post on my RSS feed, I decided to install it as you suggested on my Passport. However, I installed it directly on my Passport ‘Portable Apps’ folder and it works like magic!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Glad I gave you that idea! ;)

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-124268" rel="nofollow"&gt;jacques wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I use Defraggler after CCleaner once a week (no schedule) since some months-for CC at least- Both are handy and your article’s well done and attractive for those who don’t know Piriform free products. A big thank to this team.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
They definitely make some amazing software, and I hope they keep pumping it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124234" rel="nofollow">CoryC wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Not bad, it’s fairly quick and very simple to use.  In the future I would like to be able to schedule when the drive should be defragged or should I say “defraggled” <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That would be a really nice option. I wouldn&#8217;t think that it would be so difficult to add, but it would be tremendously helpful to the users.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124236" rel="nofollow">RJ wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>When I cam e across this post on my RSS feed, I decided to install it as you suggested on my Passport. However, I installed it directly on my Passport ‘Portable Apps’ folder and it works like magic!!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Glad I gave you that idea! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124268" rel="nofollow">jacques wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I use Defraggler after CCleaner once a week (no schedule) since some months-for CC at least- Both are handy and your article’s well done and attractive for those who don’t know Piriform free products. A big thank to this team.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>They definitely make some amazing software, and I hope they keep pumping it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacques</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124268</link>
		<dc:creator>jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124268</guid>
		<description>I use Defraggler after CCleaner once a week (no schedule) since some months-for CC at least- Both are handy and your article's well done and attractive for those who don't know Piriform free products. A big thank to this team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Defraggler after CCleaner once a week (no schedule) since some months-for CC at least- Both are handy and your article&#8217;s well done and attractive for those who don&#8217;t know Piriform free products. A big thank to this team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CGA</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124260</link>
		<dc:creator>CGA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124260</guid>
		<description>And for the command line junkies there's always Sysinternal's Contig, blazing fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for the command line junkies there&#8217;s always Sysinternal&#8217;s Contig, blazing fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ????? ????? ?????? Defraggler &#124; Yogaf.com</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124255</link>
		<dc:creator>????? ????? ?????? Defraggler &#124; Yogaf.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124255</guid>
		<description>[...] ????:Cybernetnews ???? ?????:?????? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ????:Cybernetnews ???? ?????:?????? ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124236</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124236</guid>
		<description>:D :D
I've been using Defraggler for quite some time now. I came across it when I had to download a fresh copy of CCleaner. Since then Defraggling is the way to do!

I have another laptop which is my work machine - read as pretty straight forward installs with non-OS software -  :roll: - and I have all my fav bits sitting/tethered off of a WD Passport 140gb. When I cam e across this post on my RSS feed, I decided to install it as you suggested on my Passport. However, I installed it directly on my Passport 'Portable Apps' folder and it works like magic!!

Now, if you'll excuse me I got me some Defraggling to take care of on this 'straight-laced' machine! :D :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> :D<br />
I&#8217;ve been using Defraggler for quite some time now. I came across it when I had to download a fresh copy of CCleaner. Since then Defraggling is the way to do!</p>
<p>I have another laptop which is my work machine - read as pretty straight forward installs with non-OS software -  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> - and I have all my fav bits sitting/tethered off of a WD Passport 140gb. When I cam e across this post on my RSS feed, I decided to install it as you suggested on my Passport. However, I installed it directly on my Passport &#8216;Portable Apps&#8217; folder and it works like magic!!</p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;ll excuse me I got me some Defraggling to take care of on this &#8217;straight-laced&#8217; machine! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124234</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/28/defragment-specific-files/#comment-124234</guid>
		<description>Not bad, it's fairly quick and very simple to use.  In the future I would like to be able to schedule when the drive should be defragged or should I say "defraggled" ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad, it&#8217;s fairly quick and very simple to use.  In the future I would like to be able to schedule when the drive should be defragged or should I say &#8220;defraggled&#8221; <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
