<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2.0.0.11: Two Releases in One Week?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124409</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124409</guid>
		<description>Well the more important thing is that the bug is going to be fixed in the next release. They realised they made a mistake and now they are taking steps to correct that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the more important thing is that the bug is going to be fixed in the next release. They realised they made a mistake and now they are taking steps to correct that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124342</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124342</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-124310" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Opinionated Blogger wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I think it is a bit obnoxious that there were two releases within a few days of each other. I went on to my computer and thought to myself, “Didn’t I just update this.” The problem is I use up to three computers a day between work, school and my home.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
They could have just left the issue alone though, so I guess we should be grateful that they are fixing it so fast.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-124316" rel="nofollow"&gt;Not Required wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;don’t you prefer to get two version of an application if the next one fix a problem? and don’t you prefer to get that update as early as possible? A lot of people seems to think it’s a shame to publish an application, but i prefer someone saying: “i’ve got it wrong this time, here’s a correction” than: “wait next month we’re doing updates on the interface”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Yes, I absolutely prefer having something that works the way I expect it to, but this is probably something that shouldn't have slipped by their testers to begin with.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-124337" rel="nofollow"&gt;s wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;i think opera has a better track record at fixing bugs.
check secunia&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
When it comes to security related bugs Opera is really good about fixing them rapidly, normally faster than Mozilla. I do think that Opera's testing process is a little better than Mozilla's because they haven't done such frequent releases like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124310" rel="nofollow">The Opinionated Blogger wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I think it is a bit obnoxious that there were two releases within a few days of each other. I went on to my computer and thought to myself, “Didn’t I just update this.” The problem is I use up to three computers a day between work, school and my home.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>They could have just left the issue alone though, so I guess we should be grateful that they are fixing it so fast.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124316" rel="nofollow">Not Required wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>don’t you prefer to get two version of an application if the next one fix a problem? and don’t you prefer to get that update as early as possible? A lot of people seems to think it’s a shame to publish an application, but i prefer someone saying: “i’ve got it wrong this time, here’s a correction” than: “wait next month we’re doing updates on the interface”.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yes, I absolutely prefer having something that works the way I expect it to, but this is probably something that shouldn&#8217;t have slipped by their testers to begin with.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-124337" rel="nofollow">s wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>i think opera has a better track record at fixing bugs.<br />
check secunia</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>When it comes to security related bugs Opera is really good about fixing them rapidly, normally faster than Mozilla. I do think that Opera&#8217;s testing process is a little better than Mozilla&#8217;s because they haven&#8217;t done such frequent releases like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124337</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124337</guid>
		<description>i think opera has a better track record at fixing bugs.
check secunia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think opera has a better track record at fixing bugs.<br />
check secunia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amak</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124332</link>
		<dc:creator>Amak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124332</guid>
		<description>I'd rather have many updates than none. Sure,that means there are many errors, but it also shows that they are constantly trying to fix them.

Look at IE and it's countless bugs....few updates here and there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather have many updates than none. Sure,that means there are many errors, but it also shows that they are constantly trying to fix them.</p>
<p>Look at IE and it&#8217;s countless bugs&#8230;.few updates here and there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epiac1216</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124324</link>
		<dc:creator>epiac1216</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124324</guid>
		<description>I totally echo with previous comment.  Firefox is the only browser I know that really takes the stability and security issues very seriously.  

Nobody's perfect.  It takes a lot of guts to accept ones mistakes and adopt the corrective measures immediately.  I know of no other company that is constantly making security improvements into its software.  Mozilla is one of the few leaders in this excellence attitude.    

The Internet is like a minefield, full of explosives everywhere.  We need a company like Mozilla to take care of the bugs for us before our computers get infected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally echo with previous comment.  Firefox is the only browser I know that really takes the stability and security issues very seriously.  </p>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s perfect.  It takes a lot of guts to accept ones mistakes and adopt the corrective measures immediately.  I know of no other company that is constantly making security improvements into its software.  Mozilla is one of the few leaders in this excellence attitude.    </p>
<p>The Internet is like a minefield, full of explosives everywhere.  We need a company like Mozilla to take care of the bugs for us before our computers get infected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Required</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124316</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124316</guid>
		<description>Hi, don't take this personally but i've already heard what you're saying from a lot of peoples. It looks to me reading your post that it's annoying to get so much updates... I generally keep myself quiet and just let peoples talk, but your blog seems to be gaining attention right now, so here's:


1 - I don't know what operating system you use, but on mine these updates are made automagically, everything get updated whenever there's a new security update. Note that i mentioned it's a security update, not just an usual update.

2 - don't you prefer to get two version of an application if the next one fix a problem? and don't you prefer to get that update as early as possible? A lot of people seems to think it's a shame to publish an application, but i prefer someone saying: "i've got it wrong this time, here's a correction" than: "wait next month we're doing updates on the interface".

3- if you ask yourself: "what are those people that post an update the next day... Couldn't they be more professional?" If by professional you read a paying software company that make four updates a year for no bug fixes but just for SELLING updates, i can understand you feel disappointed...


GO FIREFOX! GO!



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, don&#8217;t take this personally but i&#8217;ve already heard what you&#8217;re saying from a lot of peoples. It looks to me reading your post that it&#8217;s annoying to get so much updates&#8230; I generally keep myself quiet and just let peoples talk, but your blog seems to be gaining attention right now, so here&#8217;s:</p>
<p>1 - I don&#8217;t know what operating system you use, but on mine these updates are made automagically, everything get updated whenever there&#8217;s a new security update. Note that i mentioned it&#8217;s a security update, not just an usual update.</p>
<p>2 - don&#8217;t you prefer to get two version of an application if the next one fix a problem? and don&#8217;t you prefer to get that update as early as possible? A lot of people seems to think it&#8217;s a shame to publish an application, but i prefer someone saying: &#8220;i&#8217;ve got it wrong this time, here&#8217;s a correction&#8221; than: &#8220;wait next month we&#8217;re doing updates on the interface&#8221;.</p>
<p>3- if you ask yourself: &#8220;what are those people that post an update the next day&#8230; Couldn&#8217;t they be more professional?&#8221; If by professional you read a paying software company that make four updates a year for no bug fixes but just for SELLING updates, i can understand you feel disappointed&#8230;</p>
<p>GO FIREFOX! GO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Opinionated Blogger</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124310</link>
		<dc:creator>The Opinionated Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124310</guid>
		<description>I think it is a bit obnoxious that there were two releases within a few days of each other. I went on to my computer and thought to myself, "Didn't I just update this." The problem is I use up to three computers a day between work, school and my home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a bit obnoxious that there were two releases within a few days of each other. I went on to my computer and thought to myself, &#8220;Didn&#8217;t I just update this.&#8221; The problem is I use up to three computers a day between work, school and my home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fx 2.0.0.11 Coming 11/30?! &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124298</link>
		<dc:creator>Fx 2.0.0.11 Coming 11/30?! &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/11/29/firefox-20011-two-releases-in-one-week/#comment-124298</guid>
		<description>[...] CyberNet News: Why is this such a big deal? Extensions such as FoxSaver and Fotofox use that property for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CyberNet News: Why is this such a big deal? Extensions such as FoxSaver and Fotofox use that property for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
