<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista SP1 Introduces Hotpatching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Hotpatching en SP1: actualiza el sistema sin reiniciarlo Win-Vista.es &#124; Blog de Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126936</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Hotpatching en SP1: actualiza el sistema sin reiniciarlo Win-Vista.es &#124; Blog de Windows Vista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126936</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; Vía Cybernet News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | Vía Cybernet News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WindowsObserver</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126754</link>
		<dc:creator>WindowsObserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126754</guid>
		<description>Great article - thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article - thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126704</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126704</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-126651" rel="nofollow"&gt;mi wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;hotpatching requires SYSTEM privileges and a signature-token, it’s only performed by a Microsoft component. A virus can’t use hotpatching because it doesn’t have the right permissions.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
True, but that's not to say that a virus wouldn't be able to spoof permissions. It wouldn't be the first time that has happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-126651" rel="nofollow">mi wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>hotpatching requires SYSTEM privileges and a signature-token, it’s only performed by a Microsoft component. A virus can’t use hotpatching because it doesn’t have the right permissions.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>True, but that&#8217;s not to say that a virus wouldn&#8217;t be able to spoof permissions. It wouldn&#8217;t be the first time that has happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista SP1 permite instalar actualizaciones sin reiniciar</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126683</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista SP1 permite instalar actualizaciones sin reiniciar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126683</guid>
		<description>[...] Vía Cybernet News    Prohibida su copia total con o sin fines comerciales. Copias parciales deben citar la fuente.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vía Cybernet News    Prohibida su copia total con o sin fines comerciales. Copias parciales deben citar la fuente.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mi</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126651</link>
		<dc:creator>mi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126651</guid>
		<description>hotpatching requires SYSTEM privileges and a signature-token, it's only performed by a Microsoft component. A virus can't use hotpatching because it doesn't have the right permissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hotpatching requires SYSTEM privileges and a signature-token, it&#8217;s only performed by a Microsoft component. A virus can&#8217;t use hotpatching because it doesn&#8217;t have the right permissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITsVISTA Web Links: December 14th, 2007 &#124; ITsVISTA</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126634</link>
		<dc:creator>ITsVISTA Web Links: December 14th, 2007 &#124; ITsVISTA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126634</guid>
		<description>[...] Vista SP1 Introduces Hotpatching One of the improvements in Vista&#8217;s SP1 will be &#8216;hotpatching&#8217;, which should cut down on the amount of restarts required for updates. (tags: SP1 Updates ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vista SP1 Introduces Hotpatching One of the improvements in Vista&#8217;s SP1 will be &#8216;hotpatching&#8217;, which should cut down on the amount of restarts required for updates. (tags: SP1 Updates ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126447</guid>
		<description>That's true, but I also think that it would be easier to slip past antivirus scanners if the file update was much more instantaneous rather than delayed by restarting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true, but I also think that it would be easier to slip past antivirus scanners if the file update was much more instantaneous rather than delayed by restarting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126331</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/11/vista-sp1-introduces-hotpatching/#comment-126331</guid>
		<description>I don't see Hotpatching as a security threat.  A virus could just as easily install and then trigger a reboot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see Hotpatching as a security threat.  A virus could just as easily install and then trigger a reboot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
