Comments on: CyberNotes: Acid3 Browser Results http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/ Technology News Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:38:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Mr.TFM http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-133234 Mr.TFM Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:58:25 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-133234 (on Mac) Safari 3.04 39% Safari 3.1 75% WebKit (lastest Nightly) 93% Firefox 3 Beta 4 67% (on Mac)
Safari 3.04 39%
Safari 3.1 75%
WebKit (lastest Nightly) 93%
Firefox 3 Beta 4 67%

]]> By: James http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132966 James Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:56:49 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132966 I currently get 70/100 now on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008031304 Minefield/3.0b5pre I currently get 70/100 now on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008031304 Minefield/3.0b5pre

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132767 Ryan Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:04:05 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132767 [div id=commentquote]<a href="#comment-132743" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><blockquote>My firefox 2.0.0.12 on vista got a 52?</blockquote>[/div] Huh, it must have gotten smarter on your machine. 8O Anonymous wrote:
My firefox 2.0.0.12 on vista got a 52?

Huh, it must have gotten smarter on your machine. 8O

]]> By: Anonymous http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132743 Anonymous Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:23:29 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132743 My firefox 2.0.0.12 on vista got a 52? My firefox 2.0.0.12 on vista got a 52?

]]> By: James http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132692 James Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:21:18 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132692 @beoenduser, the SeaMonkey 1.1.* is on the same 1.8 branch as Firefox 2.0 so no surprise. The upcoming SeaMonkey 2.0 will likely do better much like Firefox 3.0 as they are on the 1.9 Gecko branch. @beoenduser, the SeaMonkey 1.1.* is on the same 1.8 branch as Firefox 2.0 so no surprise. The upcoming SeaMonkey 2.0 will likely do better much like Firefox 3.0 as they are on the 1.9 Gecko branch.

]]> By: James http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132691 James Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:19:34 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132691 The current 1.9 Trunk nightlies (where Firefox 3.0 is being developed until it branches for release) I have on Linux gets 68/100 while it is just recently reported a recent hourly can get 69/100 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008030704 Minefield/3.0b5pre The current 1.9 Trunk nightlies (where Firefox 3.0 is being developed until it branches for release) I have on Linux gets 68/100 while it is just recently reported a recent hourly can get 69/100

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008030704 Minefield/3.0b5pre

]]> By: beoenduser http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132669 beoenduser Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:39:39 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132669 I tried it in SeaMonkey 1.1.4 on my SuSE Linux 10.0 machine and I got a 50 - Fail. :| I tried it in SeaMonkey 1.1.4 on my SuSE Linux 10.0 machine and I got a 50 - Fail. :|

]]> By: CoryC http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132622 CoryC Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:42:08 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132622 [div id=commentquote]<a href="#comment-132570" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><blockquote>[div id=commentquote]<a href="#comment-132552" rel="nofollow">CoryC wrote:</a><blockquote>IE 8 Beta 1 doesn’t pass Acid 2 or Acid 3 test. It received a 17/100 on the Acid 3 test. I thought it was supposed to pass Acid 2?</blockquote>[/div]It does pass Acid2. I’ve just tested it in a virtal machine and the smiley face renders perfectly fine :) Are you sure you weren’t running IE8b1 in IE7-mode?</blockquote>[/div] I was using it in the default mode. There was a drop-down list under the right "eye". The IE Team even has blog post describing <a href='http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/05/why-isn-t-ie8-passing-acid2.aspx' rel="nofollow">Why Isn't IE8 Passing Acid2?</a> Change wrote:
CoryC wrote:
IE 8 Beta 1 doesn’t pass Acid 2 or Acid 3 test. It received a 17/100 on the Acid 3 test. I thought it was supposed to pass Acid 2?

It does pass Acid2. I’ve just tested it in a virtal machine and the smiley face renders perfectly fine :) Are you sure you weren’t running IE8b1 in IE7-mode?

I was using it in the default mode. There was a drop-down list under the right “eye”.

The IE Team even has blog post describing Why Isn’t IE8 Passing Acid2?

]]> By: Amaroq http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132618 Amaroq Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:03:58 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132618 My Firefox on Ubuntu 7.10 gets 50. But a friend of mine who compiled his Firefox from source on Gentoo gets 53. My Firefox on Ubuntu 7.10 gets 50. But a friend of mine who compiled his Firefox from source on Gentoo gets 53.

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132604 Ryan Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:57:23 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132604 [div id=commentquote]<a href="#comment-132557" rel="nofollow">DeepFreeze wrote:</a><blockquote>So what browser has a 100/100 pass? lol how do those guys know that there tests were hundred percent accurate. lol</blockquote>[/div] I've actually wondered the same thing, but seeing that they are the ones who create the standards I would expect that they know what they are doing. DeepFreeze wrote:
So what browser has a 100/100 pass? lol how do those guys know that there tests were hundred percent accurate. lol

I’ve actually wondered the same thing, but seeing that they are the ones who create the standards I would expect that they know what they are doing.

]]> By: natmaster http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132583 natmaster Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:26:11 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132583 On digg, please digg it. http://digg.com/software/Acid3_Browser_Results On digg, please digg it.
http://digg.com/software/Acid3.....er_Results

]]> By: M Henri Day http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132573 M Henri Day Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:24:30 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132573 My favourite Ubuntu browser, stiKK's Swiftweasel 3 beta 3, which dates from 15 February 2008, attains a score of 58. Let us see how it will rank when v 3 beta 4 is released, hopefully in a few days.... Henri My favourite Ubuntu browser, stiKK’s Swiftweasel 3 beta 3, which dates from 15 February 2008, attains a score of 58. Let us see how it will rank when v 3 beta 4 is released, hopefully in a few days….

Henri

]]> By: Change http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132570 Change Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:33:22 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132570 [div id=commentquote]<a href="#comment-132552" rel="nofollow">CoryC wrote:</a><blockquote>IE 8 Beta 1 doesn’t pass Acid 2 or Acid 3 test. It received a 17/100 on the Acid 3 test. I thought it was supposed to pass Acid 2?</blockquote>[/div] It does pass Acid2. I've just tested it in a virtal machine and the smiley face renders perfectly fine :) Are you sure you weren't running IE8b1 in IE7-mode? CoryC wrote:
IE 8 Beta 1 doesn’t pass Acid 2 or Acid 3 test. It received a 17/100 on the Acid 3 test. I thought it was supposed to pass Acid 2?

It does pass Acid2. I’ve just tested it in a virtal machine and the smiley face renders perfectly fine :) Are you sure you weren’t running IE8b1 in IE7-mode?

]]> By: natmaster http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132559 natmaster Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:18:01 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132559 Please add IE8 Beta 1 results for full listing. Please add IE8 Beta 1 results for full listing.

]]> By: DeepFreeze http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132557 DeepFreeze Thu, 06 Mar 2008 06:23:46 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132557 So what browser has a 100/100 pass? lol how do those guys know that there tests were hundred percent accurate. lol So what browser has a 100/100 pass? lol how do those guys know that there tests were hundred percent accurate. lol

]]> By: CoryC http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132552 CoryC Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:38:21 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132552 IE 8 Beta 1 doesn't pass Acid 2 or Acid 3 test. It received a 17/100 on the Acid 3 test. I thought it was supposed to pass Acid 2? IE 8 Beta 1 doesn’t pass Acid 2 or Acid 3 test. It received a 17/100 on the Acid 3 test. I thought it was supposed to pass Acid 2?

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132535 Ryan Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:02:20 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132535 [div id=commentquote]<a href="#comment-132503" rel="nofollow">Inferno_str1ke wrote:</a><blockquote>Any chance of trying out Konqueror?</blockquote>[/div] My openSUSE machine is having some issues right now so I couldn't try it out in Konqueror, but Tinhed said it crashed his browser. [div id=commentquote]<a href="#comment-132510" rel="nofollow">brian wrote:</a><blockquote><a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/brelfielfan/Acid3Tests?authkey=_OWhq0Qzarg" rel="nofollow">http://picasaweb.google.com/br.....OWhq0Qzarg</a> 4 screenshots of acid3 tests on 4 ubuntu web browsers.</blockquote>[/div] Wow, I haven't even heard of some of those browsers. ;) Inferno_str1ke wrote:
Any chance of trying out Konqueror?

My openSUSE machine is having some issues right now so I couldn’t try it out in Konqueror, but Tinhed said it crashed his browser.

brian wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/br.....OWhq0Qzarg
4 screenshots of acid3 tests on 4 ubuntu web browsers.

Wow, I haven’t even heard of some of those browsers. ;)

]]> By: kvascola http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132521 kvascola Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:05:14 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132521 Ubuntu 7.10 Firefox 2.0.0.12 - 50/100 Opera 9.50 build 1834 - 65/100 Ubuntu 7.10

Firefox 2.0.0.12 - 50/100
Opera 9.50 build 1834 - 65/100

]]> By: dkong http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132514 dkong Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:07:14 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132514 OH WOW @ IE7's results...Christ. FF2 has some weird symbol on it.... OH WOW @ IE7’s results…Christ.

FF2 has some weird symbol on it….

]]> By: Mohan http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132512 Mohan Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:14:26 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132512 Looks like IE 7 did as horrible as I though it would, but Webkit powered Safari did very well, kudos to the Webkit team. Looks like IE 7 did as horrible as I though it would, but Webkit powered Safari did very well, kudos to the Webkit team.

]]>