<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Run Downloads in Firefox Instead of Saving Them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-135619</link>
		<dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-135619</guid>
		<description>"The difference is that a file you run is downloaded and stored in a temporary folder that is periodically emptied by the operating system..."

With Download Statusbar https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/26 you can delete the files when you are done installing, instead of waiting for Windows to do it on its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The difference is that a file you run is downloaded and stored in a temporary folder that is periodically emptied by the operating system&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>With Download Statusbar <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/26" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/26</a> you can delete the files when you are done installing, instead of waiting for Windows to do it on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-135618</link>
		<dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-135618</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-135593"&gt;Inferno_str1ke wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It may well work with Firefox 3 but Mozilla seem determined that users of the Beta shouldn’t be allowed to use extensions with it. Anyone who uses version 2 able to post a link to the .xpi file on here - its hidden if you use Beta 5.

Edit: cool, just noticed my Gravatar show up for the first time.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]

Expand the 'advanced details' section at the bottom to get to the Complete Version History link: http://blog.ffextensionguru.com/2008/03/27/update-new-amo-launched/ 

This is going to be 'fixed' in the new AMO 3.2.1 launch this coming week: http://blog.ffextensionguru.com/2008/04/11/amo-321-coming-soon/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-135593">Inferno_str1ke wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>It may well work with Firefox 3 but Mozilla seem determined that users of the Beta shouldn’t be allowed to use extensions with it. Anyone who uses version 2 able to post a link to the .xpi file on here - its hidden if you use Beta 5.</p>
<p>Edit: cool, just noticed my Gravatar show up for the first time.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Expand the &#8216;advanced details&#8217; section at the bottom to get to the Complete Version History link: <a href="http://blog.ffextensionguru.com/2008/03/27/update-new-amo-launched/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ffextensionguru.co.....-launched/</a> </p>
<p>This is going to be &#8216;fixed&#8217; in the new AMO 3.2.1 launch this coming week: <a href="http://blog.ffextensionguru.com/2008/04/11/amo-321-coming-soon/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ffextensionguru.co.....ming-soon/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-135593</link>
		<dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-135593</guid>
		<description>It may well work with Firefox 3 but Mozilla seem determined that users of the Beta shouldn't be allowed to use extensions with it. Anyone who uses version 2 able to post a link to the .xpi file on here - its hidden if you use Beta 5.

Edit: cool, just noticed my Gravatar show up for the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may well work with Firefox 3 but Mozilla seem determined that users of the Beta shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to use extensions with it. Anyone who uses version 2 able to post a link to the .xpi file on here - its hidden if you use Beta 5.</p>
<p>Edit: cool, just noticed my Gravatar show up for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StationStops.com</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-135048</link>
		<dc:creator>StationStops.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-135048</guid>
		<description>Ryan, I am like you I avoided these things forever, now I consider anyone with a broadband connection selling themselves short.

From the server's perspective, there is no substantial difference between someone using a download manager and you just being conveniently located near the server with the same connection.

Yes it will create 10x the connections, but those connections will be closed 10x quicker.

The HTTP spec allows for 3 concurrent connections, so you can still get massive speed increases even while being a good client.

Of course its all YMMV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, I am like you I avoided these things forever, now I consider anyone with a broadband connection selling themselves short.</p>
<p>From the server&#8217;s perspective, there is no substantial difference between someone using a download manager and you just being conveniently located near the server with the same connection.</p>
<p>Yes it will create 10x the connections, but those connections will be closed 10x quicker.</p>
<p>The HTTP spec allows for 3 concurrent connections, so you can still get massive speed increases even while being a good client.</p>
<p>Of course its all YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: OpenDownload &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-135001</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: OpenDownload &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-135001</guid>
		<description>[...] Tip Source: CyberNet News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tip Source: CyberNet News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Guru</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-135000</link>
		<dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-135000</guid>
		<description>Groovy, nice to have this feature again. Though not sure how often I'll use it as so use to saving then opening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groovy, nice to have this feature again. Though not sure how often I&#8217;ll use it as so use to saving then opening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-134973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-134973</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-134280" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mohan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;There used to one similar to this back in FF 1.x but it was never updated so I kinda forgot about it, thanks for the link unfortunately it doesn’t work with FF 3 Beta 4 yet.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
It works, but only if you've have Firefox set to ignore the version requirements.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-134285" rel="nofollow"&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;but what will this do with download managers plugins.. like Flashgot?&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Not actually sure, but I can't imagine it would affect them.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-134329" rel="nofollow"&gt;StationStops wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;When I got 25Mbps FIOS I got frustrated with any browser’s download speed - the ‘long fat pipe’ problem meant I was usually downloading well below my connection speed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
For some reason I've never really been big on using download managers. I know that you can really get some big speed increases as you've observed, but I don't like having an extra application running in the background for that. It's generally easier on the servers that I'm downloading from as well helping to keep them from getting overloaded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-134280" rel="nofollow">Mohan wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>There used to one similar to this back in FF 1.x but it was never updated so I kinda forgot about it, thanks for the link unfortunately it doesn’t work with FF 3 Beta 4 yet.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It works, but only if you&#8217;ve have Firefox set to ignore the version requirements.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-134285" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>but what will this do with download managers plugins.. like Flashgot?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Not actually sure, but I can&#8217;t imagine it would affect them.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-134329" rel="nofollow">StationStops wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>When I got 25Mbps FIOS I got frustrated with any browser’s download speed - the ‘long fat pipe’ problem meant I was usually downloading well below my connection speed.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>For some reason I&#8217;ve never really been big on using download managers. I know that you can really get some big speed increases as you&#8217;ve observed, but I don&#8217;t like having an extra application running in the background for that. It&#8217;s generally easier on the servers that I&#8217;m downloading from as well helping to keep them from getting overloaded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-134386</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-134386</guid>
		<description>Thank you! I was missing this option a lot as well.

StationStops: does Internet Download Manager download files to a temp location first too, so that when you "run" a file, it gets cleared from the temp location after? (that's the advantage of this extension)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! I was missing this option a lot as well.</p>
<p>StationStops: does Internet Download Manager download files to a temp location first too, so that when you &#8220;run&#8221; a file, it gets cleared from the temp location after? (that&#8217;s the advantage of this extension)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Cammarata</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-134377</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Cammarata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-134377</guid>
		<description>Yes, great plugin, been using it for months.  It actually does work fine in the Firefox 3 betas.  You just need to modify the xpi or install an addon that will let you ignore the supported version check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, great plugin, been using it for months.  It actually does work fine in the Firefox 3 betas.  You just need to modify the xpi or install an addon that will let you ignore the supported version check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StationStops</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-134329</link>
		<dc:creator>StationStops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-134329</guid>
		<description>When I got 25Mbps FIOS I got frustrated with any browser's download speed - the 'long fat pipe' problem meant I was usually downloading well below my connection speed.

Thats when I tried 'Internet Download Manager' - it takes over downloads for Firefox and parallelizes all downloads (when it can, which is about 90% of the time).

Now most of my downloads happen at about 2.7 MEGABYTES per second.

Oh and it will sort your downloads any way you like, prevent you from re-downloading stuff you already have, handles resumes perfectly, and lets you run the download, or open its folder when its done.

I think there are other programs that do this to, but I don't remember which ones I have tried.

I heartily suggest you review it, its very much in the Cybernet niche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I got 25Mbps FIOS I got frustrated with any browser&#8217;s download speed - the &#8216;long fat pipe&#8217; problem meant I was usually downloading well below my connection speed.</p>
<p>Thats when I tried &#8216;Internet Download Manager&#8217; - it takes over downloads for Firefox and parallelizes all downloads (when it can, which is about 90% of the time).</p>
<p>Now most of my downloads happen at about 2.7 MEGABYTES per second.</p>
<p>Oh and it will sort your downloads any way you like, prevent you from re-downloading stuff you already have, handles resumes perfectly, and lets you run the download, or open its folder when its done.</p>
<p>I think there are other programs that do this to, but I don&#8217;t remember which ones I have tried.</p>
<p>I heartily suggest you review it, its very much in the Cybernet niche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-134285</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-134285</guid>
		<description>but what will this do with download managers plugins.. like Flashgot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but what will this do with download managers plugins.. like Flashgot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/01/run-downloads-in-firefox-instead-of-saving-them/#comment-134280</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11843#comment-134280</guid>
		<description>There used to one similar to this back in FF 1.x but it was never updated so I kinda forgot about it, thanks for the link unfortunately it doesn't work with FF 3 Beta 4 yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There used to one similar to this back in FF 1.x but it was never updated so I kinda forgot about it, thanks for the link unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t work with FF 3 Beta 4 yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
