<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digsby: A Nice Cross-Network Messenger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-135087</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-135087</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-135045" rel="nofollow"&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The Mac and Linux versions, I believe, are not released yet.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Ahh, you're right. I saw the download links and assumed it was. Turns out when you click on those links it takes you to a "coming soon" page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-135045" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>The Mac and Linux versions, I believe, are not released yet.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Ahh, you&#8217;re right. I saw the download links and assumed it was. Turns out when you click on those links it takes you to a &#8220;coming soon&#8221; page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-135045</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-135045</guid>
		<description>The Mac and Linux versions, I believe, are not released yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mac and Linux versions, I believe, are not released yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-135030</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-135030</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-134982" rel="nofollow"&gt;xpgeek wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve been using it since it first went public beta. It is a little heavy on the RAM, but I just don’t mind much because I absolutely love it. It kicks Trillian and Pidgin ass in every way, and does just look beautiful on Vista too.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
It really does look nice, and that's something Pidgin really lacks.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-134983" rel="nofollow"&gt;Brad Linder wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;My only complaint is that Digsby doesn’t differentiate between normal tweets and replies/direct messages when it shows the pop up windows. So if you don’t regularly open the Twitter dialog and manually change to the replies/directs views, it’s easy to miss tweets directed at you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
The Twitter integration could be a little better, but considering how new Digsby is I'm sure they'll continue to develop the set of features.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-135021" rel="nofollow"&gt;K-IntheHouse wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;My biggest things are the Twitter and Gmail notifications. I love the ability to mark as read, delete, spam or archive a message right from the notification window! Saves me a bunch of time and when I actually open my Inbox, I don’t have all this crap staring at me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Those are the kind of things that really impress me with the service. The fact that they've put so much time into the details has really paid off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-134982" rel="nofollow">xpgeek wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I’ve been using it since it first went public beta. It is a little heavy on the RAM, but I just don’t mind much because I absolutely love it. It kicks Trillian and Pidgin ass in every way, and does just look beautiful on Vista too.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It really does look nice, and that&#8217;s something Pidgin really lacks.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-134983" rel="nofollow">Brad Linder wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>My only complaint is that Digsby doesn’t differentiate between normal tweets and replies/direct messages when it shows the pop up windows. So if you don’t regularly open the Twitter dialog and manually change to the replies/directs views, it’s easy to miss tweets directed at you.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>The Twitter integration could be a little better, but considering how new Digsby is I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll continue to develop the set of features.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-135021" rel="nofollow">K-IntheHouse wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>My biggest things are the Twitter and Gmail notifications. I love the ability to mark as read, delete, spam or archive a message right from the notification window! Saves me a bunch of time and when I actually open my Inbox, I don’t have all this crap staring at me.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Those are the kind of things that really impress me with the service. The fact that they&#8217;ve put so much time into the details has really paid off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K-IntheHouse</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-135021</link>
		<dc:creator>K-IntheHouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-135021</guid>
		<description>I have really gotten used to Digsby's many cool features since their public beta. My biggest things are the Twitter and Gmail notifications. I love the ability to mark as read, delete, spam or archive a message right from the notification window! Saves me a bunch of time and when I actually open my Inbox, I don't have all this crap staring at me. As Brad mentioned, it would be nice if it recognized direct tweets/replies and had a special sound setting or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have really gotten used to Digsby&#8217;s many cool features since their public beta. My biggest things are the Twitter and Gmail notifications. I love the ability to mark as read, delete, spam or archive a message right from the notification window! Saves me a bunch of time and when I actually open my Inbox, I don&#8217;t have all this crap staring at me. As Brad mentioned, it would be nice if it recognized direct tweets/replies and had a special sound setting or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-134997</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-134997</guid>
		<description>Tried it out as well a few days ago and it sure looks promising. Great features and interface. I uninstalled it thought, because of 1) the enormous RAM usage and 2) no possibility to login securely (to gmail at least, not sure if it's possible with the other services). Not sure if I can trust this app yet with all my passwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried it out as well a few days ago and it sure looks promising. Great features and interface. I uninstalled it thought, because of 1) the enormous RAM usage and 2) no possibility to login securely (to gmail at least, not sure if it&#8217;s possible with the other services). Not sure if I can trust this app yet with all my passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-134989</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-134989</guid>
		<description>Love the conversation reminds of the Adium does.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the conversation reminds of the Adium does.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-134987</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-134987</guid>
		<description>Trillian astra takes up approx. 27mb ram space. Since I only got a 256mb+128mb ram I should stick to astra, especially with only 780mb left of the 17gb I dont have much space. Though Digsby looks neat/simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trillian astra takes up approx. 27mb ram space. Since I only got a 256mb+128mb ram I should stick to astra, especially with only 780mb left of the 17gb I dont have much space. Though Digsby looks neat/simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Linder</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-134983</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Linder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-134983</guid>
		<description>I've been using it for a few weeks now, and while the RAM is a bit high, it uses about the same amount of RAM I used to need to run Pidgin and Twhirl. And not only does it replace both applications, but it also adds email and Facebook notifications. 

My only complaint is that Digsby doesn't differentiate between normal tweets and replies/direct messages when it shows the pop up windows. So if you don't regularly open the Twitter dialog and manually change to the replies/directs views, it's easy to miss tweets directed at you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using it for a few weeks now, and while the RAM is a bit high, it uses about the same amount of RAM I used to need to run Pidgin and Twhirl. And not only does it replace both applications, but it also adds email and Facebook notifications. </p>
<p>My only complaint is that Digsby doesn&#8217;t differentiate between normal tweets and replies/direct messages when it shows the pop up windows. So if you don&#8217;t regularly open the Twitter dialog and manually change to the replies/directs views, it&#8217;s easy to miss tweets directed at you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xpgeek</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-134982</link>
		<dc:creator>xpgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-134982</guid>
		<description>I've been using it since it first went public beta. It is a little heavy on the RAM, but I just don't mind much because I absolutely love it. It kicks Trillian and Pidgin ass in every way, and does just look beautiful on Vista too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using it since it first went public beta. It is a little heavy on the RAM, but I just don&#8217;t mind much because I absolutely love it. It kicks Trillian and Pidgin ass in every way, and does just look beautiful on Vista too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-134980</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-134980</guid>
		<description>I just checked and it does take up 44MB on my system, which is rather high. Hopefully they'll be able to reduce that by the time it is released, but I'm willing to sacrifice that much memory for it right now. Normally I wouldn't, but this really brings several different applications that I was using into one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked and it does take up 44MB on my system, which is rather high. Hopefully they&#8217;ll be able to reduce that by the time it is released, but I&#8217;m willing to sacrifice that much memory for it right now. Normally I wouldn&#8217;t, but this really brings several different applications that I was using into one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/02/digsby-a-nice-cross-network-messenger/#comment-134979</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=11871#comment-134979</guid>
		<description>Digsby consumes around 70MBs of RAM! That's more than any other messenger! Even web browsers and office suites consume less RAM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digsby consumes around 70MBs of RAM! That&#8217;s more than any other messenger! Even web browsers and office suites consume less RAM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
