How to rotate background wallpapers Firefox Extensions Cause Memory Leaks and Crashes Best Firefox Feed Readers Recover Lost Bookmarks in Firefox The World’s Biggest Show & Tell
Collapsed Today Collapsed CyberNotes
Collapsed Yesterday


imac gateway It seems as though Apple has been getting a lot of good publicity lately, and it’s definitely got to be helping their sales. The latest example is a benchmark and usability test done by the reputable Popular Mechanics lab. They tested two laptops and two desktops where half were Mac’s running Leopard and the other half were PC’s running Vista. Here are some of the specs they mention on the machines:

The Gateway One PC had a processor that runs 400 MHz slower than its iMac competitor (not a heck of a difference in this age of dual-core chips), but it also had two extra gigabytes of DDR2 memory. In the laptop category, our Asus M51 had a 2.2 GHz processor, compared to 2.4 GHz for our MacBook. But the Asus had a larger screen, a more sophisticated graphics card and an extra gig of RAM.

When it came to usability they received user feedback from both operating systems regarding design, ergonomics, and more. In the end both operating systems came out nearly equal in terms of usability, with only a slide edge being given to Mac OS X. When it came to performance, however, Mac’s seemed to dominate the board:

  iMac
($1499)
Gateway One
($1800)
MacBook
($1299)
Asus M51SR
($1299)
Startup Time 28.7s 1m 13s 41.6s 1m 51s
Shutdown Time 4.0s 44.3s 3.9s 25.4s
Install MS Office 4m 17s 6m 25s 2m 57s 4m 46s
Install Adobe CS3 31m 44s 25m 45s 34m 54s 21m
Launch Browser 3.3s 6.3s
Launch Word 4.2s 5.2s 5.3s 6.2s
Launch Photoshop 4.0s 5.5s 4.1s 5.2s
Launch Photoshop* 21.36s 40.0s 16.2s 25.5s
CD Rip 3m 35s 3m 35s 5m 49s 3m 9s

* This was a stress test where three video sources (a YouTube clip, a DVD and an .avi file), DivX encoding, instant messaging, Word, Adobe Acrobat and a spyware scan were simultaneously running when trying to launch Photoshop.

I would say that the comparisons are pretty fair since they are judging a consumer’s out-of-box experience, but I don’t know that this could be viewed as an accurate Vista vs. Mac comparison. It’s very likely that both the Gateway and the Asus came loaded with all kinds of bloatware that slowed down the PC horribly… particularly the startup and shutdown times. Looking at the Gateway One homepage I can see that it comes preinstalled with the entire McAfee Internet Suite, which isn’t exactly known as the speediest program.

Popular Mechanics took the correct route in their review though. They never really considered it a Mac vs. Vista matchup, but instead a Mac vs. PC. I do recommend checking out their entire review, which includes a lot more detailed benchmarks than those listed above.

Thanks for the tip Omar!

RSS Icon Enjoyed the post? Subscribe to our feed to get a daily dose of CyberNet!

Tags: Gadgets, Hardware, , , ,

Previous ArticleNext Article
 

Related Posts:


6 Unread Comment Tracking CyberMark This Article
RSS Icon
6

  1. Google (All-Star) Quote this Comment Report this Comment
    Avatar

    No XP? :roll:

  2. Avatar

    what a useless benchmark comparison!! always the same stupid comparisons…they have no idea. either you compare the operating systems using THE EXACT SAME HARDWARE or it’s useless. CPU calculations or RAM are two completely different things…i would tag this article as spam… :|

  3. Avatar
    me wrote:
    what a useless benchmark comparison!! always the same stupid comparisons…they have no idea. either you compare the operating systems using THE EXACT SAME HARDWARE or it’s useless. CPU calculations or RAM are two completely different things…i would tag this article as spam… :|

    I kind of went over that in the article I wrote though. If they said they were comparing the operating systems then that would be one thing, but they never really came out and said that. It was more of a comparison between the PC and Mac.

  4. Avatar

    Who runs Crysis faster Wins.And we all know who wins Hands Down.Take that PMechanics.

  5. Avatar

    Yeah, this really isn’t much of a comparison. The reason is that they really aren’t comparing anything. Comparing PCs to Macs? Well, the specs are different (1GB of RAM makes a difference!) and the operating systems are completely different as well. Comparing Vista to OS X? The hardware is different.

    What they should have done is run Vista and OS X on a Hackintosh version of one of these and compared them two Vista and OS X on an iMac.

  6. Avatar
    onlineapps wrote:
    What they should have done is run Vista and OS X on a Hackintosh version of one of these and compared them two Vista and OS X on an iMac.

    That would have actually been a fun comparison to see!

:mrgreen: :| :twisted: :arrow: 8O :) :? 8) :evil: :D :idea: :oops: :P :roll: ;) :cry: :o :lol: :x :( :!: :?:

Note: All links posted in comments will automatically be hyperlinked.

↓ Expand Text Area  or  Decrease Text Area ↑

 Find out how to track new comments!


 

  1. There aren't any trackbacks or pings yet. You can be the first by using this trackback URL.