<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foxit 2.3 PDF Reader Includes Tabs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/#comment-136579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12284#comment-136579</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-136476" rel="nofollow"&gt;Transcontinental wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I have Adobe Reader installed, “Adobe Reader Speed Launcher” at boot, I access Adobe Reader in 2-3 seconds and my cpu is only at 1.6MHz …

Foxit is nice, until it requires to install this or that plug-in to enable further view…

All this for 1 or 2 seconds at most? Not worth it in my opinion. Adobe Reader is complete, it’s just OK!&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Personally I don't like having the "speed launcher" installed. All that pretty much does is keep Adobe Reader minimized out of sight. It's essentially running in the background.

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-136479" rel="nofollow"&gt;andersonshatch wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Surely Transcontinental means Ghz….  :mrgreen:&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
Ha... I didn't even notice that at first. If he gets Adobe Reader to startup in 2 seconds on a 1.6&lt;strong&gt;MHz&lt;/strong&gt; machine I would be thoroughly impressed. ;)

[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-136501" rel="nofollow"&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The “Best Viewer” is actually PDF-Xchange Viewer, by Tracker Software.  It loads just slightly slower than Foxit, but it has a much nicer interface and more features, PLUS it lets you add text to PDF documents and save them, for free, unlike Foxit, which makes you buy the “Pro Pack” before you can save altered PDF documents.  I’ve compared them and I’m sticking with PDF-Xchange Viewer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
I do love PDF-Xchange Viewer, but one of my favorite things it had was tabs and now Foxit has those. I don't really add notes all that often, and I do believe that Foxit will let you but it will add some sort of watermark to the document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-136476" rel="nofollow">Transcontinental wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I have Adobe Reader installed, “Adobe Reader Speed Launcher” at boot, I access Adobe Reader in 2-3 seconds and my cpu is only at 1.6MHz …</p>
<p>Foxit is nice, until it requires to install this or that plug-in to enable further view…</p>
<p>All this for 1 or 2 seconds at most? Not worth it in my opinion. Adobe Reader is complete, it’s just OK!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t like having the &#8220;speed launcher&#8221; installed. All that pretty much does is keep Adobe Reader minimized out of sight. It&#8217;s essentially running in the background.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-136479" rel="nofollow">andersonshatch wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Surely Transcontinental means Ghz….  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Ha&#8230; I didn&#8217;t even notice that at first. If he gets Adobe Reader to startup in 2 seconds on a 1.6<strong>MHz</strong> machine I would be thoroughly impressed. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-136501" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>The “Best Viewer” is actually PDF-Xchange Viewer, by Tracker Software.  It loads just slightly slower than Foxit, but it has a much nicer interface and more features, PLUS it lets you add text to PDF documents and save them, for free, unlike Foxit, which makes you buy the “Pro Pack” before you can save altered PDF documents.  I’ve compared them and I’m sticking with PDF-Xchange Viewer.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I do love PDF-Xchange Viewer, but one of my favorite things it had was tabs and now Foxit has those. I don&#8217;t really add notes all that often, and I do believe that Foxit will let you but it will add some sort of watermark to the document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/#comment-136501</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12284#comment-136501</guid>
		<description>The "Best Viewer" is actually PDF-Xchange Viewer, by Tracker Software.  It loads just slightly slower than Foxit, but it has a much nicer interface and more features, PLUS it lets you add text to PDF documents and save them, for free, unlike Foxit, which makes you buy the "Pro Pack" before you can save altered PDF documents.  I've compared them and I'm sticking with PDF-Xchange Viewer.

As for Adobe's reader, I canned that ages ago.  It loads slowly and fills up your hard disk and registry with a bunch of junk.  Ugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Best Viewer&#8221; is actually PDF-Xchange Viewer, by Tracker Software.  It loads just slightly slower than Foxit, but it has a much nicer interface and more features, PLUS it lets you add text to PDF documents and save them, for free, unlike Foxit, which makes you buy the &#8220;Pro Pack&#8221; before you can save altered PDF documents.  I&#8217;ve compared them and I&#8217;m sticking with PDF-Xchange Viewer.</p>
<p>As for Adobe&#8217;s reader, I canned that ages ago.  It loads slowly and fills up your hard disk and registry with a bunch of junk.  Ugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/#comment-136484</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12284#comment-136484</guid>
		<description>1.6MHz like good old CP/M :) Yesterday, CP you see I did love you so, now it seams as if no one's to stay, oh! I believe in the relay ...

We are on Ghz, not many, but confirmed :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.6MHz like good old CP/M <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Yesterday, CP you see I did love you so, now it seams as if no one&#8217;s to stay, oh! I believe in the relay &#8230;</p>
<p>We are on Ghz, not many, but confirmed <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andersonshatch</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/#comment-136479</link>
		<dc:creator>andersonshatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12284#comment-136479</guid>
		<description>Surely Transcontinental means Ghz....  :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely Transcontinental means Ghz&#8230;.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/#comment-136476</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12284#comment-136476</guid>
		<description>There's a great fashion concerning a systematic opposition to all "institutionalized" software, and a quest as much for their alternatives. Now this is just fine when the alternative is worth it.

I have Adobe Reader installed, "Adobe Reader Speed Launcher" at boot, I access Adobe Reader in 2-3 seconds and my cpu is only at 1.6MHz ...

Foxit is nice, until it requires to install this or that plug-in to enable further view...

All this for 1 or 2 seconds at most? Not worth it in my opinion. Adobe Reader is complete, it's just OK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a great fashion concerning a systematic opposition to all &#8220;institutionalized&#8221; software, and a quest as much for their alternatives. Now this is just fine when the alternative is worth it.</p>
<p>I have Adobe Reader installed, &#8220;Adobe Reader Speed Launcher&#8221; at boot, I access Adobe Reader in 2-3 seconds and my cpu is only at 1.6MHz &#8230;</p>
<p>Foxit is nice, until it requires to install this or that plug-in to enable further view&#8230;</p>
<p>All this for 1 or 2 seconds at most? Not worth it in my opinion. Adobe Reader is complete, it&#8217;s just OK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/#comment-136439</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12284#comment-136439</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-136420" rel="nofollow"&gt;brunofs wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Wonderful!
Sometimes I generate lots of PDFs in sequence, this is very handy.

One more thing: They created a ‘firefox like’ search window (not floating, but attached to the interface). I really love this feature. Its annoying that floating thing in the middle of the document.&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
It's kinda surprising to me that they included so many nice features and yet it didn't get much of a version bump. To me this this felt more like a 3.0 release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-136420" rel="nofollow">brunofs wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Wonderful!<br />
Sometimes I generate lots of PDFs in sequence, this is very handy.</p>
<p>One more thing: They created a ‘firefox like’ search window (not floating, but attached to the interface). I really love this feature. Its annoying that floating thing in the middle of the document.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s kinda surprising to me that they included so many nice features and yet it didn&#8217;t get much of a version bump. To me this this felt more like a 3.0 release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brunofs</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/04/25/foxit-23-pdf-reader-includes-tabs/#comment-136420</link>
		<dc:creator>brunofs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12284#comment-136420</guid>
		<description>Wonderful!
Sometimes I generate lots of PDFs in sequence, this is very handy.

One more thing: They created a 'firefox like' search window (not floating, but attached to the interface). I really love this feature. Its annoying that floating thing in the middle of the document.

Very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful!<br />
Sometimes I generate lots of PDFs in sequence, this is very handy.</p>
<p>One more thing: They created a &#8216;firefox like&#8217; search window (not floating, but attached to the interface). I really love this feature. Its annoying that floating thing in the middle of the document.</p>
<p>Very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
