<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista Power Plans: Balanced vs. High Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/2008/05/07/vista-power-plans-balanced-vs-high-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/05/07/vista-power-plans-balanced-vs-high-performance/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/05/07/vista-power-plans-balanced-vs-high-performance/#comment-137652</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12485#comment-137652</guid>
		<description>[div id=commentquote]&lt;a href="#comment-137651" rel="nofollow"&gt;StationStops.com wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;After a couple months of just figuring my new notebook was a power hog, I did some testing and found out it was because I was using 802.11n.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;[/div]
That's really interesting... I would have never guessed that 802.11n would take up so much extra power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-137651" rel="nofollow">StationStops.com wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>After a couple months of just figuring my new notebook was a power hog, I did some testing and found out it was because I was using 802.11n.
</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That&#8217;s really interesting&#8230; I would have never guessed that 802.11n would take up so much extra power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StationStops.com</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/2008/05/07/vista-power-plans-balanced-vs-high-performance/#comment-137651</link>
		<dc:creator>StationStops.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12485#comment-137651</guid>
		<description>I was having horrible battery life, even on power saver, on my XPS1330.  I knew it wasn't Vista as I had ran Vista with great battery life on an older Dell laptop. 

After a couple months of just figuring my new notebook was a power hog, I did some testing and found out it was because I was using 802.11n.

When I switched to 802.11g or 802.11b, my battery life was great, even under balanced.

I guess Intel's first ABGN chip isnt very well optimized for 802.11n yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was having horrible battery life, even on power saver, on my XPS1330.  I knew it wasn&#8217;t Vista as I had ran Vista with great battery life on an older Dell laptop. </p>
<p>After a couple months of just figuring my new notebook was a power hog, I did some testing and found out it was because I was using 802.11n.</p>
<p>When I switched to 802.11g or 802.11b, my battery life was great, even under balanced.</p>
<p>I guess Intel&#8217;s first ABGN chip isnt very well optimized for 802.11n yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
