<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: 64-Bit Computers are on the Rise</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/64-bit-computers-are-on-the-rise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/64-bit-computers-are-on-the-rise/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/64-bit-computers-are-on-the-rise/#comment-141468</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:17:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14253#comment-141468</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141427&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tonino wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The transition from 16 to 32-bit was much faster/easier right?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yes, it was faster, but there also weren&#039;t as many computers out there. Now there are so many more peripherals, hardware, and software that they need to have switch over to the 64-bit world.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141427" rel="nofollow">Tonino wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>The transition from 16 to 32-bit was much faster/easier right?</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, it was faster, but there also weren&#8217;t as many computers out there. Now there are so many more peripherals, hardware, and software that they need to have switch over to the 64-bit world.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tinhed</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/64-bit-computers-are-on-the-rise/#comment-141440</link> <dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:02:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14253#comment-141440</guid> <description>A 64 bit pc has no significant advantage over 32 bit unless you are talking about very large disk space and more than 3 gb of RAM but its definitely the way 2 go.BTW long before Vista 64 bit, we had 64 bit linux distro&#039;s and i have to say that Linux has shown the way once again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 64 bit pc has no significant advantage over 32 bit unless you are talking about very large disk space and more than 3 gb of RAM but its definitely the way 2 go.</p><p>BTW long before Vista 64 bit, we had 64 bit linux distro&#8217;s and i have to say that Linux has shown the way once again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tonino</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/64-bit-computers-are-on-the-rise/#comment-141427</link> <dc:creator>Tonino</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:11:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14253#comment-141427</guid> <description>Well, it&#039;s about friggin&#039; time. We&#039;ve had 64-bit computers for ages but still running 32-bit OSs. It doesn&#039;t make sense and this should have come much faster. The transition from 16 to 32-bit was much faster/easier right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s about friggin&#8217; time.<br /> We&#8217;ve had 64-bit computers for ages but still running 32-bit OSs.<br /> It doesn&#8217;t make sense and this should have come much faster.<br /> The transition from 16 to 32-bit was much faster/easier right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/64-bit-computers-are-on-the-rise/#comment-141412</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14253#comment-141412</guid> <description>Wow, a laptop that comes equipped with 4GB of RAM at a retail store is pretty crazy. I&#039;m surprised they&#039;d put that much in one of their laptops. Normally they&#039;d want the &quot;Geek Squad&quot; to upgrade it for you at an outrageous price.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a laptop that comes equipped with 4GB of RAM at a retail store is pretty crazy. I&#8217;m surprised they&#8217;d put that much in one of their laptops. Normally they&#8217;d want the &#8220;Geek Squad&#8221; to upgrade it for you at an outrageous price.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bamboo</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/64-bit-computers-are-on-the-rise/#comment-141408</link> <dc:creator>Bamboo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:23:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14253#comment-141408</guid> <description>I have been running Vista64 since last Oct., and except for ZoneAlarm, I haven&#039;t had any problems finding what I wanted.  And Comodo Firewall is just as good, plus I have a hardware firewall in my router.I take that back, the program CoreTemp was not 64 ready for a few months after I built, but they updated and works great now.Also, I just bought a laptop for my wife last month at BestBuy (it was on sale really cheap) and it came with Vista64.  A Toshibia with 4 gigs of RAM.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been running Vista64 since last Oct., and except for ZoneAlarm, I haven&#8217;t had any problems finding what I wanted.  And Comodo Firewall is just as good, plus I have a hardware firewall in my router.</p><p>I take that back, the program CoreTemp was not 64 ready for a few months after I built, but they updated and works great now.</p><p>Also, I just bought a laptop for my wife last month at BestBuy (it was on sale really cheap) and it came with Vista64.  A Toshibia with 4 gigs of RAM.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 243/264 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-25 22:02:38 -->
