<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: A Hint At What The New Froogle Will Look Like?</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: colbert</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/#comment-30373</link> <dc:creator>colbert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 01:15:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/29/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/#comment-30373</guid> <description>Google has to make sure that duplicate listings don&#039;t spoil the lot over there....It does look fine with all the Ajax functions now</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has to make sure that duplicate listings don&#8217;t spoil the lot over there&#8230;.It does look fine with all the Ajax functions now</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/#comment-30347</link> <dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:12:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/29/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/#comment-30347</guid> <description>I agree that searching a non-indexed database (Froogle&#039;s DB comes from submitted content by sellers) is much more appropriate, as the world of online shopping contains a lot of crap. They could even advance the search, allowing you to only see results from shops that have Google Checkout or are VeriSign secured etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that searching a non-indexed database (Froogle&#8217;s DB comes from submitted content by sellers) is much more appropriate, as the world of online shopping contains a lot of crap. They could even advance the search, allowing you to only see results from shops that have Google Checkout or are VeriSign secured etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 210/231 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-25 22:33:37 -->
