<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Hint At What The New Froogle Will Look Like?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:01:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: colbert</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-30373</link>
		<dc:creator>colbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 01:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/29/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/#comment-30373</guid>
		<description>Google has to make sure that duplicate listings don&#039;t spoil the lot over there....It does look fine with all the Ajax functions now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has to make sure that duplicate listings don&#8217;t spoil the lot over there&#8230;.It does look fine with all the Ajax functions now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-30347</link>
		<dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/29/a-hint-at-what-the-new-froogle-will-look-like/#comment-30347</guid>
		<description>I agree that searching a non-indexed database (Froogle&#039;s DB comes from submitted content by sellers) is much more appropriate, as the world of online shopping contains a lot of crap. They could even advance the search, allowing you to only see results from shops that have Google Checkout or are VeriSign secured etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that searching a non-indexed database (Froogle&#8217;s DB comes from submitted content by sellers) is much more appropriate, as the world of online shopping contains a lot of crap. They could even advance the search, allowing you to only see results from shops that have Google Checkout or are VeriSign secured etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
