<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Dreamweaver CS4 Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/adobe-dreamweaver-cs4-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/adobe-dreamweaver-cs4-beta/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/adobe-dreamweaver-cs4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-138511</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12811#comment-138511</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138479&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PhoenixP3K wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t feel bad to say that I still use MACROMEDIA Dreamweaver 8. You won’t see me dash more cash on that product line any time soon!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
You&#039;re only one version behind the current one, and so I wouldn&#039;t say that you&#039;re really out-dated. Heck, I wouldn&#039;t upgrade to CS3 either if I had version 8. It is funny to think that it was once called Macromedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138479" rel="nofollow">PhoenixP3K wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I don’t feel bad to say that I still use MACROMEDIA Dreamweaver 8. You won’t see me dash more cash on that product line any time soon!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>You&#8217;re only one version behind the current one, and so I wouldn&#8217;t say that you&#8217;re really out-dated. Heck, I wouldn&#8217;t upgrade to CS3 either if I had version 8. It is funny to think that it was once called Macromedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoenixP3K</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/adobe-dreamweaver-cs4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-138479</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoenixP3K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12811#comment-138479</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t feel bad to say that I still use MACROMEDIA Dreamweaver 8. You won&#039;t see me dash more cash on that product line any time soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t feel bad to say that I still use MACROMEDIA Dreamweaver 8. You won&#8217;t see me dash more cash on that product line any time soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/adobe-dreamweaver-cs4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-138466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12811#comment-138466</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138423&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;brian wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;the live view alone will be worth the upgrade for me. I hope they fix the “the text you are trying to import is very large and may take some time, are you sure you want to continue”….2 seconds later it finishes. That was probably a good warning for a p3 400mhz, but when you are running a dual core with 4 gigs of ram… come on dw.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
The Live View does sound pretty nice, but what I normally do anyway is open the site I&#039;m working on in a browser and have it automatically refresh at a given interval. Well, that&#039;s what I do when coding with a text editor at least.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-138442&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I absolutely hate the new UI and hope they change their mind about it (but I suppose not). Some of my other programs hook into the title bar and now they can’t or it looks ugly. The icons are all B&amp;W now, so harder to see which one I need as they all look the same. I loved their previous UI, why do they always have to come up with a new one?!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Yeah, I prefer the CS3 interface, too. My guess is that this could just be something that takes a little getting used to, but I always hate applications that don&#039;t conform to the standard border that&#039;s placed around an application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138423" rel="nofollow">brian wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>the live view alone will be worth the upgrade for me. I hope they fix the “the text you are trying to import is very large and may take some time, are you sure you want to continue”….2 seconds later it finishes. That was probably a good warning for a p3 400mhz, but when you are running a dual core with 4 gigs of ram… come on dw.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>The Live View does sound pretty nice, but what I normally do anyway is open the site I&#8217;m working on in a browser and have it automatically refresh at a given interval. Well, that&#8217;s what I do when coding with a text editor at least.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-138442" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I absolutely hate the new UI and hope they change their mind about it (but I suppose not). Some of my other programs hook into the title bar and now they can’t or it looks ugly. The icons are all B&amp;W now, so harder to see which one I need as they all look the same. I loved their previous UI, why do they always have to come up with a new one?!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yeah, I prefer the CS3 interface, too. My guess is that this could just be something that takes a little getting used to, but I always hate applications that don&#8217;t conform to the standard border that&#8217;s placed around an application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/adobe-dreamweaver-cs4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-138442</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12811#comment-138442</guid>
		<description>I absolutely hate the new UI and hope they change their mind about it (but I suppose not). Some of my other programs hook into the title bar and now they can&#039;t or it looks ugly. The icons are all B&amp;W now, so harder to see which one I need as they all look the same. I loved their previous UI, why do they always have to come up with a new one?!

Using WebKit for Live View is a great step however! For some reason my site didn&#039;t look like it should in Live View though, while it looks fine in Safari. Very strange.

I also like the related files option, although I am now missing the keyboard shortcut for switching between files. I used to use ctrl-tab, but that only works between tabs and not between related files. The extra mouse movement is not good.. Plus they should improve the related files option to also recognize conditional comments imho.

SVN integration is something I have been waiting for as well. Didn&#039;t test it yet, but that&#039;s great :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely hate the new UI and hope they change their mind about it (but I suppose not). Some of my other programs hook into the title bar and now they can&#8217;t or it looks ugly. The icons are all B&amp;W now, so harder to see which one I need as they all look the same. I loved their previous UI, why do they always have to come up with a new one?!</p>
<p>Using WebKit for Live View is a great step however! For some reason my site didn&#8217;t look like it should in Live View though, while it looks fine in Safari. Very strange.</p>
<p>I also like the related files option, although I am now missing the keyboard shortcut for switching between files. I used to use ctrl-tab, but that only works between tabs and not between related files. The extra mouse movement is not good.. Plus they should improve the related files option to also recognize conditional comments imho.</p>
<p>SVN integration is something I have been waiting for as well. Didn&#8217;t test it yet, but that&#8217;s great <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/adobe-dreamweaver-cs4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-138423</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12811#comment-138423</guid>
		<description>the live view alone will be worth the upgrade for me. I hope they fix the &quot;the text you are trying to import is very large and may take some time, are you sure you want to continue&quot;....2 seconds later it finishes. That was probably a good warning for a p3 400mhz, but when you are running a dual core with 4 gigs of ram... come on dw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the live view alone will be worth the upgrade for me. I hope they fix the &#8220;the text you are trying to import is very large and may take some time, are you sure you want to continue&#8221;&#8230;.2 seconds later it finishes. That was probably a good warning for a p3 400mhz, but when you are running a dual core with 4 gigs of ram&#8230; come on dw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
