<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Amazon (Alexa) vs. Statsaholic</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/amazon-alexa-vs-statsaholic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/amazon-alexa-vs-statsaholic/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/amazon-alexa-vs-statsaholic/#comment-94637</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:41:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/20/amazon-alexa-vs-statsaholic/#comment-94637</guid> <description>Amazon is just too worried that another site is using their data but providing their information in a better format than they can themselves. When Alexa overhauled the interface a few months back I remember seeing them implement a lot of the things people loved about Statsaholic. I&#039;m sure at that time they thought they would draw back the people who stopped using Alexa. Now they are just getting worried.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon is just too worried that another site is using their data but providing their information in a better format than they can themselves. When Alexa overhauled the interface a few months back I remember seeing them implement a lot of the things people loved about Statsaholic. I&#8217;m sure at that time they thought they would draw back the people who stopped using Alexa. Now they are just getting worried.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ashley</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/amazon-alexa-vs-statsaholic/#comment-94572</link> <dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:23:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/20/amazon-alexa-vs-statsaholic/#comment-94572</guid> <description>I&#039;m now hearing that Amazon did offer to acquire Statsaholic-- but I haven&#039;t heard much else as far as details go. Definitely would have solved the problem.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now hearing that Amazon did offer to acquire Statsaholic&#8211; but I haven&#8217;t heard much else as far as details go. Definitely would have solved the problem.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/amazon-alexa-vs-statsaholic/#comment-94569</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:57:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/20/amazon-alexa-vs-statsaholic/#comment-94569</guid> <description>Amazon should have just bought Statsaholic, problem solved.  I&#039;m sure it would have been cheaper than the legal fees.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon should have just bought Statsaholic, problem solved.  I&#8217;m sure it would have been cheaper than the legal fees.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 215/234 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 00:49:13 -->
