Comments on: Apple Updates MacBook Line http://cybernetnews.com/apple-updates-macbook-line/ Technology News Sat, 26 May 2012 08:09:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Ryanhttp://cybernetnews.com/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132229 Ryan Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:44:12 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/26/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132229 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132170" rel="nofollow">joeldm wrote:</a><blockquote>Facts no longer matter, everyone seems to be writing based on a “feeling” and not one backed up by any facts either!</blockquote></div> It's funny that you say that, because it is actually true. A lot of stuff these days is based upon the gut feeling of an individual. joeldm wrote:
Facts no longer matter, everyone seems to be writing based on a “feeling” and not one backed up by any facts either!

It’s funny that you say that, because it is actually true. A lot of stuff these days is based upon the gut feeling of an individual.

]]> By: joeldmhttp://cybernetnews.com/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132170 joeldm Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:19:03 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/26/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132170 The average refresh rate for Apple laptops has historically been 6-9 months. This was just under 9 months. I was looking at an article related to this that said that Apple was 81 days "late" with this release. Based on what? His girlfriend? It's amazing the level of reporting in technology (and really everywhere today). Facts no longer matter, everyone seems to be writing based on a "feeling" and not one backed up by any facts either!Sheesh! joeldm The average refresh rate for Apple laptops has historically been 6-9 months. This was just under 9 months. I was looking at an article related to this that said that Apple was 81 days “late” with this release. Based on what? His girlfriend? It’s amazing the level of reporting in technology (and really everywhere today). Facts no longer matter, everyone seems to be writing based on a “feeling” and not one backed up by any facts either!

Sheesh!
joeldm

]]> By: Googlehttp://cybernetnews.com/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132164 Google Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:52:49 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/26/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132164 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132071" rel="nofollow">Ashley wrote:</a><blockquote><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132065" rel="nofollow">Google wrote:</a><blockquote>Took um long enough.</blockquote></div>Really, you thought it was a long time? Here I was surprised at how fast they added this feature after just introducing it on the MacBook Air.</blockquote></div>When they didn't do it at Macworld people were a little shocked and since then people have been waiting what has seemed like forever for this. Ashley wrote:
Google wrote:
Took um long enough.

Really, you thought it was a long time? Here I was surprised at how fast they added this feature after just introducing it on the MacBook Air.

When they didn’t do it at Macworld people were a little shocked and since then people have been waiting what has seemed like forever for this.

]]> By: Ashleyhttp://cybernetnews.com/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132071 Ashley Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:18:16 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/26/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132071 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132065" rel="nofollow">Google wrote:</a><blockquote>Took um long enough.</blockquote></div> Really, you thought it was a long time? Here I was surprised at how fast they added this feature after just introducing it on the MacBook Air. Google wrote:
Took um long enough.

Really, you thought it was a long time? Here I was surprised at how fast they added this feature after just introducing it on the MacBook Air.

]]> By: Googlehttp://cybernetnews.com/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132065 Google Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:31:28 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/26/apple-updates-macbook-line/#comment-132065 Took um long enough. Took um long enough.

]]>