<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Apple Wins, Bloggers Lose&#8230;</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127624</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127624</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-127110&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kent Bunn wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t think for a second that they should have been allowed to keep the identity secret.  The person violated a contract, and broke the law in doing so.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I don&#039;t really think that it is ThinkSecret&#039;s place to tell that information to Apple though. Sure the Apple employee&#039;s shouldn&#039;t be doing that, but it&#039;s not like they revealed manufacturer plans for the iPhone before it was released, or leaked source code.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-127110" rel="nofollow">Kent Bunn wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I don’t think for a second that they should have been allowed to keep the identity secret.  The person violated a contract, and broke the law in doing so.</p></blockquote></div><p>I don&#8217;t really think that it is ThinkSecret&#8217;s place to tell that information to Apple though. Sure the Apple employee&#8217;s shouldn&#8217;t be doing that, but it&#8217;s not like they revealed manufacturer plans for the iPhone before it was released, or leaked source code.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127302</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:40:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127302</guid> <description>I honestly think contrary to Microsoft&#039;s evil image, that they respect momentum behind their under-development products.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly think contrary to Microsoft&#8217;s evil image, that they respect momentum behind their under-development products.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryver</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127169</link> <dc:creator>Ryver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:46:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127169</guid> <description>APPLE IDIOTS!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APPLE IDIOTS!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Amak</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127161</link> <dc:creator>Amak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:15:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127161</guid> <description>Apple made a BIG mistake. Sites like that can generate lots of hype, and hype sells. Look at the iPod, iPhone etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple made a BIG mistake. Sites like that can generate lots of hype, and hype sells. Look at the iPod, iPhone etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tinhed</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127111</link> <dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:03:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127111</guid> <description>Microsoft and Apple.2 US creations More Hate worthy than even the Al-Qaeda and Saddam combined.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft and Apple.</p><p>2 US creations More Hate worthy than even the Al-Qaeda and Saddam combined.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kent Bunn</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127110</link> <dc:creator>Kent Bunn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:00:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127110</guid> <description>A couple things.While I think it was probably pretty misguided of Apple to be so controlling of their IP.  I don&#039;t completely fault them for wanting to release information on their schedule rather than on whenever TS thought it should be out there.However.  I also don&#039;t think that shield laws should apply at all to cases like this.  When TS accepted and published the information, they KNEW that they were cooperating in someone&#039;s willful violation of the nondisclosure agreement that the person had signed with Apple.  And in my mind, TS was almost as culpable in that violation.  I don&#039;t think for a second that they should have been allowed to keep the identity secret.  The person violated a contract, and broke the law in doing so.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple things.</p><p>While I think it was probably pretty misguided of Apple to be so controlling of their IP.  I don&#8217;t completely fault them for wanting to release information on their schedule rather than on whenever TS thought it should be out there.</p><p>However.  I also don&#8217;t think that shield laws should apply at all to cases like this.  When TS accepted and published the information, they KNEW that they were cooperating in someone&#8217;s willful violation of the nondisclosure agreement that the person had signed with Apple.  And in my mind, TS was almost as culpable in that violation.  I don&#8217;t think for a second that they should have been allowed to keep the identity secret.  The person violated a contract, and broke the law in doing so.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: epiac1216</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127107</link> <dc:creator>epiac1216</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127107</guid> <description>I totally agree with you.  Secrecy about products and/or services creates a certain distrust amongst users.  I like to find out everything I can about the products/services I use and think securing factual information is fair play.We are living in the &quot;Information Age&quot; where the most valuable asset a company has is shared information.  Bloggers find fertile ground by providing information to its readers.  If you seal information, what do we have?  A Gestapo regime?I honestly think Apple went too far, and it&#039;s a sad moment for bloggers.Regards,Omar.-</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you.  Secrecy about products and/or services creates a certain distrust amongst users.  I like to find out everything I can about the products/services I use and think securing factual information is fair play.</p><p>We are living in the &#8220;Information Age&#8221; where the most valuable asset a company has is shared information.  Bloggers find fertile ground by providing information to its readers.  If you seal information, what do we have?  A Gestapo regime?</p><p>I honestly think Apple went too far, and it&#8217;s a sad moment for bloggers.</p><p>Regards,</p><p>Omar.-</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 259/278 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 03:04:25 -->
