<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Wins, Bloggers Lose&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127624</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127624</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-127110&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kent Bunn wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I don’t think for a second that they should have been allowed to keep the identity secret.  The person violated a contract, and broke the law in doing so.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I don&#039;t really think that it is ThinkSecret&#039;s place to tell that information to Apple though. Sure the Apple employee&#039;s shouldn&#039;t be doing that, but it&#039;s not like they revealed manufacturer plans for the iPhone before it was released, or leaked source code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-127110" rel="nofollow">Kent Bunn wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I don’t think for a second that they should have been allowed to keep the identity secret.  The person violated a contract, and broke the law in doing so.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I don&#8217;t really think that it is ThinkSecret&#8217;s place to tell that information to Apple though. Sure the Apple employee&#8217;s shouldn&#8217;t be doing that, but it&#8217;s not like they revealed manufacturer plans for the iPhone before it was released, or leaked source code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127302</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127302</guid>
		<description>I honestly think contrary to Microsoft&#039;s evil image, that they respect momentum behind their under-development products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly think contrary to Microsoft&#8217;s evil image, that they respect momentum behind their under-development products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryver</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127169</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127169</guid>
		<description>APPLE IDIOTS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APPLE IDIOTS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amak</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127161</link>
		<dc:creator>Amak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127161</guid>
		<description>Apple made a BIG mistake. Sites like that can generate lots of hype, and hype sells. Look at the iPod, iPhone etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple made a BIG mistake. Sites like that can generate lots of hype, and hype sells. Look at the iPod, iPhone etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127111</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127111</guid>
		<description>Microsoft and Apple.

2 US creations More Hate worthy than even the Al-Qaeda and Saddam combined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft and Apple.</p>
<p>2 US creations More Hate worthy than even the Al-Qaeda and Saddam combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Bunn</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127110</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Bunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127110</guid>
		<description>A couple things.

While I think it was probably pretty misguided of Apple to be so controlling of their IP.  I don&#039;t completely fault them for wanting to release information on their schedule rather than on whenever TS thought it should be out there.

However.  I also don&#039;t think that shield laws should apply at all to cases like this.  When TS accepted and published the information, they KNEW that they were cooperating in someone&#039;s willful violation of the nondisclosure agreement that the person had signed with Apple.  And in my mind, TS was almost as culpable in that violation.  I don&#039;t think for a second that they should have been allowed to keep the identity secret.  The person violated a contract, and broke the law in doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple things.</p>
<p>While I think it was probably pretty misguided of Apple to be so controlling of their IP.  I don&#8217;t completely fault them for wanting to release information on their schedule rather than on whenever TS thought it should be out there.</p>
<p>However.  I also don&#8217;t think that shield laws should apply at all to cases like this.  When TS accepted and published the information, they KNEW that they were cooperating in someone&#8217;s willful violation of the nondisclosure agreement that the person had signed with Apple.  And in my mind, TS was almost as culpable in that violation.  I don&#8217;t think for a second that they should have been allowed to keep the identity secret.  The person violated a contract, and broke the law in doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epiac1216</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/comment-page-1/#comment-127107</link>
		<dc:creator>epiac1216</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/20/apple-wins-bloggers-lose/#comment-127107</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you.  Secrecy about products and/or services creates a certain distrust amongst users.  I like to find out everything I can about the products/services I use and think securing factual information is fair play.

We are living in the &quot;Information Age&quot; where the most valuable asset a company has is shared information.  Bloggers find fertile ground by providing information to its readers.  If you seal information, what do we have?  A Gestapo regime?

I honestly think Apple went too far, and it&#039;s a sad moment for bloggers.

Regards,

Omar.-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you.  Secrecy about products and/or services creates a certain distrust amongst users.  I like to find out everything I can about the products/services I use and think securing factual information is fair play.</p>
<p>We are living in the &#8220;Information Age&#8221; where the most valuable asset a company has is shared information.  Bloggers find fertile ground by providing information to its readers.  If you seal information, what do we have?  A Gestapo regime?</p>
<p>I honestly think Apple went too far, and it&#8217;s a sad moment for bloggers.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Omar.-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
