Comments on: April Browser Stats were Incorrect http://cybernetnews.com/april-browser-stats-were-incorrect/ Technology News Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:30:02 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Change http://cybernetnews.com/april-browser-stats-were-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-137936 Change Thu, 15 May 2008 16:26:13 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12525#comment-137936 Shouldn't it be listed as Gecko then or something? Or their own user-agent? But even if they shouldn't, a 100% rise is quite significant. I'm eager to see the following stats, so we can see if this trend continues. Shouldn’t it be listed as Gecko then or something? Or their own user-agent? But even if they shouldn’t, a 100% rise is quite significant. I’m eager to see the following stats, so we can see if this trend continues.

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/april-browser-stats-were-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-137762 Ryan Fri, 09 May 2008 20:01:10 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12525#comment-137762 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-137719" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><blockquote>Still wonder why the Mozilla stats nearly doubled though.. how is that possible?!</blockquote></div> I was kind of wondering that as well. Maybe some other browsers have started to use that as the backend and the starts are therefore being combined? Change wrote:
Still wonder why the Mozilla stats nearly doubled though.. how is that possible?!

I was kind of wondering that as well. Maybe some other browsers have started to use that as the backend and the starts are therefore being combined?

]]> By: Change http://cybernetnews.com/april-browser-stats-were-incorrect/comment-page-1/#comment-137719 Change Thu, 08 May 2008 22:31:05 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12525#comment-137719 Still wonder why the Mozilla stats nearly doubled though.. how is that possible?! Still wonder why the Mozilla stats nearly doubled though.. how is that possible?!

]]>