<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Are we going to see Safari in Windows? Nah&#8230;</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-98828</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:41:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-98828</guid> <description>Wow, I had completely forgotten about this post, but it is funny how spot on it was. I heard that Apple will be offering Safari as an additional download option when users get iTunes, which should definitely help their marketshare.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I had completely forgotten about this post, but it is funny how spot on it was. I heard that Apple will be offering Safari as an additional download option when users get iTunes, which should definitely help their marketshare.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-98643</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:22:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-98643</guid> <description>&lt;p&gt;Well it seems that this was one rumor that actually paned out. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/15/1-million-copies-of-safari-for-windows-downloaded/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Over 1 million copies of Safari for Windows was downloaded in 48 hours.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it seems that this was one rumor that actually paned out. [<a href='http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/06/15/1-million-copies-of-safari-for-windows-downloaded/' rel='nofollow'>tech.cybernetnews.com</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-86147</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:12:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-86147</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-85972&quot;&gt;SLA wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Safari was forked from Konqueror some time ago, and now they are developed separately - one by KDE community, and other by Apple Inc. So those two browsers&#039; rendering engines are NOT the same. They are similar, but different.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yeah, definitely. Safari has actually come a long ways in terms of development and they were supposed to share any advancements with the KDE team...but they seem to have forgotten to do that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-85972">SLA wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Safari was forked from Konqueror some time ago, and now they are developed separately &#8211; one by KDE community, and other by Apple Inc. So those two browsers&#8217; rendering engines are NOT the same. They are similar, but different.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yeah, definitely. Safari has actually come a long ways in terms of development and they were supposed to share any advancements with the KDE team&#8230;but they seem to have forgotten to do that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SLA</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-85972</link> <dc:creator>SLA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:05:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-85972</guid> <description>Safari was forked from Konqueror some time ago, and now they are developed separately - one by KDE community, and other by Apple Inc. So those two browsers&#039; rendering engines are NOT the same. They are similar, but different.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari was forked from Konqueror some time ago, and now they are developed separately &#8211; one by KDE community, and other by Apple Inc. So those two browsers&#8217; rendering engines are NOT the same. They are similar, but different.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-82557</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-82557</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-81540&quot;&gt;Mo wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Also not to mention that Apple&#039;s Safari web browser is based on KHTML which was done by those wonderful people at KDE and looks like they are on the ball for having a fully complaint browser on the market right now.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yep, I think they should have a Windows version of Konqueror out in no time...which would prove that Apple should be able to port Safari over to Windows without too much trouble.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-81540">Mo wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Also not to mention that Apple&#8217;s Safari web browser is based on KHTML which was done by those wonderful people at KDE and looks like they are on the ball for having a fully complaint browser on the market right now.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yep, I think they should have a Windows version of Konqueror out in no time&#8230;which would prove that Apple should be able to port Safari over to Windows without too much trouble.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mo</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-81540</link> <dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:21:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-81540</guid> <description>Well that would be cool as I can test my sites, but it looks like this might not happen so I am going to have to rely on Swift coming into to beta as it&#039;s is still too early for the browser.Also not to mention that Apple&#039;s Safari web browser is based on KHTML which was done by those wonderful people at KDE and looks like they are on the ball for having a fully complaint browser on the market right now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that would be cool as I can test my sites, but it looks like this might not happen so I am going to have to rely on Swift coming into to beta as it&#8217;s is still too early for the browser.</p><p>Also not to mention that Apple&#8217;s Safari web browser is based on KHTML which was done by those wonderful people at KDE and looks like they are on the ball for having a fully complaint browser on the market right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bunnyhero</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-78422</link> <dc:creator>bunnyhero</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:13:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-78422</guid> <description>i doubt we will ever see safari on windows, but it is worth nothing that &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;adobe&#039;s apollo&lt;/a&gt; will be using webkit for html rendering, and that will be running on windows (and mac)...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i doubt we will ever see safari on windows, but it is worth nothing that [<a href='http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo' rel='nofollow'>labs.adobe.com</a>] will be using webkit for html rendering, and that will be running on windows (and mac)&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-78384</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:31:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/01/12/are-we-going-to-see-safari-in-windows-nah/#comment-78384</guid> <description>I&#039;m more interest in this observation:&lt;blockquote&gt;One or more Web service providers may introduce their own browsing solution that ties to their services&lt;/blockquote&gt;What web service providers are they referring too?  Do they have someone specific in mind or is this just a hypothetical.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more interest in this observation:</p><blockquote><p>One or more Web service providers may introduce their own browsing solution that ties to their services</p></blockquote><p>What web service providers are they referring too?  Do they have someone specific in mind or is this just a hypothetical.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 270/289 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 08:07:43 -->
