<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Greasemonkey Scripts: Google Reader Filters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Syahid A.</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-135163</link>
		<dc:creator>Syahid A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/11/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/#comment-135163</guid>
		<description>Just what I was looking for in Google Reader. Awesome tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I was looking for in Google Reader. Awesome tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osias</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-132930</link>
		<dc:creator>Osias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/11/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/#comment-132930</guid>
		<description>I thought about that. Indeed, the security issue could be the same one from today, with local greasemonkey scripts, and they could on top of that add more security. BUT... when something goes wrong, people will start to blame it on google instead of themselves. 
 
We also could make the thing ourselves if cross-site scripting were allowed by the browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought about that. Indeed, the security issue could be the same one from today, with local greasemonkey scripts, and they could on top of that add more security. BUT&#8230; when something goes wrong, people will start to blame it on google instead of themselves. </p>
<p>We also could make the thing ourselves if cross-site scripting were allowed by the browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-132906</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/11/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/#comment-132906</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-132870&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Osias wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Google should include, instead, something like “greasemonkey anywhere”: we should be able to install scripts on our profile.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Now that would be insanely sweet, but I think there are a lot of security concerns with that. They could probably do it rather easily, but the repercussions would probably be huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132870" rel="nofollow">Osias wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Google should include, instead, something like “greasemonkey anywhere”: we should be able to install scripts on our profile.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Now that would be insanely sweet, but I think there are a lot of security concerns with that. They could probably do it rather easily, but the repercussions would probably be huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osias</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-132870</link>
		<dc:creator>Osias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/11/best-greasemonkey-scripts-google-reader-filters/#comment-132870</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using since 30 minutes ago and loving!

But I don&#039;t think Google Reader must include this. Google should include, instead, something like &quot;greasemonkey anywhere&quot;: we should be able to install scripts on our profile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using since 30 minutes ago and loving!</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think Google Reader must include this. Google should include, instead, something like &#8220;greasemonkey anywhere&#8221;: we should be able to install scripts on our profile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
