<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FB</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-127428</link>
		<dc:creator>FB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 18:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-127428</guid>
		<description>Vista is the worst Windows ever. Even worse than Millenium. It really deserves number one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista is the worst Windows ever. Even worse than Millenium. It really deserves number one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjay</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126993</link>
		<dc:creator>arjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126993</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-126991&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pieter wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The new My Yahoo! is pretty sweet though.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I didn&#039;t see Yahoo on the list until you said that. WHY is Yahoo there? The new messenger versions are great, a little unstable, but both a-ok. I went back to 8.1 because I like the &quot;classic skin&quot; mode, not the special skins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-126991" rel="nofollow">Pieter wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>The new My Yahoo! is pretty sweet though.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see Yahoo on the list until you said that. WHY is Yahoo there? The new messenger versions are great, a little unstable, but both a-ok. I went back to 8.1 because I like the &#8220;classic skin&#8221; mode, not the special skins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126991</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126991</guid>
		<description>The new My Yahoo! is pretty sweet though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new My Yahoo! is pretty sweet though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126972</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126972</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-126865&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michael Dobrofsky wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve been critical of Vista, naturally, but it doesn’t deserve #1 for biggest disappointments, I agree guys. That’s just not fair at all. Yes, Ultimate Extras DOES deserve to be #1, absolutely, but Vista itself, despite all its previous issues and disappointments, is solid.

Shows the listmakers just went with the easy pick.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Wow Michael! I was surprised to see you use &quot;Vista&quot; and &quot;solid&quot; in the same sentence. :)

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-126861&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;arjay wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Is it just me or does selling a lot mean disappointment for PCWorld? Quick, stop patronizing PCWorld so they’ll be a big success. Pft.  :roll:&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Yeah, this has ruined some of their credibility with me.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-126902&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;willy wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;How about Cybernet’s “15 Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007” list?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
We&#039;ll have something similar in our &quot;CyberNet Awards&quot; series that we&#039;ve started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-126865" rel="nofollow">Michael Dobrofsky wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I’ve been critical of Vista, naturally, but it doesn’t deserve #1 for biggest disappointments, I agree guys. That’s just not fair at all. Yes, Ultimate Extras DOES deserve to be #1, absolutely, but Vista itself, despite all its previous issues and disappointments, is solid.</p>
<p>Shows the listmakers just went with the easy pick.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Wow Michael! I was surprised to see you use &#8220;Vista&#8221; and &#8220;solid&#8221; in the same sentence. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-126861" rel="nofollow">arjay wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Is it just me or does selling a lot mean disappointment for PCWorld? Quick, stop patronizing PCWorld so they’ll be a big success. Pft.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yeah, this has ruined some of their credibility with me.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-126902" rel="nofollow">willy wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>How about Cybernet’s “15 Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007” list?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>We&#8217;ll have something similar in our &#8220;CyberNet Awards&#8221; series that we&#8217;ve started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126915</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126915</guid>
		<description>How ridiculous! Office 2007 is one of the best and most full-featured releases, not just from an interface point of view. I&#039;m one of those users who knows the ins and outs of Office and yet I didn&#039;t find re-learning so difficult. There&#039;s a nice Quick Access Toolbar on the top in Ribbon apps where you can easily add ANY command in pre-Office 2007-style. I&#039;m 100% sure those stupid editors only know basic stuff about Word/Excel/PowerPoint nothing more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How ridiculous! Office 2007 is one of the best and most full-featured releases, not just from an interface point of view. I&#8217;m one of those users who knows the ins and outs of Office and yet I didn&#8217;t find re-learning so difficult. There&#8217;s a nice Quick Access Toolbar on the top in Ribbon apps where you can easily add ANY command in pre-Office 2007-style. I&#8217;m 100% sure those stupid editors only know basic stuff about Word/Excel/PowerPoint nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willy</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126902</link>
		<dc:creator>willy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126902</guid>
		<description>How about Cybernet&#039;s “15 Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007” list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Cybernet&#8217;s “15 Biggest Tech Disappointments of 2007” list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleUnkn0wn</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126901</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleUnkn0wn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126901</guid>
		<description>I disagree with your argument that the addition of the 3rd party applications to Facebook was a good thing. I&#039;m so tired of seeing profiles that take 5 minutes to scroll to the bottom due to the hundreds of applications. I suppose they are ok in moderation, but nobody uses them in moderation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your argument that the addition of the 3rd party applications to Facebook was a good thing. I&#8217;m so tired of seeing profiles that take 5 minutes to scroll to the bottom due to the hundreds of applications. I suppose they are ok in moderation, but nobody uses them in moderation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126866</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126866</guid>
		<description>What the hell kind of bizzaro list is this?  I&#039;m not sure I agree with more than one of those 15!  They listed all the most well known products by MS and Apple, and then even added on general tech markets like Hi-Def, Social Networks, Internet Security...  They even said Yahoo!!!

So, the top tech magazine basically just said the entire technology industry sucks.

Not only is this bizzare, it doesn&#039;t make any sense.  Ex- PCWorld rated MS Office an 85:Very Good, calling it &quot;a worthy upgrade.&quot;

http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127919/article.html

I&#039;m with you, arjay, PCWorld sucks.  I usually go to pcmag.com when I want to see reviews.  Before it was mainly because that site is easier to find reviews on.  Now it&#039;ll also be because PCW seriously needs better perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell kind of bizzaro list is this?  I&#8217;m not sure I agree with more than one of those 15!  They listed all the most well known products by MS and Apple, and then even added on general tech markets like Hi-Def, Social Networks, Internet Security&#8230;  They even said Yahoo!!!</p>
<p>So, the top tech magazine basically just said the entire technology industry sucks.</p>
<p>Not only is this bizzare, it doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  Ex- PCWorld rated MS Office an 85:Very Good, calling it &#8220;a worthy upgrade.&#8221;</p>
<p>[<a href='http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127919/article.html' rel='nofollow'>pcworld.com</a>]</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you, arjay, PCWorld sucks.  I usually go to pcmag.com when I want to see reviews.  Before it was mainly because that site is easier to find reviews on.  Now it&#8217;ll also be because PCW seriously needs better perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dobrofsky</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126865</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dobrofsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126865</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been critical of Vista, naturally, but it doesn&#039;t deserve #1 for biggest disappointments, I agree guys. That&#039;s just not fair at all. Yes, Ultimate Extras DOES deserve to be #1, absolutely, but Vista itself, despite all its previous issues and disappointments, is solid.

Shows the listmakers just went with the easy pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been critical of Vista, naturally, but it doesn&#8217;t deserve #1 for biggest disappointments, I agree guys. That&#8217;s just not fair at all. Yes, Ultimate Extras DOES deserve to be #1, absolutely, but Vista itself, despite all its previous issues and disappointments, is solid.</p>
<p>Shows the listmakers just went with the easy pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arjay</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-126861</link>
		<dc:creator>arjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/12/17/biggest-tech-disappointments-of-2007/#comment-126861</guid>
		<description>We better put PCWorld on our own disappointment list.

I just don&#039;t get what people don&#039;t like about Vista. The only issues I had so far was my games crashing, but after patching them up, they&#039;re as good as any other game (I&#039;m still waiting for the NBA Live 08 patch, EA!). And the Vista sales went up (correct me again if I&#039;m wrong, but I remember reading it somewhere). I think the Zunes are not supposed to be there, I mean, I don&#039;t have a Zune, but people I know love it, and since it is selling then it should be a success, right?  The iPhone was selling out, so was Leopard. And people started saying that Leopard was so friggin&#039; awesome just because its not Vista. Agh. Facebook sold well too. Plenty people joining + Microsoft buys them = big bucks for Zuckerberg.

Is it just me or does selling a lot mean disappointment for PCWorld? Quick, stop patronizing PCWorld so they&#039;ll be a big success. Pft.  :roll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We better put PCWorld on our own disappointment list.</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t get what people don&#8217;t like about Vista. The only issues I had so far was my games crashing, but after patching them up, they&#8217;re as good as any other game (I&#8217;m still waiting for the NBA Live 08 patch, EA!). And the Vista sales went up (correct me again if I&#8217;m wrong, but I remember reading it somewhere). I think the Zunes are not supposed to be there, I mean, I don&#8217;t have a Zune, but people I know love it, and since it is selling then it should be a success, right?  The iPhone was selling out, so was Leopard. And people started saying that Leopard was so friggin&#8217; awesome just because its not Vista. Agh. Facebook sold well too. Plenty people joining + Microsoft buys them = big bucks for Zuckerberg.</p>
<p>Is it just me or does selling a lot mean disappointment for PCWorld? Quick, stop patronizing PCWorld so they&#8217;ll be a big success. Pft.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
