Comments on: Cheap Talk: Apple Nano-Based Phone Coming? http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/ Technology News Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102491 Ryan Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:11:37 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102491 <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-102411" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><blockquote>Can’t we hope for the price to drop over time, as well? When the Moto RAZR came out, it sold for four or five hundred bucks. Now they give the thing away!</blockquote></div> Heck, at this point they pay you to get the RAZR. The good news is that I just noticed Sprint selling a Pocket PC phone for $100 with a contract, which is a lot lower than I've ever seen. I think the Blackberry really revolutionized the mobile market and we're seeing more advanced phones selling at very lower prices. <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-102438" rel="nofollow">Thilak wrote:</a><blockquote>Looks like JP Morgan has already retracted his words. iPhone Nano is left just an imaginary cell phone. Link: <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/.....3g-flavor/</a></blockquote></div> I still think it is possible, but Apple is way too good at keeping secrets. netster007x wrote:
Can’t we hope for the price to drop over time, as well? When the Moto RAZR came out, it sold for four or five hundred bucks. Now they give the thing away!

Heck, at this point they pay you to get the RAZR. The good news is that I just noticed Sprint selling a Pocket PC phone for $100 with a contract, which is a lot lower than I’ve ever seen. I think the Blackberry really revolutionized the mobile market and we’re seeing more advanced phones selling at very lower prices.

Thilak wrote:
Looks like JP Morgan has already retracted his words. iPhone Nano is left just an imaginary cell phone.

Link: [engadgetmobile.com]

I still think it is possible, but Apple is way too good at keeping secrets.

]]> By: Thilak http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102438 Thilak Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:44:22 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102438 Looks like JP Morgan has already retracted his words. iPhone Nano is left just an imaginary cell phone. Link: http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/10/jp-morgan-retracts-iphone-nano-insinuations-hints-at-3g-flavor/ Looks like JP Morgan has already retracted his words. iPhone Nano is left just an imaginary cell phone.

Link: [engadgetmobile.com]

]]> By: Thilak http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102429 Thilak Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:39:40 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102429 We can't directly compare iPhone with an iPod. It's quite interesting to see people do so. Current iPhone already runs on flash memory, so it doesn't make any difference. Moreover, the production cost would almost be the same. We can’t directly compare iPhone with an iPod. It’s quite interesting to see people do so. Current iPhone already runs on flash memory, so it doesn’t make any difference. Moreover, the production cost would almost be the same.

]]> By: netster007x http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102411 netster007x Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:43:37 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102411 Can't we hope for the price to drop over time, as well? When the Moto RAZR came out, it sold for four or five hundred bucks. Now they give the thing away! Can’t we hope for the price to drop over time, as well? When the Moto RAZR came out, it sold for four or five hundred bucks. Now they give the thing away!

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102403 Ryan Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:51:39 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102403 <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-102386" rel="nofollow">Tinhed wrote:</a><blockquote>Wont be getting the iphone in my locality any time soon. So waiting for the LG Prada. :D</blockquote></div> You'll have to let me know how that goes, because I have heard some pretty good things about the Prada. Tinhed wrote:
Wont be getting the iphone in my locality any time soon. So waiting for the LG Prada. :D

You’ll have to let me know how that goes, because I have heard some pretty good things about the Prada.

]]> By: Ashley http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102394 Ashley Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:40:39 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102394 <div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-102383" rel="nofollow">Davin Peterson wrote:</a><blockquote>Did anybody notice at top the phone image it says Cingular instead of AT&T?</blockquote></div> The phone is just a mock-up, it's not real. At one point, all of the images showing the actual iPhone before it launched displayed Cingular as well. Davin Peterson wrote:
Did anybody notice at top the phone image it says Cingular instead of AT&T?

The phone is just a mock-up, it’s not real. At one point, all of the images showing the actual iPhone before it launched displayed Cingular as well.

]]> By: Steve http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102389 Steve Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:54:20 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102389 I probably would. As long as it functions as a phone (even without texting), ipod, and web browser, I'd be glad to drop the rest of the features on it and pay less. I probably would. As long as it functions as a phone (even without texting), ipod, and web browser, I’d be glad to drop the rest of the features on it and pay less.

]]> By: Tinhed http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102386 Tinhed Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:48:05 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102386 Wont be getting the iphone in my locality any time soon. So waiting for the LG Prada. :D Wont be getting the iphone in my locality any time soon. So waiting for the LG Prada. :D

]]> By: Davin Peterson http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102383 Davin Peterson Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:42:20 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102383 Did anybody notice at top the phone image it says Cingular instead of AT&T? Did anybody notice at top the phone image it says Cingular instead of AT&T?

]]> By: Abhishek http://cybernetnews.com/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-102381 Abhishek Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:59:38 +0000 http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/10/cheap-talk-apple-nano-based-phone-coming/#comment-102381 If the iPhone nano is in the works, I dont think that the patent is a direct clue to it. Moreover, after introducing a revolutionary multi touch technology, I think a nano would sport more than a simple rotary mechanism. Ive put in some detailed opinions in my blog here: http://abhishek-myspace.blogspot.com/2007/07/apple-iphone-nano-hoax-or-reality.html If the iPhone nano is in the works, I dont think that the patent is a direct clue to it. Moreover, after introducing a revolutionary multi touch technology, I think a nano would sport more than a simple rotary mechanism.

Ive put in some detailed opinions in my blog here:
[abhishek-myspace.blogspot.com]

]]>