<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Create Panoramic Photos with Hugin</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/#comment-142662</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:46:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14987#comment-142662</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-142659&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The technology used in most panoramic apps is the same, and so there shouldn’t be too much of a difference between them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; True, but there is a huge difference in quality between the current version of Autopano and the previous one, even though they were using the same technology. In the article you mentioned, it is also clear that Autopano is the clear winner in complex panoramas.So yes, I agree that the technology behind it is the same, but the implementation can still make a significant difference in quality.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-142659">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>The technology used in most panoramic apps is the same, and so there shouldn’t be too much of a difference between them.</p></blockquote></div><p>True, but there is a huge difference in quality between the current version of Autopano and the previous one, even though they were using the same technology. In the article you mentioned, it is also clear that Autopano is the clear winner in complex panoramas.</p><p>So yes, I agree that the technology behind it is the same, but the implementation can still make a significant difference in quality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/#comment-142659</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14987#comment-142659</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-142631&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Wow great find Ryan! WLPG is much better than I expected, getting really close to Autopano Pro. I’ll have to recommend that one to friends &amp; family if it works just as easy, need to test that :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; The technology used in most panoramic apps is the same, and so there shouldn&#039;t be too much of a difference between them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-142631" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Wow great find Ryan! WLPG is much better than I expected, getting really close to Autopano Pro. I’ll have to recommend that one to friends &amp; family if it works just as easy, need to test that <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p></blockquote></div><p>The technology used in most panoramic apps is the same, and so there shouldn&#8217;t be too much of a difference between them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/#comment-142631</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:32:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14987#comment-142631</guid> <description>Wow great find Ryan! WLPG is much better than I expected, getting really close to Autopano Pro. I&#039;ll have to recommend that one to friends &amp; family if it works just as easy, need to test that :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow great find Ryan! WLPG is much better than I expected, getting really close to Autopano Pro. I&#8217;ll have to recommend that one to friends &amp; family if it works just as easy, need to test that <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/#comment-142610</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:59:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14987#comment-142610</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-142565&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;How does it compare to Autopano Pro? That one is not free, but I find it incredible what it can do. No seams or distortion anywhere, no smudged people etc!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; It will definitely take some work to get your panoramic photos setup using Hugin, but the results are pretty good. According to this article, however, even Windows Live Photo Gallery can do as good of a job as Autopano Pro: http://www.istartedsomething.com/20080110/windows-live-photo-gallery-image-stitching-compare/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-142565" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>How does it compare to Autopano Pro? That one is not free, but I find it incredible what it can do. No seams or distortion anywhere, no smudged people etc!</p></blockquote></div><p>It will definitely take some work to get your panoramic photos setup using Hugin, but the results are pretty good. According to this article, however, even Windows Live Photo Gallery can do as good of a job as Autopano Pro:<br /> [<a href='http://www.istartedsomething.com/20080110/windows-live-photo-gallery-image-stitching-compare/' rel='nofollow'>istartedsomething.com</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Raj</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/#comment-142571</link> <dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:43:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14987#comment-142571</guid> <description>Looks Cool and its free too....Downloading it ...  Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks Cool and its free too&#8230;.</p><p>Downloading it &#8230;  Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/#comment-142565</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:08:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14987#comment-142565</guid> <description>How does it compare to Autopano Pro? That one is not free, but I find it incredible what it can do. No seams or distortion anywhere, no smudged people etc!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does it compare to Autopano Pro? That one is not free, but I find it incredible what it can do. No seams or distortion anywhere, no smudged people etc!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Dobrofsky</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/create-panoramic-photos-with-hugin/#comment-142512</link> <dc:creator>Michael Dobrofsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:42:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=14987#comment-142512</guid> <description>thanks, will check it out</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, will check it out</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 267/286 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 03:21:53 -->
