<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: CyberDays: IBM NORC Supercomputer</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: BESComputers Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Modern Computing All Began</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23422</link> <dc:creator>BESComputers Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Modern Computing All Began</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:44:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/18/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23422</guid> <description>[...] Supercomputers can handle absolutely enormous processing tasks these days and some will be approaching 1 PFLOPS (1 Peta Floating Point Operations). After a little research I found IBM&#8217;s Naval Ordnance Research Calculator (NORC) to be considered the first supercomputer. Taking a look back to the beginning of modern computing&#8230;read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supercomputers can handle absolutely enormous processing tasks these days and some will be approaching 1 PFLOPS (1 Peta Floating Point Operations). After a little research I found IBM&#8217;s Naval Ordnance Research Calculator (NORC) to be considered the first supercomputer. Taking a look back to the beginning of modern computing&#8230;read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23363</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/18/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23363</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-23361&quot;&gt;cyclone fan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;wooo for iowa state!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; You must live near me because our IP address is nearly identical. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-23361">cyclone fan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>wooo for iowa state!</p></blockquote></div><p>You must live near me because our IP address is nearly identical. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cyclone fan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23361</link> <dc:creator>cyclone fan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:58:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/18/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23361</guid> <description>wooo for iowa state!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wooo for iowa state!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23333</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:25:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/18/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23333</guid> <description>The CRT was not a display.  The &quot;RAM&quot; in the compuer was a cathode ray tube.  See this site: http://www.cedmagic.com/history/williams-tube.htmlThe first random access storage device for digital computers was actually the cathode ray tube. This was invented by Fred Williams at England&#039;s Manchester University in 1946 and was later used in the Manchester Mark I computer.The device operated by writing a grid of dots and dashes (later dim and bright dots) to the CRT which were sensed by the collector plate that flips up directly over the CRT. Any binary word in the display could immediately be read, instead of having to be sequentially accessed.During this same time frame in the U.S., RCA Laboratories inventor Jan Rajchman had another random access storage device under development called the Selectron Tube. This was a modified CRT where the electron beam struck a mica wafer into which a grid of nickel-plated steel eyelets was embedded. The eyelets were either charged or not charged by the electron beam to store binary data. The Selectron tube was a failure as manufacturing difficulties limited it to 256 bits of storage, compared to the 2048 bits for the Williams tube of that time. Rajchman went on to do research on core memory, which itself ultimately made the Williams tube obsolete.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CRT was not a display.  The &#8220;RAM&#8221; in the compuer was a cathode ray tube.  See this site:<br /> [<a href='http://www.cedmagic.com/history/williams-tube.html' rel='nofollow'>cedmagic.com</a>]</p><p>The first random access storage device for digital computers was actually the cathode ray tube. This was invented by Fred Williams at England&#8217;s Manchester University in 1946 and was later used in the Manchester Mark I computer.</p><p>The device operated by writing a grid of dots and dashes (later dim and bright dots) to the CRT which were sensed by the collector plate that flips up directly over the CRT. Any binary word in the display could immediately be read, instead of having to be sequentially accessed.</p><p>During this same time frame in the U.S., RCA Laboratories inventor Jan Rajchman had another random access storage device under development called the Selectron Tube. This was a modified CRT where the electron beam struck a mica wafer into which a grid of nickel-plated steel eyelets was embedded. The eyelets were either charged or not charged by the electron beam to store binary data. The Selectron tube was a failure as manufacturing difficulties limited it to 256 bits of storage, compared to the 2048 bits for the Williams tube of that time. Rajchman went on to do research on core memory, which itself ultimately made the Williams tube obsolete.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: curtissthompson</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23043</link> <dc:creator>curtissthompson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:05:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/18/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23043</guid> <description>Well, they used CRTs, and while many are switching to LCDs (DLPs and soon OLED monitors/tvs), I&#039;ll stick with CRTs for their reliability, scalability, economically priced value I find with them, that you simply &lt;strong&gt;can not&lt;/strong&gt; find in the newer display technologies!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they used CRTs, and while many are switching to LCDs (DLPs and soon OLED monitors/tvs), I&#8217;ll stick with CRTs for their reliability, scalability, economically priced value I find with them, that you simply <strong>can not</strong> find in the newer display technologies!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23008</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:47:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/18/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-23008</guid> <description>What do you mean there is no similarities? We still have computers that take up a whole room...they are just a little bit faster. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean there is no similarities? We still have computers that take up a whole room&#8230;they are just a little bit faster. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-22950</link> <dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:21:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/09/18/cyberdays-ibm-norc-supercomputer/#comment-22950</guid> <description>It&#039;s always interesting to look back - but the machines we use today have no recognisable similarity to the machines of old - both in construction and in use.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always interesting to look back &#8211; but the machines we use today have no recognisable similarity to the machines of old &#8211; both in construction and in use.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 273/294 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 14:30:30 -->
