Comments on: CyberNet’s Extensive Firefox 2.0 Beta 1 Review

By: Ryan

Ryan — Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:54:35 +0000

That is very interesting but I don’t think we will be changing our name. We have become very popular with our current name and I think people would realize that we are not associated with the fraudulent CyberNET. After all, it isn’t like we are sitting here telling people to give us money .

-Ryan

By: John Westra

John Westra — Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:48:10 +0000

CyberNet Name Is Tainted With Fraud & Death You probably aren't aware of how the CyberNet name is tainted with the stench of fraud and death. If you were, I would think you would want to steer clear of it. I am one of many former employees, vendors and customers for whom CyberNet is a synonym for lies, fraud, embezzelment, employee intimidation, lawsuits, etc. The negative mindshare for the word CyberNet is enormous! The CEO of CyberNet was the late Barton Watson, who cheated us all by blowing his brains out with a shotgun when the house of cards he built began to crumble around him. We had all hoped to show up in court and celebrate him going to live with a roomate named 'bubba.' The following is a Google search link. It will return links to material that will provide further insight into what I have outlined above. After reading them you might consider changing your name. Google Results for CyberNet

By: James

James — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:48:45 +0000

For the Session Retore

* browser.sessionstore.enabled (bool) – Activate the service. Default is true
* browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash (bool) – Resume sessions post-crash. Default is true.
* browser.sessionstore.resume_session (bool) – Resume sessions always. Default is false.
* browser.sessionstore.resume_session_once (bool) – Resume session at the next application start, but not again. Default is false.

From [wiki.mozilla.org]

By: staying.cool / not what i expected

staying.cool / not what i expected — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:23:11 +0000

[...] Tags: firefox, staying.thoughts, techie, viewswe all probably know of the release of FF2 beta 1, if not; here’s a quick round-up of the features; with a lengthier review as well. [...]

By: Ryan

Ryan — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:31:50 +0000

I like using the portable version because I keep it on my USB drive. That way I always have my stored passwords with me on my drive instead of on a laptop that could get stolen. I look at it as being more secure, but that is my opinion.

-Ryan

By: Nader

Nader — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:29:46 +0000

Ryan
This is my 1st communication with you although I follow the site all the time. Thanks for all the insight. Just a simple question: is the portable version more secure because it leaves no traces in the PC in comparison to installing the whole thing in the system?

By: Savadeep Speaks! » Learn the outs and the ins of Firefox 2.0 Beta 1!

Savadeep Speaks! » Learn the outs and the ins of Firefox 2.0 Beta 1! — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:32:01 +0000

[...] My friends, I know many of you use Firefox. And for you, I have some news of great proportions! It was of today that I saw this utmost good review of Firefox 2.0 Beta 1! Even an Opera user such as myself is of much concern with the developments of Firefox. I have not yet used this beta, but reading this review has much indeed put me in the frame of mind to try it out! [...]

By: YABRP (Yet another browser-related post) - Ranting Maniac

YABRP (Yet another browser-related post) - Ranting Maniac — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:50:24 +0000

[...] These are off the top of my head, you can find a full review of all the features such as this one. [...]

By: Ryan

Ryan — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:13:17 +0000

Nathaniel,

Thanks for the tip, I guess I never tried to right-click on an extension before!

-Ryan

By: Nathaniel

Nathaniel — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 18:37:45 +0000

Disabled for extensions was always available, however before it was only included in the right click menu (rather than the new buttons for individual extensions).