<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: CyberNotes: A Visual Tour of Windows 1.01 &#8211; Vista</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131732</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:44:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131732</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-131594&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chris wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is Vista’s boot screen like that…?  That’s one of the things that’s annoying me.. (although you could use the hidden bootscreen, but it still doesn’t get the logo..)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Microsoft had said that adding a bootscreen adds significantly to the boot time (I think it was a second or two). I think they are just trying to shave off as much time as possible. Personally I don&#039;t care either way whether there is a boot screen, and if my computer boots faster without one then that&#039;s what I prefer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-131594" rel="nofollow">Chris wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Why is Vista’s boot screen like that…?  That’s one of the things that’s annoying me.. (although you could use the hidden bootscreen, but it still doesn’t get the logo..)</p></blockquote></div><p>Microsoft had said that adding a bootscreen adds significantly to the boot time (I think it was a second or two). I think they are just trying to shave off as much time as possible. Personally I don&#8217;t care either way whether there is a boot screen, and if my computer boots faster without one then that&#8217;s what I prefer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jacques</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131627</link> <dc:creator>jacques</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:49:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131627</guid> <description>Times they&#039;re a changin&#039; -Dylan. I started with Dos 2 in the 80&#039;s, then big change with dos3.3, till a page turned with dos4 and his dosshell introducing the window and program links concept- 90&#039;s. Souvenirs- in testing win 1.0, 2,0. Win 3.11 -w.f.workgroups- was great in this epoch. When came the challenge of 95, new features, new designs with their new behaviour problems train. Happy indeed with Vista today. About the calculator: Still here, for free, MS Calc+, a light weight calculator for current use and multiconverter with an amazing skin for a MS product.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Times they&#8217;re a changin&#8217; -Dylan. I started with Dos 2 in the 80&#8242;s, then big change with dos3.3, till a page turned with dos4 and his dosshell introducing the window and program links concept- 90&#8242;s.<br /> Souvenirs- in testing win 1.0, 2,0. Win 3.11 -w.f.workgroups- was great in this epoch. When came the challenge of 95, new features, new designs with their new behaviour problems train.<br /> Happy indeed with Vista today.<br /> About the calculator:<br /> Still here, for free, MS Calc+, a light weight calculator for current use and multiconverter with an amazing skin for a MS product.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Syahid A.</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131626</link> <dc:creator>Syahid A.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:38:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131626</guid> <description>Personal favorite: Windows 2000, Win 98 Personal hate: Windows Me.  :P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personal favorite: Windows 2000, Win 98<br /> Personal hate: Windows Me. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131594</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:05:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131594</guid> <description>Why is Vista&#039;s boot screen like that...?  That&#039;s one of the things that&#039;s annoying me.. (although you could use the hidden bootscreen, but it still doesn&#039;t get the logo..)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Vista&#8217;s boot screen like that&#8230;?  That&#8217;s one of the things that&#8217;s annoying me.. (although you could use the hidden bootscreen, but it still doesn&#8217;t get the logo..)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Dobrofsky</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131591</link> <dc:creator>Michael Dobrofsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:02:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131591</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-131561&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;did not know there was so many versions of windows, we’re so lucky technology changed and the current windows doesn’t look like the 1.01 or 3.0&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;If you dig deep into Xp or Vista, you can still find elements of Windows 3.1 so don&#039;t think you&#039;re outta the woods just yet  ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-131561" rel="nofollow">James wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>did not know there was so many versions of windows, we’re so lucky technology changed and the current windows doesn’t look like the 1.01 or 3.0</p></blockquote></div><p>If you dig deep into Xp or Vista, you can still find elements of Windows 3.1 so don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re outta the woods just yet <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131581</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:39:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131581</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-131571&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Windows 95 was the big leap.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; It definitely was, but it also introduced a lot of problems.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-131574&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ph15h wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I owned: 95, 98, 2000, ME (sigh…), XP Professional, XP Media Center, Vista Home Premium.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I&#039;ve owned 3.11, 95, 98, 2000, Me, XP Pro, XP Media Center, Vista Business, and Vista Ultimate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-131571" rel="nofollow">Google wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Windows 95 was the big leap.</p></blockquote></div><p>It definitely was, but it also introduced a lot of problems.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-131574" rel="nofollow">ph15h wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I owned: 95, 98, 2000, ME (sigh…), XP Professional, XP Media Center, Vista Home Premium.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#8217;ve owned 3.11, 95, 98, 2000, Me, XP Pro, XP Media Center, Vista Business, and Vista Ultimate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ph15h</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131574</link> <dc:creator>ph15h</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:08:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131574</guid> <description>I owned: 95, 98, 2000, ME (sigh...), XP Professional, XP Media Center, Vista Home Premium.Guess I should buy Ultimate since me likie.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owned: 95, 98, 2000, ME (sigh&#8230;), XP Professional, XP Media Center, Vista Home Premium.</p><p>Guess I should buy Ultimate since me likie.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131571</link> <dc:creator>Google</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:19:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131571</guid> <description>Windows 95 was the big leap.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 95 was the big leap.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131561</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:45:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/02/18/cybernotes-a-visual-tour-of-windows-101-vista/#comment-131561</guid> <description>did not know there was so many versions of windows, we&#039;re so lucky technology changed and the current windows doesn&#039;t look like the 1.01 or 3.0</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did not know there was so many versions of windows, we&#8217;re so lucky technology changed and the current windows doesn&#8217;t look like the 1.01 or 3.0</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 289/308 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 07:03:23 -->
