Comments on: CyberNotes: Acid3 Browser Results http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/ Technology News Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:18:55 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Mike http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-149228 Mike Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:50:07 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-149228 I ran Opera 10 Beta build 4570 on my Jaunty Jackalope. It got a 100/100! Sadly, IE has failed again... I ran Opera 10 Beta build 4570 on my Jaunty Jackalope. It got a 100/100! Sadly, IE has failed again…

]]> By: Mr.TFM http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-133234 Mr.TFM Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:58:25 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-133234 (on Mac) Safari 3.04 39% Safari 3.1 75% WebKit (lastest Nightly) 93% Firefox 3 Beta 4 67% (on Mac)
Safari 3.04 39%
Safari 3.1 75%
WebKit (lastest Nightly) 93%
Firefox 3 Beta 4 67%

]]> By: James http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-132966 James Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:56:49 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132966 I currently get 70/100 now on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008031304 Minefield/3.0b5pre I currently get 70/100 now on Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008031304 Minefield/3.0b5pre

]]> By: Ryan http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-132767 Ryan Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:04:05 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132767 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132743" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><blockquote>My firefox 2.0.0.12 on vista got a 52?</blockquote></div> Huh, it must have gotten smarter on your machine. 8O Anonymous wrote:
My firefox 2.0.0.12 on vista got a 52?

Huh, it must have gotten smarter on your machine. 8O

]]> By: Anonymous http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-132743 Anonymous Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:23:29 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132743 My firefox 2.0.0.12 on vista got a 52? My firefox 2.0.0.12 on vista got a 52?

]]> By: James http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-132692 James Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:21:18 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132692 @beoenduser, the SeaMonkey 1.1.* is on the same 1.8 branch as Firefox 2.0 so no surprise. The upcoming SeaMonkey 2.0 will likely do better much like Firefox 3.0 as they are on the 1.9 Gecko branch. @beoenduser, the SeaMonkey 1.1.* is on the same 1.8 branch as Firefox 2.0 so no surprise. The upcoming SeaMonkey 2.0 will likely do better much like Firefox 3.0 as they are on the 1.9 Gecko branch.

]]> By: James http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-132691 James Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:19:34 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132691 The current 1.9 Trunk nightlies (where Firefox 3.0 is being developed until it branches for release) I have on Linux gets 68/100 while it is just recently reported a recent hourly can get 69/100 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008030704 Minefield/3.0b5pre The current 1.9 Trunk nightlies (where Firefox 3.0 is being developed until it branches for release) I have on Linux gets 68/100 while it is just recently reported a recent hourly can get 69/100

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008030704 Minefield/3.0b5pre

]]> By: beoenduser http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-132669 beoenduser Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:39:39 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132669 I tried it in SeaMonkey 1.1.4 on my SuSE Linux 10.0 machine and I got a 50 - Fail. :| I tried it in SeaMonkey 1.1.4 on my SuSE Linux 10.0 machine and I got a 50 – Fail. :|

]]> By: CoryC http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-132622 CoryC Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:42:08 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132622 <div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132570" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><blockquote><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-132552" rel="nofollow">CoryC wrote:</a><blockquote>IE 8 Beta 1 doesn’t pass Acid 2 or Acid 3 test. It received a 17/100 on the Acid 3 test. I thought it was supposed to pass Acid 2?</blockquote></div>It does pass Acid2. I’ve just tested it in a virtal machine and the smiley face renders perfectly fine :) Are you sure you weren’t running IE8b1 in IE7-mode?</blockquote></div> I was using it in the default mode. There was a drop-down list under the right "eye". The IE Team even has blog post describing <a href='http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/05/why-isn-t-ie8-passing-acid2.aspx' rel="nofollow">Why Isn't IE8 Passing Acid2?</a> Change wrote:
CoryC wrote:
IE 8 Beta 1 doesn’t pass Acid 2 or Acid 3 test. It received a 17/100 on the Acid 3 test. I thought it was supposed to pass Acid 2?

It does pass Acid2. I’ve just tested it in a virtal machine and the smiley face renders perfectly fine :) Are you sure you weren’t running IE8b1 in IE7-mode?

I was using it in the default mode. There was a drop-down list under the right “eye”.

The IE Team even has blog post describing blogs.msdn.com]' rel="nofollow">Why Isn’t IE8 Passing Acid2?

]]> By: Amaroq http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/comment-page-1/#comment-132618 Amaroq Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:03:58 +0000 http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/05/cybernotes-acid3-browser-results/#comment-132618 My Firefox on Ubuntu 7.10 gets 50. But a friend of mine who compiled his Firefox from source on Gentoo gets 53. My Firefox on Ubuntu 7.10 gets 50. But a friend of mine who compiled his Firefox from source on Gentoo gets 53.

]]>