<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CyberNotes: Best Lite Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:09:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Syahid A.</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-129936</link>
		<dc:creator>Syahid A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/15/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/#comment-129936</guid>
		<description>I need to check out WinAmp Lite. The available version is too sluggish for me. Another good alternative is the Quintessential Player. Lightweight and sounds great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to check out WinAmp Lite. The available version is too sluggish for me. Another good alternative is the Quintessential Player. Lightweight and sounds great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-129645</link>
		<dc:creator>How To Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/15/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/#comment-129645</guid>
		<description>pdfxchangeviewer is better than Adobe Reader Lite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pdfxchangeviewer is better than Adobe Reader Lite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-129635</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/15/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/#comment-129635</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129589&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;kvascola wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;QT and Real Alternative do not just allow you to watch .qt, .mov, .rm and others in a browser, but they add their codecs into system so you can watch videos in such formats in your media player (like WMP or MPC) without needing native apps.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That&#039;s a good point...can&#039;t believe I forgot to mention that.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129596&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pieter wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Winamp Lite is still not light enough for me. What ever happened to the time when Winamp was just a simple media player without media library, visualizations, browser and all that stuff? Winamp Lite is not as light as they want you to believe…

On a more positive note: their default skin has improved drastically over the years.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I think they&#039;ve eliminated the right mix of features to consider it a light version, but I do agree that they should offer something even smaller.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129614&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eddie wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Sometimes old versions of software can give you a lighter experience, although I wonder about security issues. This site has a good collection: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oldversion.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.oldversion.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That&#039;s a good point. A problem, in addition to security, could be compatibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129589" rel="nofollow">kvascola wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>QT and Real Alternative do not just allow you to watch .qt, .mov, .rm and others in a browser, but they add their codecs into system so you can watch videos in such formats in your media player (like WMP or MPC) without needing native apps.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That&#8217;s a good point&#8230;can&#8217;t believe I forgot to mention that.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129596" rel="nofollow">Pieter wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Winamp Lite is still not light enough for me. What ever happened to the time when Winamp was just a simple media player without media library, visualizations, browser and all that stuff? Winamp Lite is not as light as they want you to believe…</p>
<p>On a more positive note: their default skin has improved drastically over the years.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I think they&#8217;ve eliminated the right mix of features to consider it a light version, but I do agree that they should offer something even smaller.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129614" rel="nofollow">Eddie wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Sometimes old versions of software can give you a lighter experience, although I wonder about security issues. This site has a good collection: [<a href='http://www.oldversion.com/' rel='nofollow'>oldversion.com</a>]</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That&#8217;s a good point. A problem, in addition to security, could be compatibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-129614</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/15/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/#comment-129614</guid>
		<description>Sometimes old versions of software can give you a lighter experience, although I wonder about security issues. This site has a good collection: http://www.oldversion.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes old versions of software can give you a lighter experience, although I wonder about security issues. This site has a good collection: [<a href='http://www.oldversion.com/' rel='nofollow'>oldversion.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rafa</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-129613</link>
		<dc:creator>rafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/15/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/#comment-129613</guid>
		<description>very good useful post!! thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good useful post!! thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jawwad</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-129608</link>
		<dc:creator>jawwad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/15/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/#comment-129608</guid>
		<description>I think we are missing on skype lite version which is only 13MB as compared to full version which is 22MB. That is some saving! You can download it from softpedia. I will be trying it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we are missing on skype lite version which is only 13MB as compared to full version which is 22MB. That is some saving! You can download it from softpedia. I will be trying it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-129596</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/15/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/#comment-129596</guid>
		<description>Winamp Lite is still not light enough for me. What ever happened to the time when Winamp was just a simple media player without media library, visualizations, browser and all that stuff? Winamp Lite is not as light as they want you to believe...

On a more positive note: their default skin has improved drastically over the years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winamp Lite is still not light enough for me. What ever happened to the time when Winamp was just a simple media player without media library, visualizations, browser and all that stuff? Winamp Lite is not as light as they want you to believe&#8230;</p>
<p>On a more positive note: their default skin has improved drastically over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kvascola</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-129589</link>
		<dc:creator>kvascola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/15/cybernotes-best-lite-apps/#comment-129589</guid>
		<description>Old versions of Nero Lite and Micro (branch 7.x.x.x) are already activated after you installed it.
QT and Real Alternative do not just allow you to watch .qt, .mov, .rm and others in a browser, but they add their codecs into system so you can watch videos in such formats in your media player (like WMP or MPC) without needing native apps. Older versions of QT Alternative even have QuickTime Pro ability which allows you to save online content. That&#039;s why i prefer it and K-Lite Mega Codec Pack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old versions of Nero Lite and Micro (branch 7.x.x.x) are already activated after you installed it.<br />
QT and Real Alternative do not just allow you to watch .qt, .mov, .rm and others in a browser, but they add their codecs into system so you can watch videos in such formats in your media player (like WMP or MPC) without needing native apps. Older versions of QT Alternative even have QuickTime Pro ability which allows you to save online content. That&#8217;s why i prefer it and K-Lite Mega Codec Pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
