<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: CyberNotes: Browsing Files on Mac OS X vs. Vista</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-141131</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:05:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-141131</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-141094&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;anon wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe you haven’t heard of Vista’s preview pane. It displays previews of files directly using DWM APIs, no lag in opening another window or another app.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; That was mentioned in the article, but we&#039;ve found that it doesn&#039;t natively support as many filetypes as Finder.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-141094" rel="nofollow">anon wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Maybe you haven’t heard of Vista’s preview pane. It displays previews of files directly using DWM APIs, no lag in opening another window or another app.</p></blockquote></div><p>That was mentioned in the article, but we&#8217;ve found that it doesn&#8217;t natively support as many filetypes as Finder.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anon</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-141094</link> <dc:creator>anon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-141094</guid> <description>Maybe you haven&#039;t heard of Vista&#039;s preview pane. It displays previews of files directly using DWM APIs, no lag in opening another window or another app.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you haven&#8217;t heard of Vista&#8217;s preview pane. It displays previews of files directly using DWM APIs, no lag in opening another window or another app.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-141015</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:28:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-141015</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140995&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;M1ke wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Tabs. That’s all I want to see, tabs. Despite both companies copying tabs from other web browsers into their own neither have put 2 and 2 together and given their file browsers tabs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; No kidding. I think it&#039;s something that should definitely be optional, but having tabs when exploring files would be unbelievably handy in both operating systems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140995" rel="nofollow">M1ke wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Tabs. That’s all I want to see, tabs. Despite both companies copying tabs from other web browsers into their own neither have put 2 and 2 together and given their file browsers tabs.</p></blockquote></div><p>No kidding. I think it&#8217;s something that should definitely be optional, but having tabs when exploring files would be unbelievably handy in both operating systems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M1ke</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-140995</link> <dc:creator>M1ke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:07:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-140995</guid> <description>Tabs. That&#039;s all I want to see, tabs. Despite both companies copying tabs from other web browsers into their own neither have put 2 and 2 together and given their file browsers tabs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tabs. That&#8217;s all I want to see, tabs. Despite both companies copying tabs from other web browsers into their own neither have put 2 and 2 together and given their file browsers tabs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-140990</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:23:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-140990</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140983&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I know that there’s a program for Vista that can be used to force the OS to not remember any views, but I don’t know if you’re running Vista.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I&#039;m running XP, so no problems with views in Explorer, but the experience I described was the one I had with Finder in OSX 10.3 (I believe, maybe 10.2).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140983" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I know that there’s a program for Vista that can be used to force the OS to not remember any views, but I don’t know if you’re running Vista.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#8217;m running XP, so no problems with views in Explorer, but the experience I described was the one I had with Finder in OSX 10.3 (I believe, maybe 10.2).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-140983</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:03:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-140983</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140948&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140941&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Huh, it doesn’t have that problem for me. It always remembers the last view/size I used.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Exactly! It doesn’t return to the default view, but the last view/size you’ve used. Temporary changes become permanent..On networked drives it was even more annoying: it would revert to the last view/size of *anybody* who had accessed it (so I would see someone else’s preference..).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Ahh, I see what you&#039;re saying now. I could see how that would get annoying.I know that there&#039;s a program for Vista that can be used to force the OS to not remember any views, but I don&#039;t know if you&#039;re running Vista.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140948" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br /><blockquote><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140941" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Huh, it doesn’t have that problem for me. It always remembers the last view/size I used.</p></blockquote></div><p>Exactly! It doesn’t return to the default view, but the last view/size you’ve used. Temporary changes become permanent..</p><p>On networked drives it was even more annoying: it would revert to the last view/size of *anybody* who had accessed it (so I would see someone else’s preference..).</p></blockquote></div><p>Ahh, I see what you&#8217;re saying now. I could see how that would get annoying.</p><p>I know that there&#8217;s a program for Vista that can be used to force the OS to not remember any views, but I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re running Vista.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Change</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-140948</link> <dc:creator>Change</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:26:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-140948</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140941&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Huh, it doesn’t have that problem for me. It always remembers the last view/size I used.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Exactly! It doesn&#039;t return to the default view, but the last view/size you&#039;ve used. Temporary changes become permanent..On networked drives it was even more annoying: it would revert to the last view/size of *anybody* who had accessed it (so I would see someone else&#039;s preference..).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140941">Ryan wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Huh, it doesn’t have that problem for me. It always remembers the last view/size I used.</p></blockquote></div><p>Exactly! It doesn&#8217;t return to the default view, but the last view/size you&#8217;ve used. Temporary changes become permanent..</p><p>On networked drives it was even more annoying: it would revert to the last view/size of *anybody* who had accessed it (so I would see someone else&#8217;s preference..).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-140941</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:12:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-140941</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140901&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What I really disliked about Finder when I was using OS X, was that you couldn’t make it have a default view (for ALL folders, also networked, harddrives, dvd drives etc.) &amp; window size. It drove me crazy to see a different view/size everytime I had to open the Finder.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Huh, it doesn&#039;t have that problem for me. It always remembers the last view/size I used.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140903&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Famf wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Something I don’t like about Finder or Vista Explorer is the lack of an up button. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Actually in both Vista Windows Explorer and Finder you can use the breadcrumbs to navigate up a folder easily.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-140909&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nik wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;to go up one level is not too shabby alt+up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I don&#039;t think I ever knew that shortcut! I looked it up on a Mac and the corresponding keyboard shortcut is Command+Up. Nifty.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140901" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>What I really disliked about Finder when I was using OS X, was that you couldn’t make it have a default view (for ALL folders, also networked, harddrives, dvd drives etc.) &amp; window size. It drove me crazy to see a different view/size everytime I had to open the Finder.</p></blockquote></div><p>Huh, it doesn&#8217;t have that problem for me. It always remembers the last view/size I used.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140903" rel="nofollow">Famf wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Something I don’t like about Finder or Vista Explorer is the lack of an up button.</p></blockquote></div><p>Actually in both Vista Windows Explorer and Finder you can use the breadcrumbs to navigate up a folder easily.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-140909" rel="nofollow">nik wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>to go up one level is not too shabby alt+up.</p></blockquote></div><p>I don&#8217;t think I ever knew that shortcut! I looked it up on a Mac and the corresponding keyboard shortcut is Command+Up. Nifty.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nik</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-140909</link> <dc:creator>nik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-140909</guid> <description>Famf,For me I cannot use a mouse, it&#039;s way too slow. So the keyboard shortcut for explorer to go back one previously viewed folder is backspace. Easy eh?to go up one level is not too shabby alt+up.Good thing about keyboard short cut is that it allows for absolute confidence of what you are doing &quot;going one level up&quot;, &quot;going back to previous folder I was in&quot; by pressing those keys as long as you are in an explorer window. Where as with a mouse, you need to find the mouse, not too hard, find the button, not too hard, aim, not too hard either, and click , not too hard either. But there are these four steps that must require your eyes.alt+left arrow /right arrow is to go back/forward folders you&#039;ve viewed just now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Famf,</p><p>For me I cannot use a mouse, it&#8217;s way too slow. So the keyboard shortcut for explorer to go back one previously viewed folder is backspace. Easy eh?</p><p>to go up one level is not too shabby alt+up.</p><p>Good thing about keyboard short cut is that it allows for absolute confidence of what you are doing &#8220;going one level up&#8221;, &#8220;going back to previous folder I was in&#8221; by pressing those keys as long as you are in an explorer window. Where as with a mouse, you need to find the mouse, not too hard, find the button, not too hard, aim, not too hard either, and click , not too hard either. But there are these four steps that must require your eyes.</p><p>alt+left arrow /right arrow is to go back/forward folders you&#8217;ve viewed just now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Famf</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-browsing-files-on-mac-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-140903</link> <dc:creator>Famf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13692#comment-140903</guid> <description>Something I don&#039;t like about Finder or Vista Explorer is the lack of an up button.Although, I believe there is a way to get it back in Vista.  I don&#039;t use Vista very often though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I don&#8217;t like about Finder or Vista Explorer is the lack of an up button.</p><p>Although, I believe there is a way to get it back in Vista.  I don&#8217;t use Vista very often though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/319 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 15:44:35 -->
