<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: CyberNotes: Does Firefox Need Widgets?</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-does-firefox-need-widgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-does-firefox-need-widgets/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-does-firefox-need-widgets/#comment-89768</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/14/cybernotes-does-firefox-need-widgets/#comment-89768</guid> <description>I agree Chris, but a lot of people don&#039;t seem to think about the RAM usage when it comes to Firefox. In the past few weeks I have seen a lot of people say that they hope widgets is the next big thing for Firefox, but I didn&#039;t think it was necessary with the things already available.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Chris, but a lot of people don&#8217;t seem to think about the RAM usage when it comes to Firefox. In the past few weeks I have seen a lot of people say that they hope widgets is the next big thing for Firefox, but I didn&#8217;t think it was necessary with the things already available.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Rossini</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-does-firefox-need-widgets/#comment-89765</link> <dc:creator>Chris Rossini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:27:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/14/cybernotes-does-firefox-need-widgets/#comment-89765</guid> <description>With all of the different widget/gadget services available, I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s necessary for Firefox to dive into this area.As is, Firefox uses the most RAM on my computer...why pile more on?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all of the different widget/gadget services available, I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s necessary for Firefox to dive into this area.</p><p>As is, Firefox uses the most RAM on my computer&#8230;why pile more on?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: funTomas</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-does-firefox-need-widgets/#comment-89763</link> <dc:creator>funTomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:28:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/03/14/cybernotes-does-firefox-need-widgets/#comment-89763</guid> <description>Don&#039;t think so. Firefox&#039;s add-ons proved the right direction for tiny web-service utilities.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think so. Firefox&#8217;s add-ons proved the right direction for tiny web-service utilities.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 221/242 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 16:16:48 -->
