<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CyberNotes: Firefox 3 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jacques</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-140085</link>
		<dc:creator>jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-140085</guid>
		<description>@Change
Yes. You&#039;re right. It was me missing something, and i clearly see what you mean. But this feature is present in an other way in history. (finding a forgotten site name). (Op may keep up to 5000 entries). Though I don&#039;t use this very often. Almost never, in fact.
But for sure it&#039;s handy for those who need to retrieve smthng.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Change<br />
Yes. You&#8217;re right. It was me missing something, and i clearly see what you mean. But this feature is present in an other way in history. (finding a forgotten site name). (Op may keep up to 5000 entries). Though I don&#8217;t use this very often. Almost never, in fact.<br />
But for sure it&#8217;s handy for those who need to retrieve smthng.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waver17</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139948</link>
		<dc:creator>waver17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139948</guid>
		<description>ff3 only uses 2megs and under of ram for me because i use firefox ultimate optimizer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ff3 only uses 2megs and under of ram for me because i use firefox ultimate optimizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smithers</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139732</link>
		<dc:creator>Smithers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139732</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139390&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lilmoder wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Enhanced Address Bar (a.k.a. Awesome Bar) - Stolen from Opera
Simplified Bookmarking - Stolen from Opera
Smart Bookmarks (most visited) - Stolen from Opera (Top 10)
Full Page Zoom - Stolen from Opera

 :&#124;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
1. Developed at the same time. 
2. Where has Opera the single click bookmarking UI? Oh wait, there isn&#039;t.
3. Don&#039;t know
4. True, Opera had this first. Guess that makes it stolen then.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139391&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lilmoder wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Animated pngs - Opera has them already…&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Plain wrong. The APNG proposal comes from two Firefox developers.

Get your act together and stop being a fanboy. You are just hurting the image of Opera. Btw, I use Fx 3 as my primary browser, but I also think Opera 9.5 is just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139390" rel="nofollow">lilmoder wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Enhanced Address Bar (a.k.a. Awesome Bar) &#8211; Stolen from Opera<br />
Simplified Bookmarking &#8211; Stolen from Opera<br />
Smart Bookmarks (most visited) &#8211; Stolen from Opera (Top 10)<br />
Full Page Zoom &#8211; Stolen from Opera</p>
<p> <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>1. Developed at the same time.<br />
2. Where has Opera the single click bookmarking UI? Oh wait, there isn&#8217;t.<br />
3. Don&#8217;t know<br />
4. True, Opera had this first. Guess that makes it stolen then.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139391" rel="nofollow">lilmoder wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Animated pngs &#8211; Opera has them already…</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Plain wrong. The APNG proposal comes from two Firefox developers.</p>
<p>Get your act together and stop being a fanboy. You are just hurting the image of Opera. Btw, I use Fx 3 as my primary browser, but I also think Opera 9.5 is just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffxx3</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139683</link>
		<dc:creator>ffxx3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139683</guid>
		<description>jacques wrote: [quote]Why would you want to put “cyb news”[/quote]
I bookmark many cybernetnews news, and with Firefox3 i can find right cybernet news easy, i can type like &quot;cybernetnews acid test&quot;, and i more likely see all right cybernetnews bookmarks i have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jacques wrote: [quote]Why would you want to put “cyb news”[/quote]<br />
I bookmark many cybernetnews news, and with Firefox3 i can find right cybernet news easy, i can type like &#8220;cybernetnews acid test&#8221;, and i more likely see all right cybernetnews bookmarks i have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139541</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139541</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139538&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jacques wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve just entered “cyb” in Op adr.Bar, and a plenty of Cybernet entries and levels were proposed, with others. Why would you want to put “cyb news”, Ryan?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I&#039;m not Ryan but you probably meant to respond to me. In this case, you remember that the site was called &quot;cybernetnews&quot;. Imagine that you visited this site as a new user, and a few days later you think &quot;hmm, what was that site with &#039;news&#039; in it again?&quot; and you type &quot;news&quot;. If you visit a lot of news sites, you&#039;ll likely get tons of results. So you remember &quot;ah yeah, it had something with &#039;cyb&#039; in there too&quot;, so you type &#039;news cyb&#039;.

You get the exact result in Fx3, but in Opera you&#039;re forced to search Google. This is more useful with sites without such a distinctive name as Cybernetnews of course, that was a very simple example. What&#039;s important is that Fx&#039;s interpretation of the &quot;query&quot; in the location bar is smarter, thus returning better/more results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139538" rel="nofollow">jacques wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I’ve just entered “cyb” in Op adr.Bar, and a plenty of Cybernet entries and levels were proposed, with others. Why would you want to put “cyb news”, Ryan?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;m not Ryan but you probably meant to respond to me. In this case, you remember that the site was called &#8220;cybernetnews&#8221;. Imagine that you visited this site as a new user, and a few days later you think &#8220;hmm, what was that site with &#8216;news&#8217; in it again?&#8221; and you type &#8220;news&#8221;. If you visit a lot of news sites, you&#8217;ll likely get tons of results. So you remember &#8220;ah yeah, it had something with &#8216;cyb&#8217; in there too&#8221;, so you type &#8216;news cyb&#8217;.</p>
<p>You get the exact result in Fx3, but in Opera you&#8217;re forced to search Google. This is more useful with sites without such a distinctive name as Cybernetnews of course, that was a very simple example. What&#8217;s important is that Fx&#8217;s interpretation of the &#8220;query&#8221; in the location bar is smarter, thus returning better/more results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacques</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139538</link>
		<dc:creator>jacques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just entered &quot;cyb&quot; in Op adr.Bar, and a plenty of Cybernet entries and levels were proposed, with others. Why would you want to put &quot;cyb news&quot;, Ryan? I must have missed something.
FFox is the great browser for average surfing users. No doubt.
It wouldn&#039;t have 14 millions downloads if it was not.
But, question of taste and experience in my professional daily use, Opera just fits my needs, and I admit the buit-in e-mail client is one of these important points, along with instantaneous loading, starting dialog and overall never a trouble.
But FFox is great in its aiming, no doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just entered &#8220;cyb&#8221; in Op adr.Bar, and a plenty of Cybernet entries and levels were proposed, with others. Why would you want to put &#8220;cyb news&#8221;, Ryan? I must have missed something.<br />
FFox is the great browser for average surfing users. No doubt.<br />
It wouldn&#8217;t have 14 millions downloads if it was not.<br />
But, question of taste and experience in my professional daily use, Opera just fits my needs, and I admit the buit-in e-mail client is one of these important points, along with instantaneous loading, starting dialog and overall never a trouble.<br />
But FFox is great in its aiming, no doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139525</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139525</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139475&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;a.k.a Awesomely Stupid Bar. What is the point showing the “name” of the bar and the address? You never need that and it looks like a mess. When you are typing an address you know damn well what site it is referring to even if those names arent the same. Also it does not put the plain address top of the list. I mean if I write “cybern” to the address bar the list is as follows?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://cybernetnews.com/flock-20-beta-released-based-on-firefox-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cybernetnews.com/2008/0.....firefox-3/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://cybernetnews.com/flock-20-beta-released-based-on-firefox-3/feed&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cybernetnews.com/2008/0.....fox-3/feed&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://cybernetnews.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cybernetnews.com/&lt;/a&gt;

Even IE can always put that &lt;a href=&quot;http://cybernetnews.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cybernetnews.com/&lt;/a&gt; to the top of the list because that is the most used one no matter what is the last visited.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
It will learn what pages you visit the most, and put those toward the top. So if you visit our homepage more then it will start placing that as the first result. It also looks at whether a particular page is bookmarked and give more weight to those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139475" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>a.k.a Awesomely Stupid Bar. What is the point showing the “name” of the bar and the address? You never need that and it looks like a mess. When you are typing an address you know damn well what site it is referring to even if those names arent the same. Also it does not put the plain address top of the list. I mean if I write “cybern” to the address bar the list is as follows?</p>
<p>[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/flock-20-beta-released-based-on-firefox-3/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]<br />
[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/flock-20-beta-released-based-on-firefox-3/feed' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]<br />
[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]</p>
<p>Even IE can always put that [<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>] to the top of the list because that is the most used one no matter what is the last visited.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>It will learn what pages you visit the most, and put those toward the top. So if you visit our homepage more then it will start placing that as the first result. It also looks at whether a particular page is bookmarked and give more weight to those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139484</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139484</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139475&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What is the point showing the “name” of the bar and the address?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Do you mean the bookmark name? I generally put a lot more info in the bookmark name (and tags) than the URL contains. By also showing and searching for the name, it can return a lot more results that might apply to what you&#039;re looking for. I find that these days I hardly type in the address anymore, just the name or type of thing I am looking for. I love that option.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-139475&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Even IE can always put that &lt;a href=&quot;http://cybernetnews.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://cybernetnews.com/&lt;/a&gt; to the top of the list because that is the most used one no matter what is the last visited.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Yeah, true, that annoys me too. It should put more emphasis on the top level/directories (and not pages).

By the way - for you Opera users, in Opera I wouldn&#039;t be able to search for &quot;cyb news&quot; and get a result. In Firefox I will, so I think Firefox didn&#039;t just copy, but also improved and thus innovated slightly. You should applaud Firefox for taking it mainstream. Besides, I&#039;d see this as a huge compliment towards Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139475" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>What is the point showing the “name” of the bar and the address?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Do you mean the bookmark name? I generally put a lot more info in the bookmark name (and tags) than the URL contains. By also showing and searching for the name, it can return a lot more results that might apply to what you&#8217;re looking for. I find that these days I hardly type in the address anymore, just the name or type of thing I am looking for. I love that option.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-139475" rel="nofollow">Anonymous wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Even IE can always put that [<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>] to the top of the list because that is the most used one no matter what is the last visited.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yeah, true, that annoys me too. It should put more emphasis on the top level/directories (and not pages).</p>
<p>By the way &#8211; for you Opera users, in Opera I wouldn&#8217;t be able to search for &#8220;cyb news&#8221; and get a result. In Firefox I will, so I think Firefox didn&#8217;t just copy, but also improved and thus innovated slightly. You should applaud Firefox for taking it mainstream. Besides, I&#8217;d see this as a huge compliment towards Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139479</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139479</guid>
		<description>Opera users always seem annyoed that Firefox takes there ideas, but i think as &quot;The Times&quot; said, &quot;Firefox made most of those features mainstream as the &quot;average&quot; user only ever see IE and thats it&quot;. 

I see it this way, If firefox took more of the sharemarket from Microsoft its good for Opera and other web browsers. Take parts of europe Firefox owns 28% of market already</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera users always seem annyoed that Firefox takes there ideas, but i think as &#8220;The Times&#8221; said, &#8220;Firefox made most of those features mainstream as the &#8220;average&#8221; user only ever see IE and thats it&#8221;. </p>
<p>I see it this way, If firefox took more of the sharemarket from Microsoft its good for Opera and other web browsers. Take parts of europe Firefox owns 28% of market already</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-firefox-3-review/comment-page-1/#comment-139475</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=13146#comment-139475</guid>
		<description>Enhanced Address Bar (a.k.a. Awesome Bar)?

a.k.a Awesomely Stupid Bar. What is the point showing the &quot;name&quot; of the bar and the address? You never need that and it looks like a mess. When you are typing an address you know damn well what site it is referring to even if those names arent the same. Also it does not put the plain address top of the list. I mean if I write &quot;cybern&quot; to the address bar the list is as follows?

http://cybernetnews.com/flock-20-beta-released-based-on-firefox-3/
http://cybernetnews.com/flock-20-beta-released-based-on-firefox-3/feed
http://cybernetnews.com/

Even IE can always put that http://cybernetnews.com/ to the top of the list because that is the most used one no matter what is the last visited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enhanced Address Bar (a.k.a. Awesome Bar)?</p>
<p>a.k.a Awesomely Stupid Bar. What is the point showing the &#8220;name&#8221; of the bar and the address? You never need that and it looks like a mess. When you are typing an address you know damn well what site it is referring to even if those names arent the same. Also it does not put the plain address top of the list. I mean if I write &#8220;cybern&#8221; to the address bar the list is as follows?</p>
<p>[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/flock-20-beta-released-based-on-firefox-3/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]<br />
[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/flock-20-beta-released-based-on-firefox-3/feed' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]<br />
[<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]</p>
<p>Even IE can always put that [<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>] to the top of the list because that is the most used one no matter what is the last visited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
