<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CyberNotes: HTML Signatures in Apple Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-html-signatures-in-apple-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-html-signatures-in-apple-mail/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-html-signatures-in-apple-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-136898</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12241#comment-136898</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-136860&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;When creating a signature in HTML it’s important to realize that while it may look good in your email client, it may not in others (especially Outlook 2007 with its picky engine). If you’d like to know for each client (incl. web clients) what is supported and what is not, you could check this article:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/archives/2007/04/a_guide_to_css_support_in_emai_2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.campaignmonitor.com.....mai_2.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That&#039;s a good point. I&#039;ve always kept them pretty simple so I&#039;ve never had any problems really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-136860" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>When creating a signature in HTML it’s important to realize that while it may look good in your email client, it may not in others (especially Outlook 2007 with its picky engine). If you’d like to know for each client (incl. web clients) what is supported and what is not, you could check this article:<br />
[<a href='http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/archives/2007/04/a_guide_to_css_support_in_emai_2.html' rel='nofollow'>campaignmonitor.com</a>]</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That&#8217;s a good point. I&#8217;ve always kept them pretty simple so I&#8217;ve never had any problems really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-html-signatures-in-apple-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-136860</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12241#comment-136860</guid>
		<description>When creating a signature in HTML it&#039;s important to realize that while it may look good in your email client, it may not in others (especially Outlook 2007 with its picky engine). If you&#039;d like to know for each client (incl. web clients) what is supported and what is not, you could check this article:
http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/archives/2007/04/a_guide_to_css_support_in_emai_2.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When creating a signature in HTML it&#8217;s important to realize that while it may look good in your email client, it may not in others (especially Outlook 2007 with its picky engine). If you&#8217;d like to know for each client (incl. web clients) what is supported and what is not, you could check this article:<br />
[<a href='http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/archives/2007/04/a_guide_to_css_support_in_emai_2.html' rel='nofollow'>campaignmonitor.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-html-signatures-in-apple-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-136839</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=12241#comment-136839</guid>
		<description>&quot;t’s kind of always boggled my mind as to why these email applications don’t support HTML signatures out-of-the-box. &quot;

My thoughts exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;t’s kind of always boggled my mind as to why these email applications don’t support HTML signatures out-of-the-box. &#8221;</p>
<p>My thoughts exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
