Where to Find Answers How to Get Free Shipping at Amazon Pie Menu Extension for Firefox A Minimalist Firefox Create a Shortcut to Launch Multiple Programs
Collapsed This Week Collapsed CyberNotes
Collapsed Last Week

CyberNotes
Microsoft/Mac Monday


In the past we’ve written about Windows Photo Gallery and what a great job Microsoft has done with it. Not only is it a great way to manage photos, but it is also helpful for “fixing” (cropping, removing red-eye, etc.) them as well. You can even use it to upload photos to popular photo-sharing site Flickr (Windows Live Photo Gallery only), now how convenient is that? To continue our series on comparing features from Mac computers with those you’d find if you’re using Windows Vista, we’ll be comparing Apple’s iPhoto with Windows Photo Gallery.

About Windows Photo Gallery

As you might expect, Windows Photo Gallery is a feature that is included with all versions of Windows Vista. There’s also Windows Live Photo Gallery which is a downloadable version available to those using Windows XP and Vista (it has more features than Windows Photo Gallery). Overall it’s a photo management tool but they’ve incorporated features like the option to edit, tag, and add captions.

Navigating Windows Photo Gallery is simple and most of it is done either at the top or in the left-side navigation bar. There are also a few controls at the bottom for moving along to the next photo or rotating a picture. Right from the gallery is the option to print your photos using the Print Wizard or ordering copies of the photo online. Users can create and view slide shows of their photos.

windows photo gallery.PNG

About iPhoto

iPhoto is a product of Apple and is part of the iLife suite of applications that all new Mac owners receive. iPhoto is supposed to help you organize, edit, print and share your photos. Like Windows Photo Gallery, they offer basic image editing tools like the option to remove red-eyes or crop and resize photos. Their organization system involves placing all photos into groups which they call “Events.”

Other Apple applications are incorporated into iPhoto like the option to import music from iTunes to incorporate into dynamic slideshows. You can edit those slideshows in iMovie or you can also burn them to DVD using iDVD right from iPhoto.

iPhoto.png

Disadvantages of using Windows Photo Gallery

One of the nice features about iPhoto is that there’s an option to create a book, calendar, or card, right from the application. This is something that Windows Photo Gallery does not offer, although they do offer the option to send your pictures to a company online for printing which may offer similar features. Below you’ll see an image of what you’d see if you were to make a book in iPhoto. You can choose various themes, background colors, a layout, and more. Once you’re done, you can buy the book and have it professionally printed.

iPhoto-1.png

Disadvantages of using iPhoto

Perhaps the complaints we list today with iPhoto are because we are used to the ways of “Windows” , but in general we like control over how things are organized and iPhoto somewhat takes away that privilege. iPhoto wants to manage all of your photo files (which is like iTunes – it wants to manage all of your music). This is probably fine for most people, but for those of us who like to have control over how things are organized (Power Users), this can prove to be frustrating, especially if you like using a folder/sub-folder structure. We’ll get into that a little later.

If you want to work with your photos, you have to import the images (which is the only way you can get them into iPhoto). iPhoto ends up copying all of the photos into it’s own directory which means that this method takes up more of your memory. I should mention that there is an option in the preferences under the “advanced” tab where you can uncheck “copy items to the iPhoto library” so that when you import photos it doesn’t actually copy the file into the iPhoto library. Instead it will show you a shortcut, but the only problem is if you move the location of the original photo then the shortcut is not going to work and in turn, the photos will not show up in iPhoto when you want to do something with them.

Another “disadvantage” as we see it is for those who have their own system for organizing photos. Using iPhoto requires getting used to the “Mac” way of doing things which is essentially letting the application take control over how things are organized so that you don’t have to worry about it. iPhoto ends up organizing photos by the year that they were taken. You also have no control over file names. If you import images directly from your camera, it will keep the same file names that your camera gave the photos which is usually just a bunch of letters and numbers. There is a batch change feature which allows you to change the name, and you can append a number to it, but it won’t change the actual file name. If you happen to have your pictures organized into folders and sub-folders, iPhoto will ignore any folder structure that you have and only uses the parent folder of where the images are located as the event name.

Yet another downside is that if you go to edit a photo, it doesn’t actually touch the original. In the iPhoto library is a “modified” folder where all of your modified photos are stored. It’s good in the sense that you can always go back, but when we edit photos, we like the original to be changed because that’s likely to be the one you’d want to access more frequently. Windows Photo Gallery always modifies the original in the location where it’s at which is convenient, and then it saves a copy of the original in its own folder which makes more sense.

Wrapping it up

After comparing iPhoto to Windows Photo Gallery, for our purposes Windows Photo Gallery is the winner because it provides the user with more control over the organization of the photos and is great for navigational purposes because your folder structure is available in the left side-bar.

So far we’ve taken a look at the following Leopard vs. Vista Comparisons:

RSS Icon This is just one of the hundreds of CyberNotes we have done. You can find more of them by visiting our CyberNotes category, or by subscribing to our CyberNotes feed. We also have a full feed available if you want to receive all of our articles in your reader!

Tags: CyberNotes, Software, Windows, , , , ,

Previous ArticleNext Article
 

Related Posts:


25 Unread Comment Tracking CyberMark This Article
RSS Icon
25

  1. Avatar

    Hmmmm. Bet you don’t see this in a PC vs Mac commercial.

  2. Avatar

    Great post. I have the same issues with iPhoto. I thought iPhoto would be better than what it is considering what I’ve heard from different people. I prefer to have more control myself.

  3. Avatar

    I’m glad Windows Photo Gallery is finally improving. However, I’m still using iLife ‘06, so I really need to upgrade to see the new version of iPhoto.

  4. Avatar

    Windows Photo Gallery and support for tags in general was one of the main attractions in Windows Vista for me.

    I had previously used a program called iTag to add tags and captions to my photos but it was really slow and clumsy to use. With Photo Gallery tagging is easy and fast. I have my photos tagged hierarchically in categories such as Places, People, Pets etc. I still keep the photos in monthly folders as well but it’s great to be able to search for example all the top rated photos taken last summer of my dog in the summer cottage.

  5. Avatar
    Mharr wrote:
    Hmmmm. Bet you don’t see this in a PC vs Mac commercial.

    Definitely not! Or if they did they would push the fact that it manages everything for you, but leave out how you have little control over how your files are stored.

    Sleepy wrote:
    Great post. I have the same issues with iPhoto. I thought iPhoto would be better than what it is considering what I’ve heard from different people. I prefer to have more control myself.

    I thought it was going to be an incredible application from what I had heard, but I was extremely disappointed with it.

    Spencer wrote:
    I’m glad Windows Photo Gallery is finally improving. However, I’m still using iLife ‘06, so I really need to upgrade to see the new version of iPhoto.

    I wonder what has changed since the 2006 version?

    Mris wrote:
    Windows Photo Gallery and support for tags in general was one of the main attractions in Windows Vista for me.

    I never got into using tagging in Vista, but it was nice that it was always there if I wanted it. Their tagging system was setup very well within Windows Photo Gallery.

  6. Avatar

    I wanted to open a video file with Windows Photo Gallery. I chose Open-with from the right click menu of a video file and then I chose Windows Photo Gallery program. It crashed Windows Photo Gallery and no video files worked in it since.

    So NEVER right-click on a video file and choose Photo Gallery.

    If you want to play videos in Photo Gallery, then open it first and select a video from inside Photo Gallery.

    I moved my important files to a different folder, deleted my Vista user and made a new one to use Photo Gallery for playing videos again.

  7. Avatar

    I like Microsoft products – but there is a problem with Windows Photo Gallery from Windows – if you share the photos online – e.g., Windows Live Spaces – the users cannot download full size photos.

    Photos published online using iPhoto can be downloaded in full size. Now one must pay $100 a year for the .mac account. But it seems worth it. Also, right during the upload, one can send out an announcement.

    An alternative is to share the photos on the free 5gb Windows Sky Drive – but now things are getting kludgey.

  8. Avatar
    jc wrote:
    I like Microsoft products – but there is a problem with Windows Photo Gallery from Windows – if you share the photos online – e.g., Windows Live Spaces – the users cannot download full size photos.

    Photos published online using iPhoto can be downloaded in full size. Now one must pay $100 a year for the .mac account. But it seems worth it. Also, right during the upload, one can send out an announcement.

    An alternative is to share the photos on the free 5gb Windows Sky Drive – but now things are getting kludgey.

    Use the Flickr service. It’s integrated into Windows Live Photo Gallery and it only costs $25 per year. You can then let users download full size images.

  9. Avatar

    I’m running Win XP and Vista. But, I’ve liked the way some friend”s IPhotoslide shows look when the slide opens from one corner and pans to full size. It gives the feel of a movie. I’m looking for a program for XP/Vista which will do the same thing. Anybody know one. As far a photo managing and editing, I’ve been very pleased with
    ACDSee Photo Manager which seems to do it all. Tom

  10. Avatar

    Googled and checked out several programs. I settled on Photo Story 3 for Windows and have completed my first production. It turned out great. I love it so far. Easy to use. It says you have to have a valid Win XP program but I downloaded it to Vista, no problem.

  11. Avatar

    I love the photo tagging (and other tagging features of vista). It’s a shame the mac people think Leopard is so perfect. I actually DITCHED my macbook and went to Vista after SP1 came out. I’m much more productive. I love how I can search for all my photos instantly using tags, keywords, etc. I hated how iPhoto organized photos in the directories (modified, originals, and always by date, wtf!). In Vista, it’s the same layout as in the Pictures folder so I can use either program to get to the pics.

    I’ve used Leopard for a year and use macs every day at work, but I much prefer Vista! I’m a Mac-To-Vista converter and very happy. MS really needs to advertise!!

  12. Avatar

    iPhoto is great for novices. Which are the majority of Mac users…

    The other disadvantage with iPhoto is that I use Win and Macs at home and there is no easy way for Win users to see iPhoto albums…

    I agree, iPhoto needs to get the following features:
    a) Ability to pull all your pictures in to ONE folder like iTunes.

    b) Save modified files with originals in the same folder.

    c) A better navigation panel and the ability to browse pictures in a folder without importing them.

    d) Export data to be readable by Win photo management apps.

    e) Have an “expert” mode for power users. Even iPhone is annoying about the structure of albums.

    I am looking at consumer products from Adobe like Adobe Photoshop Elements

    Man, using anything on Vista is like pulling your healthy teeth with a pair of pliers out without anesthesia. ALL versions of Vista are EVIL…:evil:

    Don’t get me wrong, I love Win XP SP2. It is amongst the best OS’s that I have used…

  13. Avatar

    Hi, I am a Professional Webdeveloper and Graphics Designer also a Iphoto “power user” i am struggling to understand your “”Disadvantages of using iPhoto”"

    I copy my files from my camera in RAW format, it saves them into iPhoto organised by the shooting date an “Event”. I can then Manipulate the Events. iPhoto organises my photos in the iPhoto folder location, that is Accessible through Finder, which is then organised in the same Events as i have specified. i can choose META (similar to id3 tags). to how the photo is recognised in OSX finder and on XP/VISTA Computers.

    When i edit a photo i use the Edit photo button that opens Photoshop CS3, i can edit and save my photo i can then save my image where i like, and use iPhoto hold my Master images (like an SVN). a upside is that it Keeps my Original image, so if i accidently save my image i still have my Master File.

    I can also Export to FTP/HTTP/Facebook/ Create web galleries from a click, and also export to Quicktime slideshows, all through ONE accessible menu named “EXPORT”.

    iPhoto is easy to use, much better than Aperture and Adobe Lightroom, is SIMPLE, any powerfull things i need to do i use Adobe Software.

    I could understand if people “put all their eggs in one basket” and try to use iPhoto as their only Photo editor, cause that is just idiotic.

  14. Avatar

    I would expect “Power” users to know the difference between memory and storage, but apparently that’s asking too much. Most Mac people are sophisticated and experienced computer users. Ever hear of Seymour Cray? The fact that you have to muck about in the innards of the OS to get your work done does not make you a power user.

    Also, a comparative article such as this should be written by someone with an easy familiarity with both OSes. It’s clear that the author does not have such a familiarity with the Mac OS X, which has always given the user more control (it is, after all, BSD UNIX with nEXT middleware and an advanced Mac OS gui.) The fact that you are more familiar with Vista than Leopard does not make for an objective comparative model.

    I run Leopard, Windows Vista and XP, and Ubuntu Linux on a MacBook Pro. I’m intimately familiar with all four OSes. My preference is for Mac OS X Leopard. If I want power tools for cataloging, batch processing, or simply editing photo files, I go with Adobe, preferably for Mac. But hey, keep preaching to your choir. There’s nothing more comforting than having one’s cognitive dissonance reinforced by someone else’s willful ignorance.

  15. Avatar
    Anonymous wrote:
    A comparative article such as this should be written by someone with an easy familiarity with both OSes. It’s clear that the author does not have such a familiarity with the Mac OS X, which has always given the user more control (it is, after all, BSD UNIX with nEXT middleware and an advanced Mac OS gui.) The fact that you are more familiar with Vista than Leopard does not make for an objective comparative model.

    Dude, this is our own personal comparison. We wrote about our observations and opinions of the two software applications. If you disagree with us feel free to write your own review/comparison.

    P.S. We do use Mac, Vista, XP, Ubuntu, and Fedora on a regular basis. We’re well versed in multiple operating systems despite your assumptions.

  16. Avatar

    I think thAT WINDOWS PHOTO GALLERY IS AN EXITING EXPERIENCE. i HAVE IT IN ALL THREE COMPUTERS IN MY HOUSE. :D :lol: :mrgreen: :) 8) :idea: :P :P

  17. Avatar

    Great review, and I1m totaly AGREE with it.
    I write this comment on a black Apple Macbook, and my experience is: iPhoto is a peace of s..t! :(

  18. Avatar

    Guys are you with your minds ? iPhoto ‘09 is the best photo gallery ever ! It can sort pictures by faces, you can attach location to your picture, it makes your folders into events… Are you organising your photos right ? Mine are organised into folders and i don’t have any trouble at all ! CN power users (rofl) i thing someone paid you to type this review ;] If someone thing im Apple fanboy you are wrong I am Windows user from 10 years, Linux user from 1-2 years and Leopard user from one and a half month .. and my personal experiance with those OS’s says : Windows for games, Linux for reliability and Leopard for all your other work/entertainment + reliability !

  19. Avatar

    Hmm.. cool site if someone like me says the truth his post gets deleted, nice ;]

  20. Avatar
    Anonymous wrote:
    Guys are you with your minds ? iPhoto ‘09 is the best photo gallery ever ! It can sort pictures by faces, you can attach location to your picture, it makes your folders into events…

    iPhoto ‘09 is definitely better than previous versions. I’ve actually started to use it because of the faces and places features they’ve added, along with the Flickr uploading.

    Anonymous wrote:
    Hmm.. cool site if someone like me says the truth his post gets deleted, nice ;]

    I don’t know why your comment didn’t show up when you looked, but it definitely wasn’t deleted.

  21. Avatar

    No disadvantages to photo gallery???????? What a surprise!

  22. Endless nameless Quote this Comment Report this Comment
    Avatar

    Yeah I’ve recently ditched my mac to get this Windows box and I gave Windows Live Photo Gallery a whirl.

    Not that impressed.

    iPhoto is much more intuitive and user friendly. So what if it ‘takes control’ of my photos. It’s supposed to. It’s an effing photo management program! Personally only being able to go two sub directories deep is not a big problem for me.

    Also although the photo editing tools on Microsoft effort leave much to be desired (hello no where’s the eetouching brush). Though I must admit I like the auto fix feature.

    For casual users who just want to edit and/or funkify their photos then iPhoto wins HANDS DOWN..

  23. Avatar

    I am a novice. I have Vista and my daughter (who is scanning and tagging 7,000 photos) has MAC. Can someone tell me which one (Photo Gallery or IPhoto 09 is best for SORTING all of these photos after they are tagged? I am not going to do sharing on the web. Will make various DVD/CD’s for the family (like family resemblences between generations) or daughters ice skating and granddaughters ice skating), etc. Thanks.

  24. Avatar

    Pamela use Picasa, it is easy to do that, there are plenty of choices to manage albums in PC

:mrgreen: :| :twisted: 8O :) :? 8) :evil: :D :oops: :P :roll: ;) :cry: :o :lol: :x :(
↓ Expand Text Area  or  Decrease Text Area ↑

 Find out how to track new comments!