These days, it can be difficult to manually keep track of contact information for family, friends, and co-workers. Not only is there usually a phone number to remember, but often times there are multiple phone numbers, email addresses, fax numbers, pager numbers, etc. One way to solve the problem of trying to keep up with all of your contact’s information is to use an application for managing them. Luckily for both Vista and Leopard users, there’s a solution built right-in to the operating system. If you’re using Vista it’s called Windows Contacts and if you’re using Leopard it’s simply called Address Book. Today we’ll be comparing the features of both and covering some of the best features that each offers.
Finding Windows Contacts and Address Book
While this may be very basic, if you can’t locate Windows Contacts or Address Book on a Mac, they will be of no use to you! So for those who aren’t quite sure where to look…
To find Windows Contacts
Press Start key and start typing “Windows Contacts” — it comes with Vista so you already have it on your computer. This is what you’ll be looking for:

To find Address Book (Mac)
Address Book comes with Leopard and should already be located on your Dock. Just look for this icon:

Highlights of each…
One of the nicest parts of both Windows Contacts and Address Book is that they come with the operating system. It’s not that either is an extravagant way to manage contacts – it’s simple and that’s what is great about it. Both options allow you to include all of the important details you would need for your various contacts including email addresses, telephone numbers, a photo, extra notes, etc.
Using Windows Contacts
For those of you using Windows Contacts, your navigation bar is at the top of Windows Explorer. From there you can add new contacts, create a new contact group, and import or export your contacts. If you decide to export your contacts, you can select among CSV or vCard formats.
You can either have a list with all of your contacts, or you can divide them into groups by creating “Contact Groups.” Examples of Contact Groups you’d have include family, friends, and co-workers. Using the groups really helps to keep everything organized and also makes it easier if you need to email all of the members of one group and you’re using Outlook.
Another aspect that is nice is for when you’re entering all of the information for your contacts. Microsoft chose a tabbed interface which divides the information into the following categories:
- Name and Email
- Home
- Work
- Family
- Notes
- ID’s
It’s nice to have the information broken down for two reasons. First, it makes entering the information a little more organized. Secondly, it makes finding the information when you need it effortless. Take a look at the tabbed interface that I’m talking about:
For the basics, Windows Contacts gets the job done in a very simple way.
Using Address Book
After using Windows Contacts, using Address Book on a Mac was pretty different because there’s more to it and the interface is completely different. It’s integrated with Mail, iChat, and other apps which means accessing your contact’s information from those apps is simple. Here’s an example of this integration. I created a contact group labeled “Family” and it has all of my family members listed. When I went to Mail to send a message, all I had to type was the group name which was “Family” into the “to” field and it pulled in all of their email addresses.

The Address Book is divided into 3 panes (you can also switch to a “Card Only” view), and to add a contact, you just click the “plus” sign in the 2nd pane. In the 3rd pane you’ll see all of the information. There are no tabs, you just scroll to come across all of the information. Like Windows Contacts, you can add a picture and if you have any extra information you’d like to add, there’s a “notes” section.
Extra features that Address Book offers that I really like include the option to print a “Pocket-sized” version of your contacts list as well as the option to create a “Smart Group” which will update itself “if any contact fits the same search criteria you set for a Smart Group.
Wrapping it up…
Overall I’d say Apple did a better job with Address Book than Microsoft did with Windows Contacts, but both get the job done of providing a simple way for people to keep track of their contacts.
So far we’ve taken a look at the following Leopard vs. Vista comparisons:



One of the things I love about OS X is the mobile phone syncing capabilities. I was able to sync my Address Book with my old Nokia 7610 smart phone without needing to install software. I wouldn’t be able to sync it otherwise in OS X since Nokia doesn’t have a Mac version of their software. It even includes the pictures that I had associated with each contact. I do have Windows XP that I run through Fusion but it’s nice not having to open it to do that.
Sync is always the issue here – does either allow me to keep it synced with Gmail or Yahoo Mail? Does either allow me to import contacts from an LDAP server? Will the address book work with any mail client on the system or just the native one?
For the Mac Address Book you can sync it with Yahoo contacts, and you can import from an LDAP server. You can also sync with a .Mac or Exchange account.
Annoying that Windows Contacts isn’t similar – might actually make it useful.
I use Windows XP and just recently purchased a crappy piece of software from Franklin/Covey called Address/Phone v2. I bought it to synch with Outlook Contacts because Outlook Contacts is limited in ways that I want to use my Contacts, i.e., print labels, etc.
Seeing your comparison between AddressBook and Windows Contacts with the directions you gave about accessing the Windows Contacts causes me to write to you…like, what are you talking about…when I press START and type Windows Contacts…nothing but a big boom, with a dialog box comes up saying that Windows can’t find that application.
Not only that I can’t find any application in the windows directory that looks like Windows Contacts. I tried using the RUN box and…same thing, nada, no such animal. Why? Am I not doing something right? My Windows is Ver 5 build 2600.xpsp_gdr.080814-1236.
So does this not contain Windows Contacts. I have struggled with the d**n Outlook Contacts versus the email list in Outlook…some entries appear one place but not the other and no explanation of why this is so makes any sense or enables me to use them interchangeably.
I’d love a functional Contacts different from the Outlook one…is there one built into Windows XP?????
not only “windows contacts” sucks even outlook is worse then. ok some hard introduction. look.. windows comes with some set of features like mail, calculator, paint etc. but i can say that; none of them do it’s job that you should expect. very basic features they provide.
imho “paid” application Ms Outlook doesn’t handle poor expectations. so what?
- in Ms Outlook you cannot enter more than one “mobile number” for a contact. (here in my country people has at-least two mobile numbers because one for business, another personal)
+ in free to download application for ubuntu named “kontact” you can add many numbers to one person. i.e. two mobile phones and three business phones.
- in Ms Outlook there is no ability to add more than one business address for a contact. (my business buddies some foreign trade people lives around some countries and usually have more than two business addresses. on the other hand our customers have multiple branches nation wide and receive goods in each branch. so basically I wanna know my customer’s branches all around.
+ in kontact (kde application) you can add many addresses to anyone.
- in misrosoft outlook there is only one field fo “im”. there is no way to add more than instant messaging account to anyone.
+ in kontact you can add and specify more than one skype, yahoo, google talk, aim, etc. accounts to everyone. i.e. my friends at least have two skype accounts as personal and business.
imho Kontact is even better than Evolution. Also Evolution has same limitations of Ms Outlook.
i highly recoommend to use soon to be released windows version of Kontact.
Not sure if you need a business tool or a consumer-oriented PIM application. Kontact is not a business tool. Evolution and Outlook are. They don’t care about Yahoo! and GTalk names. Microsoft cares about WLM and Lync (and perhaps now Skype) names. They have one field so you can put the Windows ID in there and get Presence information for those contacts.
Smart people limit the amount of networks they use, because communication is better when you are on largely the same networks as everyone else.
Only a dumb person would need fields for GTalk, Y!IM, AIM, Skype, WLM, etc.
Try video conferencing across IM networks and see how far you get.
This is why businesses tend to standardize on one communication platform. Google Users use Google Talk. Microsoft users use Lync/OCS). Some businesses use Blackberries and their communication tech. They don’t have their workers talking about company shit over unmanageable IM protocols. They can tend to block those protocols on their networks with the Firewalls, though, in some cases!
And really unless you need Outlook or Evolution for business use, there’s literally no reason not to use something like Windows Live Essentials, anyways (Live Mail has all this consumer-oriented PIM functionality built-in).
People buy outlook because they need a business-focused tool, want something more integrated with Microsoft’s ecosystem (including Windows Live, these days), or specifically need to connect to Exchange Serviers (via ActiveSync or the Exchange protocols – Exchange Server, Office365, Hosted Exchange acconts, Windows Live via Exchange ActiveSync, etc.).
sorry i should write url of Kontact. [kontact.org]
i am not able to open my “contacts”. I keep getting an error message when clicking on any contact which reads “an error occurred while attempting to open the windows address file”. help