<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: CyberNotes: Windows Explorer Groups and Stacks in Vista</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 23:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: steve</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-146687</link> <dc:creator>steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:03:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-146687</guid> <description>How come the games explorer keeps going back to &quot;Last Played&quot; and autosorting, even tho I keep turning auto off and begging it to just sort by name..PLEASE ! thanks in advance, Steve</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come the games explorer keeps going back to &#8220;Last Played&#8221; and autosorting, even tho I keep turning auto off and begging it to just sort by name..PLEASE !<br /> thanks in advance,<br /> Steve</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-127650</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 22:09:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-127650</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-127611&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DKong wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Scratch that…if you change the folder to a “documents” folder, you can group stuff inside them :D.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Yep, I&#039;m glad you figured that out! :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-127611" rel="nofollow">DKong wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Scratch that…if you change the folder to a “documents” folder, you can group stuff inside them <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p></blockquote></div><p>Yep, I&#8217;m glad you figured that out! <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DKong</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-127611</link> <dc:creator>DKong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:23:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-127611</guid> <description>Scratch that...if you change the folder to a &quot;documents&quot; folder, you can group stuff inside them :D.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scratch that&#8230;if you change the folder to a &#8220;documents&#8221; folder, you can group stuff inside them <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DKong</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-127609</link> <dc:creator>DKong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:21:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-127609</guid> <description>One big issue with this is that you can&#039;t group stuff within subfolders.For instance, I&#039;m currently sharing a laptop with vista on it with my sister. We both have a folder in documents for our stuff. But thus, since they are just subfolders in the documents folder, nothing inside can be grouped.It&#039;s sad.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One big issue with this is that you can&#8217;t group stuff within subfolders.</p><p>For instance, I&#8217;m currently sharing a laptop with vista on it with my sister. We both have a folder in documents for our stuff. But thus, since they are just subfolders in the documents folder, nothing inside can be grouped.</p><p>It&#8217;s sad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kolz Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows Vista Tip: Organize Your Files in Explorer with Stacks</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-121137</link> <dc:creator>Kolz Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Windows Vista Tip: Organize Your Files in Explorer with Stacks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:02:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-121137</guid> <description>[...] window. If you&#039;ve got your own favorite Explorer view, let&#039;s hear about it in the comments. Windows Explorer Groups and Stacks in Vista [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] window. If you&#8217;ve got your own favorite Explorer view, let&#8217;s hear about it in the comments. Windows Explorer Groups and Stacks in Vista [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jacques</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-120273</link> <dc:creator>jacques</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:51:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-120273</guid> <description>@Leo ?!!...just keep cool AND you&#039;ll feel better OR try to think twice !!! XOR you gonna get furious, it seems! Today, you can relax AND laugh a bit: just search AND jump to Mac OS Leopard review! Think you&#039;ll appreciate one OR other comix. :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Leo<br /> ?!!&#8230;just keep cool AND you&#8217;ll feel better OR try to think twice !!!<br /> XOR you gonna get furious, it seems!<br /> Today, you can relax AND laugh a bit: just search AND jump to Mac OS Leopard review! Think you&#8217;ll appreciate one OR other comix. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-120233</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:55:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-120233</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-120164&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Leo wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;What about save searches? What about using saved searches instead of real folders like smart folders in Mac OS X? What about the AND, OR and NOT operators? What about the index of searches that is basically a piece of s*it?I’ve wasted my time here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Must be your first time stopping by here. We&#039;ve already written about that: http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-advanced-search-operators-in-vista-and-windows-desktop-search/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-120164" rel="nofollow">Leo wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>What about save searches? What about using saved searches instead of real folders like smart folders in Mac OS X? What about the AND, OR and NOT operators? What about the index of searches that is basically a piece of s*it?</p><p>I’ve wasted my time here.</p></blockquote></div><p>Must be your first time stopping by here. We&#8217;ve already written about that:<br /> [<a href='http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-advanced-search-operators-in-vista-and-windows-desktop-search/' rel='nofollow'>cybernetnews.com</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Leo</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-120164</link> <dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:58:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-120164</guid> <description>What about save searches? What about using saved searches instead of real folders like smart folders in Mac OS X? What about the AND, OR and NOT operators? What about the index of searches that is basically a piece of s*it?I&#039;ve wasted my time here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about save searches? What about using saved searches instead of real folders like smart folders in Mac OS X? What about the AND, OR and NOT operators? What about the index of searches that is basically a piece of s*it?</p><p>I&#8217;ve wasted my time here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-119760</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:26:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-119760</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-119680&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jacques wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Vista is so blamed everywhere that it’s good to hear about some its features&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Vista is heavily criticized, and a lot of the people who I hear hate it are often the ones who haven&#039;t even tried it. They just hear about stories from other people and they decide they want to stay away from it.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-119688&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Asgard wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-119680&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jacques wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Ryan wrote “….But it’s better to run Vista with 2Go ram to get all of it. Below, complaining is just not honnest!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Vista runs clearly even better with 4Gb of ram. Then it takes full advantage of SuperFetch, and programs loads much faster. Also desktop works smoother. Ram is almost free nowadays so í really recommend 4gb + 64bit Vista especially for high-end machines.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I have 3GB on one of my machines, and 2GB on the other two machines running Vista. I want to use 64-bit Vista on my computer but there are problems with drivers and such that have not been completely developed, and I don&#039;t feel like jumping through hoops trying to get it to work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-119680" rel="nofollow">jacques wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Vista is so blamed everywhere that it’s good to hear about some its features</p></blockquote></div><p>Vista is heavily criticized, and a lot of the people who I hear hate it are often the ones who haven&#8217;t even tried it. They just hear about stories from other people and they decide they want to stay away from it.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-119688" rel="nofollow">Asgard wrote:</a><br /><blockquote><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-119680" rel="nofollow">jacques wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Ryan wrote “….But it’s better to run Vista with 2Go ram to get all of it. Below, complaining is just not honnest!</p></blockquote></div><p>Vista runs clearly even better with 4Gb of ram. Then it takes full advantage of SuperFetch, and programs loads much faster. Also desktop works smoother. Ram is almost free nowadays so í really recommend 4gb + 64bit Vista especially for high-end machines.</p></blockquote></div><p>I have 3GB on one of my machines, and 2GB on the other two machines running Vista. I want to use 64-bit Vista on my computer but there are problems with drivers and such that have not been completely developed, and I don&#8217;t feel like jumping through hoops trying to get it to work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jacques</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-119702</link> <dc:creator>jacques</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:55:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/10/22/cybernotes-windows-explorer-groups-and-stacks-in-vista/#comment-119702</guid> <description>Lucky Asgard! Sure the more ram you have the better you run vista ! I&#039;m allright with you! But it seems that for the moment my HP notebook cannot eat more than 2Go. I Hope not having to change it! Hope I can bypass this one of these days with 2x 2Go ram banks ! It&#039;s a Compaq Presario V6149, I.dual core2, x86. Has someone a tip to go further than the oem mentionned 2Go? That&#039;s really annoying.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky Asgard! Sure the more ram you have the better you run vista !<br /> I&#8217;m allright with you!<br /> But it seems that for the moment my HP notebook cannot eat more than 2Go. I Hope not having to change it! Hope I can bypass this one of these days with 2x 2Go ram banks ! It&#8217;s a Compaq Presario V6149, I.dual core2, x86. Has someone a tip to go further than the oem mentionned 2Go? That&#8217;s really annoying.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 314/335 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 19:32:18 -->
