<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delicious 2.0 Preview Shows Off New Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:57:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-115319</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-115319</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-115302&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;There should at least be something mentioning the Y! ownership.  A “powered by Y!” icon or something.  Also, Yahoo! should link to it.  It isn’t even mentioned in the “everything Yahoo!” page.  When Yahoo! buys something they shouldn’t just leave it exactly how it was before.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I definitely agree with you there. I even think they should advertise it a bit more and show more casual Internet users how they could benefit from it. Maybe even integration into the email service?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115302" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>There should at least be something mentioning the Y! ownership.  A “powered by Y!” icon or something.  Also, Yahoo! should link to it.  It isn’t even mentioned in the “everything Yahoo!” page.  When Yahoo! buys something they shouldn’t just leave it exactly how it was before.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I definitely agree with you there. I even think they should advertise it a bit more and show more casual Internet users how they could benefit from it. Maybe even integration into the email service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-115302</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 01:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-115302</guid>
		<description>There should at least be something mentioning the Y! ownership.  A &quot;powered by Y!&quot; icon or something.  Also, Yahoo! should link to it.  It isn&#039;t even mentioned in the &quot;everything Yahoo!&quot; page.  When Yahoo! buys something they shouldn&#039;t just leave it exactly how it was before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should at least be something mentioning the Y! ownership.  A &#8220;powered by Y!&#8221; icon or something.  Also, Yahoo! should link to it.  It isn&#8217;t even mentioned in the &#8220;everything Yahoo!&#8221; page.  When Yahoo! buys something they shouldn&#8217;t just leave it exactly how it was before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-115091</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-115091</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-115019&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netster007x wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m surprised it isn’t delicious.yahoo.com&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I think that would be like them doing flickr.yahoo.com - that just isn&#039;t very catchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-115019" rel="nofollow">netster007x wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I’m surprised it isn’t delicious.yahoo.com</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I think that would be like them doing flickr.yahoo.com &#8211; that just isn&#8217;t very catchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netster007x</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-115019</link>
		<dc:creator>netster007x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-115019</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised it isn&#039;t delicious.yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised it isn&#8217;t delicious.yahoo.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-114988</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 20:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-114988</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-114924&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dpotts wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh come on, it’s not del.icio.us without the dots.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Yeah, that&#039;s what I was thinking.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-114935&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Inferno_str1ke wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I reckon the name change is down to the fact that if people hear about a bookmarking site called delicious, they’ll go home and type “delicious.com” into their browser.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
That&#039;s true, but they already own that domain so they could just redirect delicious.com to del.icio.us.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-114961&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tinhed wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Del.icio.us or delicious.com. doesnt make a huge difference.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Actually it does make quite a bit of a difference. They need something catchy so that people can remember it.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-114969&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;KylesCove wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;They are dropping the dots?   This is great news because all that dot intermixing was giving me carpal tunnel.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Maybe we should do away with dots all together in domains. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-114924" rel="nofollow">dpotts wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Oh come on, it’s not del.icio.us without the dots.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s what I was thinking.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-114935" rel="nofollow">Inferno_str1ke wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I reckon the name change is down to the fact that if people hear about a bookmarking site called delicious, they’ll go home and type “delicious.com” into their browser.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>That&#8217;s true, but they already own that domain so they could just redirect delicious.com to del.icio.us.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-114961" rel="nofollow">Tinhed wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Del.icio.us or delicious.com. doesnt make a huge difference.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Actually it does make quite a bit of a difference. They need something catchy so that people can remember it.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-114969" rel="nofollow">KylesCove wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>They are dropping the dots?   This is great news because all that dot intermixing was giving me carpal tunnel.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Maybe we should do away with dots all together in domains. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KylesCove</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-114969</link>
		<dc:creator>KylesCove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-114969</guid>
		<description>They are dropping the dots?   This is great news because all that dot intermixing was giving me carpal tunnel.  

I do think they should own the Delicious domain if they are going to do this, though, and have it redirect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are dropping the dots?   This is great news because all that dot intermixing was giving me carpal tunnel.  </p>
<p>I do think they should own the Delicious domain if they are going to do this, though, and have it redirect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-114961</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-114961</guid>
		<description>Del.icio.us or delicious.com. doesnt make a huge difference. what does is how users will take to the new site design. The screenshots look good enough for me. And what is the use of making a preview page available if we cant customise it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Del.icio.us or delicious.com. doesnt make a huge difference. what does is how users will take to the new site design. The screenshots look good enough for me. And what is the use of making a preview page available if we cant customise it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inferno_str1ke</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-114935</link>
		<dc:creator>Inferno_str1ke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-114935</guid>
		<description>I reckon the name change is down to the fact that if people hear about a bookmarking site called delicious, they&#039;ll go home and type &quot;delicious.com&quot; into their browser. As most people are still on IE and don&#039;t have browse by name (Google do offer this in their toolbar) that&#039;s how they find a site, stick .com on the end. What I don&#039;t get is that at the moment delicious.com redirects to del.iciou.us, and to be honest I do reckon that split up name adds something (not to mention that it&#039;s been copied many times now).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon the name change is down to the fact that if people hear about a bookmarking site called delicious, they&#8217;ll go home and type &#8220;delicious.com&#8221; into their browser. As most people are still on IE and don&#8217;t have browse by name (Google do offer this in their toolbar) that&#8217;s how they find a site, stick .com on the end. What I don&#8217;t get is that at the moment delicious.com redirects to del.iciou.us, and to be honest I do reckon that split up name adds something (not to mention that it&#8217;s been copied many times now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpotts</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/comment-page-1/#comment-114924</link>
		<dc:creator>dpotts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2007/09/06/delicious-20-preview-shows-off-new-name/#comment-114924</guid>
		<description>Oh come on, it&#039;s not del.icio.us without the dots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on, it&#8217;s not del.icio.us without the dots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
