<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Digital Universe, The Anti-Wikipedia?</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/digital-universe-the-anti-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/digital-universe-the-anti-wikipedia/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 23:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: ANARCK</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/digital-universe-the-anti-wikipedia/#comment-154169</link> <dc:creator>ANARCK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:10:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/25/digital-universe-the-anti-wikipedia/#comment-154169</guid> <description>Wiki-pee-dia? Experts??? A almost-communist site where every dumbass can edit? NO THANKS!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiki-pee-dia? Experts??? A almost-communist site where every dumbass can edit? NO THANKS!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TheBizofKnowledge</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/digital-universe-the-anti-wikipedia/#comment-7476</link> <dc:creator>TheBizofKnowledge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:14:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/07/25/digital-universe-the-anti-wikipedia/#comment-7476</guid> <description>You&#039;re right about Wikipedia. Even though I&#039;ve occasionally come across some inaccuracies, they always get noticed and corrected in a timely manner. In general, I would have to say it&#039;s a pretty reliable source of information. I wouldn&#039;t take it as the gospel truth without verifying first, but it&#039;s great as a quick reference source. Digital Universe? Meh.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about Wikipedia. Even though I&#8217;ve occasionally come across some inaccuracies, they always get noticed and corrected in a timely manner. In general, I would have to say it&#8217;s a pretty reliable source of information. I wouldn&#8217;t take it as the gospel truth without verifying first, but it&#8217;s great as a quick reference source. Digital Universe? Meh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 210/231 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 20:44:14 -->
