<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: DivShare Disappoints &#8211; No Longer Unlimited</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Blog &#187; DivShare 3.0 Sports a New Interface : Erzwan.com</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-145826</link> <dc:creator>Blog &#187; DivShare 3.0 Sports a New Interface : Erzwan.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:04:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-145826</guid> <description>[...] right away has over 623,000 users notwithstanding moving divided from their &quot;unlimited&quot; storage as well as bandwidth indication which they once offered. To try as well [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] right away has over 623,000 users notwithstanding moving divided from their &#8220;unlimited&#8221; storage as well as bandwidth indication which they once offered. To try as well [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-130151</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:42:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-130151</guid> <description>We used Yahoo! for awhile for hosting, and I think it is good for the casual user. The only problem we had was that they didn&#039;t give you control over the .htaccess file, which made doing some things extremely difficult.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used Yahoo! for awhile for hosting, and I think it is good for the casual user. The only problem we had was that they didn&#8217;t give you control over the .htaccess file, which made doing some things extremely difficult.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-130130</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:57:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-130130</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129806&quot;&gt;The Guru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll ignore the comment about GoDaddy being terrible unless you are referring to that fact it is violation of our Hosting Terms of Services to use a shared hosting account as file repository.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;I test-drove GoDaddy for about a month.  I had a fully functioning web application that would not run correctly on GoDaddy&#039;s servers.  It worked without any issues on two other hosting companies servers. The calls to support were fruitless - &quot;We don&#039;t support issues related to code&quot; is what I was told over and over.I finally decided it wasn&#039;t worth the hassle since &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.DotNetPark.com&#039; target=&#039;new&#039;&gt;DotNetPark&lt;/a&gt; offered a lower cost alternative that included a SQL database that I could use Enterprise Manager with, multiple site under a single account, and much more.I never had problems with any hosting company except GoDaddy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129806">The Guru wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I’ll ignore the comment about GoDaddy being terrible unless you are referring to that fact it is violation of our Hosting Terms of Services to use a shared hosting account as file repository.</p></blockquote></div><p>I test-drove GoDaddy for about a month.  I had a fully functioning web application that would not run correctly on GoDaddy&#8217;s servers.  It worked without any issues on two other hosting companies servers. The calls to support were fruitless &#8211; &#8220;We don&#8217;t support issues related to code&#8221; is what I was told over and over.</p><p>I finally decided it wasn&#8217;t worth the hassle since <a href='[<a href='http://www.DotNetPark.com' rel='nofollow'>DotNetPark.com</a>]' target='new'>DotNetPark offered a lower cost alternative that included a SQL database that I could use Enterprise Manager with, multiple site under a single account, and much more.</p><p>I never had problems with any hosting company except GoDaddy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129915</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129915</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129806&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Guru wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll ignore the comment about GoDaddy being terrible unless you are referring to that fact it is violation of our Hosting Terms of Services to use a shared hosting account as file repository.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Huh, that&#039;s news to me. I know people who setup personal accounts for that purpose, but I&#039;ll turn the other cheek. :roll: I wonder how many other hosts have that policy?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129806" rel="nofollow">The Guru wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I’ll ignore the comment about GoDaddy being terrible unless you are referring to that fact it is violation of our Hosting Terms of Services to use a shared hosting account as file repository.</p></blockquote></div><p>Huh, that&#8217;s news to me. I know people who setup personal accounts for that purpose, but I&#8217;ll turn the other cheek. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> I wonder how many other hosts have that policy?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leland</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129873</link> <dc:creator>leland</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:45:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129873</guid> <description>Interesting, it seems some of what I have been hearing about GoDaddy is true.  I have also heard of issues with them for just buying and managing your domains, though I have never personally had an issue with them for this.  I guess as they have grown the problems have become more visible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, it seems some of what I have been hearing about GoDaddy is true.  I have also heard of issues with them for just buying and managing your domains, though I have never personally had an issue with them for this.  I guess as they have grown the problems have become more visible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129846</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:59:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129846</guid> <description>i&#039;ve put my mail files on go daddy and didnt get to the limit of the hosting and one day the account was canceled. i called then and they told me that i cannot use the web hosting acount for hosting this kind of files(rar). so i guess that go daddy is not a solution. and i think that they limit the thread bandwidth.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve put my mail files on go daddy and didnt get to the limit of the hosting and one day the account was canceled.<br /> i called then and they told me that i cannot use the web hosting acount for hosting this kind of files(rar).<br /> so i guess that go daddy is not a solution.<br /> and i think that they limit the thread bandwidth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Guru</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129806</link> <dc:creator>The Guru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:46:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129806</guid> <description>I&#039;ll ignore the comment about GoDaddy being terrible unless you are referring to that fact it is violation of our Hosting Terms of Services to use a shared hosting account as file repository.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll ignore the comment about GoDaddy being terrible unless you are referring to that fact it is violation of our Hosting Terms of Services to use a shared hosting account as file repository.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129759</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129759</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129748&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lashiec wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Why? PhotoBucket has the same restrictions, and it’s growing and growing each day. Of course, they’re backed by a powerful corporation, but I think divShare won’t have any problems even with those restrictions. Besides, who is going to need so many space and/or bandwidth? If their statistics are real, not many people is going to have problems.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I know several people who have only been using DivShare because of the unlimited storage that they were able to take advantage of. Not to mention the heavily trafficked sites that used it to embed videos, which will surely eat up the bandwidth. For awhile we were using them for embedding our videos, but this gives us even more reason to stick all of our media on viddler.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129758&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CoryC wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;GoDaddy is terrible!!!! Stay away!!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I haven&#039;t actually used them before, but I&#039;ll take your word for it. Regardless though, there are plenty of hosts out there that offer extreme amounts of storage and bandwidth for very little money.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129748" rel="nofollow">Lashiec wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Why? PhotoBucket has the same restrictions, and it’s growing and growing each day. Of course, they’re backed by a powerful corporation, but I think divShare won’t have any problems even with those restrictions. Besides, who is going to need so many space and/or bandwidth? If their statistics are real, not many people is going to have problems.</p></blockquote></div><p>I know several people who have only been using DivShare because of the unlimited storage that they were able to take advantage of. Not to mention the heavily trafficked sites that used it to embed videos, which will surely eat up the bandwidth. For awhile we were using them for embedding our videos, but this gives us even more reason to stick all of our media on viddler.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129758" rel="nofollow">CoryC wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>GoDaddy is terrible!!!! Stay away!!!</p></blockquote></div><p>I haven&#8217;t actually used them before, but I&#8217;ll take your word for it. Regardless though, there are plenty of hosts out there that offer extreme amounts of storage and bandwidth for very little money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129758</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:43:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129758</guid> <description>GoDaddy is terrible!!!! Stay away!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GoDaddy is terrible!!!! Stay away!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lashiec</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129748</link> <dc:creator>Lashiec</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:49:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/18/divshare-disappoints-no-longer-unlimited/#comment-129748</guid> <description>[quote] Is this the day DivShare died? [/quote] Why? PhotoBucket has the same restrictions, and it&#039;s growing and growing each day. Of course, they&#039;re backed by a powerful corporation, but I think divShare won&#039;t have any problems even with those restrictions. Besides, who is going to need so many space and/or bandwidth? If their statistics are real, not many people is going to have problems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]<br /> Is this the day DivShare died?<br /> [/quote]<br /> Why? PhotoBucket has the same restrictions, and it&#8217;s growing and growing each day. Of course, they&#8217;re backed by a powerful corporation, but I think divShare won&#8217;t have any problems even with those restrictions. Besides, who is going to need so many space and/or bandwidth? If their statistics are real, not many people is going to have problems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 296/315 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 06:22:57 -->
