<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do you think Firefox is Becoming Bloated?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:19:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96355</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never actually used Adblock, but I don&#039;t know if I&#039;m still fond of the whole Flashblock thing yet. I visit hundreds of unique sites everyday and many are to watch videos that are embedded. I guess for my browsing needs it doesn&#039;t work well, but for others it can do just the trick.

Thanks for the recommedations Fox. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never actually used Adblock, but I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;m still fond of the whole Flashblock thing yet. I visit hundreds of unique sites everyday and many are to watch videos that are embedded. I guess for my browsing needs it doesn&#8217;t work well, but for others it can do just the trick.</p>
<p>Thanks for the recommedations Fox. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96264</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 18:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96264</guid>
		<description>&quot;Adblock Plus EasyList&quot; should be &quot;Adblock Plus with EasyList&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Adblock Plus EasyList&#8221; should be &#8220;Adblock Plus with EasyList&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96263</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 18:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96263</guid>
		<description>Ryan: if i remember right, Flashblock has allow list, so you can whitelist Youtube and so on.
But i don&#039;t use it, i use Adblock Plus   EasyList filterlist, and that&#039;s better solution for Flash memory usage problems.
http://adblockplus.org/en/
http://easylist.adblockplus.org/
because that way you don&#039;t see flash ads, those are really blocked and not just covered with Flashblock -button, (maybe i did use bad Flashblock -version, because sometimes flash did play little bit and then it was covered with play button.)
And with Adblock Plus   EasyList, you can still enjoy Flash video sites and so on.
And if you wanna see ads on some sites and support them, you can turn off adblock on those sites:
http://adblockplus.org/en/faq_basics#disable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan: if i remember right, Flashblock has allow list, so you can whitelist Youtube and so on.<br />
But i don&#8217;t use it, i use Adblock Plus   EasyList filterlist, and that&#8217;s better solution for Flash memory usage problems.<br />
[<a href='http://adblockplus.org/en/' rel='nofollow'>adblockplus.org</a>]<br />
[<a href='http://easylist.adblockplus.org/' rel='nofollow'>easylist.adblockplus.org</a>]<br />
because that way you don&#8217;t see flash ads, those are really blocked and not just covered with Flashblock -button, (maybe i did use bad Flashblock -version, because sometimes flash did play little bit and then it was covered with play button.)<br />
And with Adblock Plus   EasyList, you can still enjoy Flash video sites and so on.<br />
And if you wanna see ads on some sites and support them, you can turn off adblock on those sites:<br />
[<a href='http://adblockplus.org/en/faq_basics#disable' rel='nofollow'>adblockplus.org</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 17:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96261</guid>
		<description>@Morcas: I know that you&#039;re not criticizing me, I was just saying what my experiences are with Firefox. I can&#039;t believe that you opened that many tabs in Firefox and it only peaked at 82MB! After just 15 minutes of browsing mine is well over that. :)

@Fox: Their recomendation for elimating the Flash memory problem is simply disabling it by using the Flashblock extension. I don&#039;t think that is much of a solution considering many of the sites I visit use Flash in some fashion.  :&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Morcas: I know that you&#8217;re not criticizing me, I was just saying what my experiences are with Firefox. I can&#8217;t believe that you opened that many tabs in Firefox and it only peaked at 82MB! After just 15 minutes of browsing mine is well over that. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Fox: Their recomendation for elimating the Flash memory problem is simply disabling it by using the Flashblock extension. I don&#8217;t think that is much of a solution considering many of the sites I visit use Flash in some fashion.  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96254</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 16:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96254</guid>
		<description>Ryan:&lt;blockquote&gt;@Fox: I have seen that â€œfixâ€ before that you mentioned, but that doesnâ€™t seem to fix things for me. It does make sense that it would be the cause of the problem since I see larger memory usage on systems with more RAM, but Iâ€™ve never seen this actually work by manually adjusting the values.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Reducing_memory_usage_-_Firefox
That page also says a lot about plugins memory usage, like if you have Shockwave plugin, it can eat 100 MB or more.
And read that Java memory usage -page too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan:<br />
<blockquote>@Fox: I have seen that â€œfixâ€ before that you mentioned, but that doesnâ€™t seem to fix things for me. It does make sense that it would be the cause of the problem since I see larger memory usage on systems with more RAM, but Iâ€™ve never seen this actually work by manually adjusting the values.</p></blockquote>
<p>[<a href='http://kb.mozillazine.org/Reducing_memory_usage_-_Firefox' rel='nofollow'>kb.mozillazine.org</a>]<br />
That page also says a lot about plugins memory usage, like if you have Shockwave plugin, it can eat 100 MB or more.<br />
And read that Java memory usage -page too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morcas</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96246</link>
		<dc:creator>Morcas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 06:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96246</guid>
		<description>Ryan, please don&#039;t think I am criticising you, believer me, that is not my intention. It&#039;s just that this story pops up every few months or so, and whilst I don&#039;t for one minute say fx is memory friendly, I also don&#039;t believe it&#039;s a &#039;hog&#039;

I&#039;m not on broadband, so I can&#039;t surf 24/7, but I do leave fx open, as I use scrapbook for research, so I&#039;m constantly in and out for most or the day.

You know I really tried to get fx to use memory. One day I set TMP to allow 10 rows of tabs, I then filled those rows. fx memory peaked at 82Mb. In process explorer I watched for 10 minutes or so,  and memory didn&#039;t move.

I have to wonder if it&#039;s down to extensions and plugins. Every extension I have installed, has been tested individually, to check memory leaks, none do, and all play happily together. Also, as I said, I use VLC for any multimedia, having disabled any MS stuff. I also don&#039;t use flash, shockwave or java. I see no need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, please don&#8217;t think I am criticising you, believer me, that is not my intention. It&#8217;s just that this story pops up every few months or so, and whilst I don&#8217;t for one minute say fx is memory friendly, I also don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s a &#8216;hog&#8217;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not on broadband, so I can&#8217;t surf 24/7, but I do leave fx open, as I use scrapbook for research, so I&#8217;m constantly in and out for most or the day.</p>
<p>You know I really tried to get fx to use memory. One day I set TMP to allow 10 rows of tabs, I then filled those rows. fx memory peaked at 82Mb. In process explorer I watched for 10 minutes or so,  and memory didn&#8217;t move.</p>
<p>I have to wonder if it&#8217;s down to extensions and plugins. Every extension I have installed, has been tested individually, to check memory leaks, none do, and all play happily together. Also, as I said, I use VLC for any multimedia, having disabled any MS stuff. I also don&#8217;t use flash, shockwave or java. I see no need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96218</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96218</guid>
		<description>@Morcas: I guess it just depends on the installation then. I have Firefox on 3 computers, 2 of which I use frequently and I have memory problems with both. :(

Maybe it has something to do with the hundreds, if not thousands of tabs I open and close everyday without restarting the browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Morcas: I guess it just depends on the installation then. I have Firefox on 3 computers, 2 of which I use frequently and I have memory problems with both. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Maybe it has something to do with the hundreds, if not thousands of tabs I open and close everyday without restarting the browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morcas</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96208</link>
		<dc:creator>Morcas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96208</guid>
		<description>You right Ryan, it is only 4 years, it was late 2003 when I picked up the first alpha. I still have the file in my archive :)

I&#039;m not the only one claiming not to have memory problems, which by the way I don&#039;t. Seriously, if fx is using 250Mb plus memory, you must have a problem somewhere, As I said fx has never used more than 80Mb of memory, even with multiple taps open, 27 extensions installed and left to run for several hours.

By the way, I also installed fx on a friends machine, that has 1GB, the memory usage is similar to mine, so having more memory is not an excuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You right Ryan, it is only 4 years, it was late 2003 when I picked up the first alpha. I still have the file in my archive <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the only one claiming not to have memory problems, which by the way I don&#8217;t. Seriously, if fx is using 250Mb plus memory, you must have a problem somewhere, As I said fx has never used more than 80Mb of memory, even with multiple taps open, 27 extensions installed and left to run for several hours.</p>
<p>By the way, I also installed fx on a friends machine, that has 1GB, the memory usage is similar to mine, so having more memory is not an excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96201</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96201</guid>
		<description>Well I for one am a avid Firefox user. I use it work, on my Ubuntu Linux laptop and on my Win XP Pro desktop.  I really don&#039;t see myself using any other browser.

BTW: Nice image of a fatter fox  :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I for one am a avid Firefox user. I use it work, on my Ubuntu Linux laptop and on my Win XP Pro desktop.  I really don&#8217;t see myself using any other browser.</p>
<p>BTW: Nice image of a fatter fox  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/comment-page-1/#comment-96196</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 16:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/05/17/do-you-think-firefox-is-becoming-bloated/#comment-96196</guid>
		<description>I tried songbird but not on a PIII but I didn&#039;t think it was too fast (as I remember but I could be wrong).  I think it is CPU usage for me because it acts similarly to Java/JS (it is not noticeable if you CPU is faster than 1GHz).  I suspect firefox is snappier on linux but haven&#039;t verified it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried songbird but not on a PIII but I didn&#8217;t think it was too fast (as I remember but I could be wrong).  I think it is CPU usage for me because it acts similarly to Java/JS (it is not noticeable if you CPU is faster than 1GHz).  I suspect firefox is snappier on linux but haven&#8217;t verified it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
