<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Download Safari 3.1 with Speed Improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:53:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: raptor</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133788</link>
		<dc:creator>raptor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133788</guid>
		<description>firefox RULES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firefox RULES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hirschi</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133492</link>
		<dc:creator>hirschi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133492</guid>
		<description>You should include the latest WebKit nightly builds!
WebKit (Mar 22th): 3515.2ms +/- 2.6%
FireFox (3b4): 4066.6ms +/- 6.4%
Both tested on a MacBook Pro latest rev.
In accordance with the WebKit Blog (Surfin Safari) WebKit has almost passed the Acid3 Test (95/100)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should include the latest WebKit nightly builds!<br />
WebKit (Mar 22th): 3515.2ms +/- 2.6%<br />
FireFox (3b4): 4066.6ms +/- 6.4%<br />
Both tested on a MacBook Pro latest rev.<br />
In accordance with the WebKit Blog (Surfin Safari) WebKit has almost passed the Acid3 Test (95/100)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133471</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133471</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133452&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Transcontinental wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Basivally, Apple communicates even worse than Microsoft. What I like with Firefox, after its qualities, is the community, the information, aimed at and accessible by all, and not only techies!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Firefox&#039;s community is definitely one of a kind, and you can find help for almost anything out there. That&#039;s one of the reasons I use it, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133452" rel="nofollow">Transcontinental wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Basivally, Apple communicates even worse than Microsoft. What I like with Firefox, after its qualities, is the community, the information, aimed at and accessible by all, and not only techies!</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Firefox&#8217;s community is definitely one of a kind, and you can find help for almost anything out there. That&#8217;s one of the reasons I use it, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transcontinental</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133452</link>
		<dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been on Safari&#039;s pages. What amazes me is that it looks like Apple doesn&#039;t take into consideration that Windows is a different context, that many users know IE and/or FF and/or Opera, mainly because these browsers (particularly the first two) handle fundamental aspects of a browser with common references concerning RAM, cookies, caches, history ... Apple has always given me the feeling that it was either devoted to geeks either devoted to silence.

I&#039;m not going to start a new browser when it seems so tough to find answers on what nowadays is the basis of Internet browsing security : cookies, history, caches.

Basivally, Apple communicates even worse than Microsoft. What I like with Firefox, after its qualities, is the community, the information, aimed at and accessible by all, and not only techies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on Safari&#8217;s pages. What amazes me is that it looks like Apple doesn&#8217;t take into consideration that Windows is a different context, that many users know IE and/or FF and/or Opera, mainly because these browsers (particularly the first two) handle fundamental aspects of a browser with common references concerning RAM, cookies, caches, history &#8230; Apple has always given me the feeling that it was either devoted to geeks either devoted to silence.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to start a new browser when it seems so tough to find answers on what nowadays is the basis of Internet browsing security : cookies, history, caches.</p>
<p>Basivally, Apple communicates even worse than Microsoft. What I like with Firefox, after its qualities, is the community, the information, aimed at and accessible by all, and not only techies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133356</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133356</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133346&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;emil wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;off topic. what happened, no posts in 2 days. i hope everything is ok&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
We&#039;ve still been posting every day. Is something not showing up for you?

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133350&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spencer wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Got it downloaded.  Don’t see any visible speed improvements, but always good to have the latest.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
True that. I have it downloaded on one of my machines, but it sees very little run time. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133346" rel="nofollow">emil wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>off topic. what happened, no posts in 2 days. i hope everything is ok</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>We&#8217;ve still been posting every day. Is something not showing up for you?</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133350" rel="nofollow">Spencer wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Got it downloaded.  Don’t see any visible speed improvements, but always good to have the latest.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>True that. I have it downloaded on one of my machines, but it sees very little run time. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133350</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133350</guid>
		<description>Got it downloaded.  Don&#039;t see any visible speed improvements, but always good to have the latest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it downloaded.  Don&#8217;t see any visible speed improvements, but always good to have the latest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emil</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133346</link>
		<dc:creator>emil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133346</guid>
		<description>off topic. what happened, no posts in 2 days. i hope everything is ok</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>off topic. what happened, no posts in 2 days. i hope everything is ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133316</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133316</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133284&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Too bad it’s so ugly. When will Apple get it through their heads that Windows applications should use the Windows style and not OS X. Last time I tried this it was junk anyway, I’ll stick with Firefox.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
The looks is definitely a killer for me, but I think Apple is trying to push their design practices into Windows machines. That&#039;s what they&#039;ve done with iTunes, and it will give people a more comfortable feeling if they ever get on the verge of switching to Mac OS X.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133300&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It seems a bit faster but still not that great. Also did my previous comment get removed because I said I didn’t like it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Nope, you&#039;re comment is still there. There may have been a caching delay before your comment appeared, but it shouldn&#039;t have been very long.

&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133307&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leland wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Speed is one thing but usability and the ability to customize the browser is another.  While the speed may be nice, it’s not enough to get me to consider a switch.  For me it’s FF3 all the way with Opera for a backup.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I do enjoy the customizability of a browser, but performance is extremely important to me. I&#039;m just glad that Firefox 3 is so close to the performance of Safari otherwise I would be really tempted to switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133284" rel="nofollow">Mark wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Too bad it’s so ugly. When will Apple get it through their heads that Windows applications should use the Windows style and not OS X. Last time I tried this it was junk anyway, I’ll stick with Firefox.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>The looks is definitely a killer for me, but I think Apple is trying to push their design practices into Windows machines. That&#8217;s what they&#8217;ve done with iTunes, and it will give people a more comfortable feeling if they ever get on the verge of switching to Mac OS X.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133300" rel="nofollow">Mark wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>It seems a bit faster but still not that great. Also did my previous comment get removed because I said I didn’t like it?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Nope, you&#8217;re comment is still there. There may have been a caching delay before your comment appeared, but it shouldn&#8217;t have been very long.</p>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133307" rel="nofollow">leland wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Speed is one thing but usability and the ability to customize the browser is another.  While the speed may be nice, it’s not enough to get me to consider a switch.  For me it’s FF3 all the way with Opera for a backup.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I do enjoy the customizability of a browser, but performance is extremely important to me. I&#8217;m just glad that Firefox 3 is so close to the performance of Safari otherwise I would be really tempted to switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leland</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133307</link>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133307</guid>
		<description>Speed is one thing but usability and the ability to customize the browser is another.  While the speed may be nice, it&#039;s not enough to get me to consider a switch.  For me it&#039;s FF3 all the way with Opera for a backup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed is one thing but usability and the ability to customize the browser is another.  While the speed may be nice, it&#8217;s not enough to get me to consider a switch.  For me it&#8217;s FF3 all the way with Opera for a backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-133300</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133300</guid>
		<description>It seems a bit faster but still not that great. Also did my previous comment get removed because I said I didn&#039;t like it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a bit faster but still not that great. Also did my previous comment get removed because I said I didn&#8217;t like it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
