<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Download Safari 3.1 with Speed Improvements</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 23:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: raptor</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133788</link> <dc:creator>raptor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:48:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133788</guid> <description>firefox RULES!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>firefox RULES!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hirschi</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133492</link> <dc:creator>hirschi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:09:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133492</guid> <description>You should include the latest WebKit nightly builds! WebKit (Mar 22th): 3515.2ms +/- 2.6% FireFox (3b4): 4066.6ms +/- 6.4% Both tested on a MacBook Pro latest rev. In accordance with the WebKit Blog (Surfin Safari) WebKit has almost passed the Acid3 Test (95/100)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should include the latest WebKit nightly builds!<br /> WebKit (Mar 22th): 3515.2ms +/- 2.6%<br /> FireFox (3b4): 4066.6ms +/- 6.4%<br /> Both tested on a MacBook Pro latest rev.<br /> In accordance with the WebKit Blog (Surfin Safari) WebKit has almost passed the Acid3 Test (95/100)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133471</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:48:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133471</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133452&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Transcontinental wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Basivally, Apple communicates even worse than Microsoft. What I like with Firefox, after its qualities, is the community, the information, aimed at and accessible by all, and not only techies!&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Firefox&#039;s community is definitely one of a kind, and you can find help for almost anything out there. That&#039;s one of the reasons I use it, too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133452" rel="nofollow">Transcontinental wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Basivally, Apple communicates even worse than Microsoft. What I like with Firefox, after its qualities, is the community, the information, aimed at and accessible by all, and not only techies!</p></blockquote></div><p>Firefox&#8217;s community is definitely one of a kind, and you can find help for almost anything out there. That&#8217;s one of the reasons I use it, too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Transcontinental</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133452</link> <dc:creator>Transcontinental</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:42:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133452</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been on Safari&#039;s pages. What amazes me is that it looks like Apple doesn&#039;t take into consideration that Windows is a different context, that many users know IE and/or FF and/or Opera, mainly because these browsers (particularly the first two) handle fundamental aspects of a browser with common references concerning RAM, cookies, caches, history ... Apple has always given me the feeling that it was either devoted to geeks either devoted to silence.I&#039;m not going to start a new browser when it seems so tough to find answers on what nowadays is the basis of Internet browsing security : cookies, history, caches.Basivally, Apple communicates even worse than Microsoft. What I like with Firefox, after its qualities, is the community, the information, aimed at and accessible by all, and not only techies!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on Safari&#8217;s pages. What amazes me is that it looks like Apple doesn&#8217;t take into consideration that Windows is a different context, that many users know IE and/or FF and/or Opera, mainly because these browsers (particularly the first two) handle fundamental aspects of a browser with common references concerning RAM, cookies, caches, history &#8230; Apple has always given me the feeling that it was either devoted to geeks either devoted to silence.</p><p>I&#8217;m not going to start a new browser when it seems so tough to find answers on what nowadays is the basis of Internet browsing security : cookies, history, caches.</p><p>Basivally, Apple communicates even worse than Microsoft. What I like with Firefox, after its qualities, is the community, the information, aimed at and accessible by all, and not only techies!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133356</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133356</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133346&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;emil wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;off topic. what happened, no posts in 2 days. i hope everything is ok&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; We&#039;ve still been posting every day. Is something not showing up for you?&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133350&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spencer wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Got it downloaded.  Don’t see any visible speed improvements, but always good to have the latest.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; True that. I have it downloaded on one of my machines, but it sees very little run time. ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133346" rel="nofollow">emil wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>off topic. what happened, no posts in 2 days. i hope everything is ok</p></blockquote></div><p>We&#8217;ve still been posting every day. Is something not showing up for you?</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133350" rel="nofollow">Spencer wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Got it downloaded.  Don’t see any visible speed improvements, but always good to have the latest.</p></blockquote></div><p>True that. I have it downloaded on one of my machines, but it sees very little run time. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spencer</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133350</link> <dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133350</guid> <description>Got it downloaded.  Don&#039;t see any visible speed improvements, but always good to have the latest.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it downloaded.  Don&#8217;t see any visible speed improvements, but always good to have the latest.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: emil</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133346</link> <dc:creator>emil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:23:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133346</guid> <description>off topic. what happened, no posts in 2 days. i hope everything is ok</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>off topic. what happened, no posts in 2 days. i hope everything is ok</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133316</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:29:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133316</guid> <description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133284&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Too bad it’s so ugly. When will Apple get it through their heads that Windows applications should use the Windows style and not OS X. Last time I tried this it was junk anyway, I’ll stick with Firefox.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; The looks is definitely a killer for me, but I think Apple is trying to push their design practices into Windows machines. That&#039;s what they&#039;ve done with iTunes, and it will give people a more comfortable feeling if they ever get on the verge of switching to Mac OS X.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133300&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It seems a bit faster but still not that great. Also did my previous comment get removed because I said I didn’t like it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Nope, you&#039;re comment is still there. There may have been a caching delay before your comment appeared, but it shouldn&#039;t have been very long.&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-133307&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;leland wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Speed is one thing but usability and the ability to customize the browser is another.  While the speed may be nice, it’s not enough to get me to consider a switch.  For me it’s FF3 all the way with Opera for a backup.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I do enjoy the customizability of a browser, but performance is extremely important to me. I&#039;m just glad that Firefox 3 is so close to the performance of Safari otherwise I would be really tempted to switch.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133284" rel="nofollow">Mark wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Too bad it’s so ugly. When will Apple get it through their heads that Windows applications should use the Windows style and not OS X. Last time I tried this it was junk anyway, I’ll stick with Firefox.</p></blockquote></div><p>The looks is definitely a killer for me, but I think Apple is trying to push their design practices into Windows machines. That&#8217;s what they&#8217;ve done with iTunes, and it will give people a more comfortable feeling if they ever get on the verge of switching to Mac OS X.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133300" rel="nofollow">Mark wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>It seems a bit faster but still not that great. Also did my previous comment get removed because I said I didn’t like it?</p></blockquote></div><p>Nope, you&#8217;re comment is still there. There may have been a caching delay before your comment appeared, but it shouldn&#8217;t have been very long.</p><div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-133307" rel="nofollow">leland wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>Speed is one thing but usability and the ability to customize the browser is another.  While the speed may be nice, it’s not enough to get me to consider a switch.  For me it’s FF3 all the way with Opera for a backup.</p></blockquote></div><p>I do enjoy the customizability of a browser, but performance is extremely important to me. I&#8217;m just glad that Firefox 3 is so close to the performance of Safari otherwise I would be really tempted to switch.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leland</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133307</link> <dc:creator>leland</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:52:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133307</guid> <description>Speed is one thing but usability and the ability to customize the browser is another.  While the speed may be nice, it&#039;s not enough to get me to consider a switch.  For me it&#039;s FF3 all the way with Opera for a backup.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed is one thing but usability and the ability to customize the browser is another.  While the speed may be nice, it&#8217;s not enough to get me to consider a switch.  For me it&#8217;s FF3 all the way with Opera for a backup.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133300</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:03:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/03/18/download-safari-31-with-speed-improvements/#comment-133300</guid> <description>It seems a bit faster but still not that great. Also did my previous comment get removed because I said I didn&#039;t like it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a bit faster but still not that great. Also did my previous comment get removed because I said I didn&#8217;t like it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 302/323 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 18:24:10 -->
