<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Download uTorrent 1.7 Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/download-utorrent-17-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-utorrent-17-beta/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:45:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-utorrent-17-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-92947</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/05/download-utorrent-17-beta/#comment-92947</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-92846&quot;&gt;Kate wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I use BitComet. :roll: Yeah, I know I&#039;m not supposed to, because apparently someone decided that it&#039;s a &quot;selfish&quot; client. Thing is, most of those problems were fixed several versions ago. I mostly like BitComet because it&#039;s easy to use. Maybe I&#039;ll give uTorrent a try. I tried Azureus once, but it sucked so much of my computer&#039;s resources that I gave up. But tell the truth BitComet has become quite the resource hog itself in the last few versions. The only thing is that I&#039;m reluctant to try uTorrent now that Bittorrent is in bed with the MPAA and RIAA.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Azureus is definitely a resource sucker and I switched very quickly after trying that out for the first time. It is true that BitTorrent is becoming quite cuddly with the MPAA and RIAA, but if they ever implemented something that would make identifying a user easier then I would think that would be a breech of privacy and the user would first have to be told that they were doing that?

&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-92851&quot;&gt;Nosh wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Judging by the comments on their forum this beta is facing some serious teething problems.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I tried it out for a little while and I didn&#039;t think it was bad...seemed to be pretty stable for me on Vista and download speeds were pretty on par to what they normally are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-92846">Kate wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I use BitComet. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' />  Yeah, I know I&#8217;m not supposed to, because apparently someone decided that it&#8217;s a &#8220;selfish&#8221; client. Thing is, most of those problems were fixed several versions ago. I mostly like BitComet because it&#8217;s easy to use. Maybe I&#8217;ll give uTorrent a try. I tried Azureus once, but it sucked so much of my computer&#8217;s resources that I gave up. But tell the truth BitComet has become quite the resource hog itself in the last few versions. The only thing is that I&#8217;m reluctant to try uTorrent now that Bittorrent is in bed with the MPAA and RIAA.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Azureus is definitely a resource sucker and I switched very quickly after trying that out for the first time. It is true that BitTorrent is becoming quite cuddly with the MPAA and RIAA, but if they ever implemented something that would make identifying a user easier then I would think that would be a breech of privacy and the user would first have to be told that they were doing that?</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-92851">Nosh wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Judging by the comments on their forum this beta is facing some serious teething problems.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I tried it out for a little while and I didn&#8217;t think it was bad&#8230;seemed to be pretty stable for me on Vista and download speeds were pretty on par to what they normally are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosh</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-utorrent-17-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-92851</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/05/download-utorrent-17-beta/#comment-92851</guid>
		<description>Judging by the comments on their forum this beta is facing some serious teething problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the comments on their forum this beta is facing some serious teething problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-utorrent-17-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-92846</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 05:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/05/download-utorrent-17-beta/#comment-92846</guid>
		<description>I use BitComet. :roll: Yeah, I know I&#039;m not supposed to, because apparently someone decided that it&#039;s a &quot;selfish&quot; client. Thing is, most of those problems were fixed several versions ago. I mostly like BitComet because it&#039;s easy to use. Maybe I&#039;ll give uTorrent a try. I tried Azureus once, but it sucked so much of my computer&#039;s resources that I gave up. But tell the truth BitComet has become quite the resource hog itself in the last few versions. The only thing is that I&#039;m reluctant to try uTorrent now that Bittorrent is in bed with the MPAA and RIAA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use BitComet. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' />  Yeah, I know I&#8217;m not supposed to, because apparently someone decided that it&#8217;s a &#8220;selfish&#8221; client. Thing is, most of those problems were fixed several versions ago. I mostly like BitComet because it&#8217;s easy to use. Maybe I&#8217;ll give uTorrent a try. I tried Azureus once, but it sucked so much of my computer&#8217;s resources that I gave up. But tell the truth BitComet has become quite the resource hog itself in the last few versions. The only thing is that I&#8217;m reluctant to try uTorrent now that Bittorrent is in bed with the MPAA and RIAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-utorrent-17-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-92809</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/04/05/download-utorrent-17-beta/#comment-92809</guid>
		<description>uTorrent is still doing it for me. I don&#039;t understand why people would switch off when Bittorrent acquired uTorrent. It&#039;s still the same great client as always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uTorrent is still doing it for me. I don&#8217;t understand why people would switch off when Bittorrent acquired uTorrent. It&#8217;s still the same great client as always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
