<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Download Vista SP1 RC Refresh (6.0.6001.17028)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:18:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129631</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129631</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129603&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OldManDeath wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Did the searching and the only link found points to a non existent file.  Must have been removed.

Did you do yours via Windows Update?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Looks like the link posted by the above user works.

No, I did not do my via Windows Update because I did it before the update was even posted. It automagically appeared on my desktop. :roll:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129603" rel="nofollow">OldManDeath wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Did the searching and the only link found points to a non existent file.  Must have been removed.</p>
<p>Did you do yours via Windows Update?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Looks like the link posted by the above user works.</p>
<p>No, I did not do my via Windows Update because I did it before the update was even posted. It automagically appeared on my desktop. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129630</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129630</guid>
		<description>*cough* http://depositfiles.com/en/files/3022334 *cough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*cough* [<a href='http://depositfiles.com/en/files/3022334' rel='nofollow'>depositfiles.com</a>] *cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldManDeath</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129603</link>
		<dc:creator>OldManDeath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129603</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129590&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129563&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OldManDeath wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It appears there is no full file so you can do multiple computers like you could with the RC, and you have to do this through Windows Update.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Well, there is a full download available, just not by Microsoft. It just takes some searching around. I’ll just say to search for Windows6.0-KB936330-X86-wave0.exe ;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Did the searching and the only link found points to a non existent file.  Must have been removed.

Did you do yours via Windows Update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129590" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129563" rel="nofollow">OldManDeath wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>It appears there is no full file so you can do multiple computers like you could with the RC, and you have to do this through Windows Update.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Well, there is a full download available, just not by Microsoft. It just takes some searching around. I’ll just say to search for Windows6.0-KB936330-X86-wave0.exe <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Did the searching and the only link found points to a non existent file.  Must have been removed.</p>
<p>Did you do yours via Windows Update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129590</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129590</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129563&quot;&gt;OldManDeath wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;It appears there is no full file so you can do multiple computers like you could with the RC, and you have to do this through Windows Update.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Well, there is a full download available, just not by Microsoft. It just takes some searching around. I&#039;ll just say to search for Windows6.0-KB936330-X86-wave0.exe ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129563">OldManDeath wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>It appears there is no full file so you can do multiple computers like you could with the RC, and you have to do this through Windows Update.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Well, there is a full download available, just not by Microsoft. It just takes some searching around. I&#8217;ll just say to search for Windows6.0-KB936330-X86-wave0.exe <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dobrofsky</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129569</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dobrofsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129569</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129539&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ryan wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129530&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vincent wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Good to hear that the file transfer is faster. For the life of me, I don’t understand in this day and age of large files, how MS could release an OS that had slow file transfers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;The only thing that comes to mind is that they never substantially tested file transfer speeds against XP. Naturally you would think that they would test everything, but that’s never possible.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

No, they would&#039;ve known. They just had a date to hit and couldn&#039;t afford to do a thing about it. I worked for a similar company that had promised dates to hit and trust me, they are aware of all the bugs :) But whatever doesn&#039;t get fixed in time, is just......tough. &quot;We&#039;ll get it on the next ver.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129539" rel="nofollow">Ryan wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129530" rel="nofollow">Vincent wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Good to hear that the file transfer is faster. For the life of me, I don’t understand in this day and age of large files, how MS could release an OS that had slow file transfers.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>The only thing that comes to mind is that they never substantially tested file transfer speeds against XP. Naturally you would think that they would test everything, but that’s never possible.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>No, they would&#8217;ve known. They just had a date to hit and couldn&#8217;t afford to do a thing about it. I worked for a similar company that had promised dates to hit and trust me, they are aware of all the bugs <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  But whatever doesn&#8217;t get fixed in time, is just&#8230;&#8230;tough. &#8220;We&#8217;ll get it on the next ver.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dobrofsky</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129568</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dobrofsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129568</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129530&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vincent wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Good to hear that the file transfer is faster. For the life of me, I don’t understand in this day and age of large files, how MS could release an OS that had slow file transfers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

Because they have the market by the balls, that&#039;s why :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129530" rel="nofollow">Vincent wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Good to hear that the file transfer is faster. For the life of me, I don’t understand in this day and age of large files, how MS could release an OS that had slow file transfers.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Because they have the market by the balls, that&#8217;s why <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldManDeath</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129563</link>
		<dc:creator>OldManDeath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129563</guid>
		<description>It appears there is no full file so you can do multiple computers like you could with the RC, and you have to do this through Windows Update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears there is no full file so you can do multiple computers like you could with the RC, and you have to do this through Windows Update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129539</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129539</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-129530&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vincent wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Good to hear that the file transfer is faster. For the life of me, I don’t understand in this day and age of large files, how MS could release an OS that had slow file transfers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
The only thing that comes to mind is that they never substantially tested file transfer speeds against XP. Naturally you would think that they would test everything, but that&#039;s never possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-129530" rel="nofollow">Vincent wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Good to hear that the file transfer is faster. For the life of me, I don’t understand in this day and age of large files, how MS could release an OS that had slow file transfers.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>The only thing that comes to mind is that they never substantially tested file transfer speeds against XP. Naturally you would think that they would test everything, but that&#8217;s never possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129530</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129530</guid>
		<description>Good to hear that the file transfer is faster. For the life of me, I don&#039;t understand in this day and age of large files, how MS could release an OS that had slow file transfers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear that the file transfer is faster. For the life of me, I don&#8217;t understand in this day and age of large files, how MS could release an OS that had slow file transfers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hunashaman</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/comment-page-1/#comment-129529</link>
		<dc:creator>hunashaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/2008/01/14/download-vista-sp1-rc-refresh-60600117028/#comment-129529</guid>
		<description>I agree. The refresh of SP1 definitely speeds things up substantially. Apart from faster transfers my desktop just has a snappier feel to it. Documents open faster, etc. Another thing I have noticed is that my internet connection seems faster. I&#039;m not sure whether that is part of what SP1 is supposed to do but websites definitely load faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. The refresh of SP1 definitely speeds things up substantially. Apart from faster transfers my desktop just has a snappier feel to it. Documents open faster, etc. Another thing I have noticed is that my internet connection seems faster. I&#8217;m not sure whether that is part of what SP1 is supposed to do but websites definitely load faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
