<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easier Tagging System Comes to Google&#8217;s Picasa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-143040</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15181#comment-143040</guid>
		<description>Bill:
Yeah that helped, I found out I&#039;d need ACDSee Pro  :? Then I found out I could do it with Bridge too, and also Lightroom, in an easier, faster way too. Happy with that for now :)

Ashley:
Sure is a long, tedious process! Especially those years, as I have much more digital/digitized pics there. I definitely think it&#039;s worth it, as I already love being able to find/show/share photos by tag on Flickr (locally I&#039;m starting to appreciate it too).

Ryan:
Ah, no Mac here, so I&#039;ll do with LR or Bridge for now then. Face recognition would be very welcome in those apps too (or on Flickr, but that probably won&#039;t potentially sync back to the local files, while I imagine Picasa will at some point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:<br />
Yeah that helped, I found out I&#8217;d need ACDSee Pro  <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' />  Then I found out I could do it with Bridge too, and also Lightroom, in an easier, faster way too. Happy with that for now <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ashley:<br />
Sure is a long, tedious process! Especially those years, as I have much more digital/digitized pics there. I definitely think it&#8217;s worth it, as I already love being able to find/show/share photos by tag on Flickr (locally I&#8217;m starting to appreciate it too).</p>
<p>Ryan:<br />
Ah, no Mac here, so I&#8217;ll do with LR or Bridge for now then. Face recognition would be very welcome in those apps too (or on Flickr, but that probably won&#8217;t potentially sync back to the local files, while I imagine Picasa will at some point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-143019</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15181#comment-143019</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-142983&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Ryan, did you ever write an article about that? I’m using Exifer to apply the (IPTC) tags locally, which usually get picked up by Flickr Uploadr, but not always. I’m trying to find a better method of applying tags to photos and have them come up in all (online) applications I’m using.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I&#039;m using iPhoto to apply all of my tags, and then have a Flickr uploading app that integrates into iPhoto which applies tags as they are uploaded. It was a very tedious process, but well worth it when I look back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-142983" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Ryan, did you ever write an article about that? I’m using Exifer to apply the (IPTC) tags locally, which usually get picked up by Flickr Uploadr, but not always. I’m trying to find a better method of applying tags to photos and have them come up in all (online) applications I’m using.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;m using iPhoto to apply all of my tags, and then have a Flickr uploading app that integrates into iPhoto which applies tags as they are uploaded. It was a very tedious process, but well worth it when I look back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-143017</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15181#comment-143017</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-142983&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Change wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Sounds promising. I’m working on the same thing Ryan was working on right now. Still have to go through 2004 - 2008 :P 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
It&#039;s a long, tedious process, isn&#039;t it?&lt;div class=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-142977&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jack of all Trades wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;we all know how the first face recognition service ended up (Riya).
and i do wish there new likeness service will do something more useful soon.
but since google has more resources, does it mean we will soon see more automated recognition of other things?
i wonder.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
A more automated tagging system is definitely a step in the right direction. I think we&#039;ll see a lot more of this automation coming soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-142983" rel="nofollow">Change wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>Sounds promising. I’m working on the same thing Ryan was working on right now. Still have to go through 2004 &#8211; 2008 <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s a long, tedious process, isn&#8217;t it?
<div class="commentquote"><a href="#comment-142977" rel="nofollow">Jack of all Trades wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>we all know how the first face recognition service ended up (Riya).<br />
and i do wish there new likeness service will do something more useful soon.<br />
but since google has more resources, does it mean we will soon see more automated recognition of other things?<br />
i wonder.
</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>A more automated tagging system is definitely a step in the right direction. I think we&#8217;ll see a lot more of this automation coming soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-143015</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15181#comment-143015</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this helps, but there&#039;s an ACDSee forum topic on what I think you&#039;re referring to here - http://forums.acdsystems.com/index.php?showtopic=3220

It states:
&quot;Use the &quot;batch set information&quot; under the batch command, you can then set the catorgories and key words in the database to write a IPTC to the file.&quot;

I don&#039;t blame you on not wanting to do it twice, that&#039;s why I use it for retaining Fotki tags. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this helps, but there&#8217;s an ACDSee forum topic on what I think you&#8217;re referring to here &#8211; [<a href='http://forums.acdsystems.com/index.php?showtopic=3220' rel='nofollow'>forums.acdsystems.com</a>]</p>
<p>It states:<br />
&#8220;Use the &#8220;batch set information&#8221; under the batch command, you can then set the catorgories and key words in the database to write a IPTC to the file.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame you on not wanting to do it twice, that&#8217;s why I use it for retaining Fotki tags. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-143014</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15181#comment-143014</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to use ACDSee for tagging, but I couldn&#039;t find a way to easily mass-edit photos with IPTC keywords. These are the only keywords Flickr understands for their tags (and I prefer not to do the work twice :P).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to use ACDSee for tagging, but I couldn&#8217;t find a way to easily mass-edit photos with IPTC keywords. These are the only keywords Flickr understands for their tags (and I prefer not to do the work twice <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-143002</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15181#comment-143002</guid>
		<description>I use ACDSee for my tagging needs.  In total, I have about 14k photos tagged.  Besides all of the advanced features ACDSee has, it offers a few most other photo management apps don&#039;t, the ability to do both AND and OR searches, as well as the ability to write your tags to EXIF info or vice versa.  It&#039;ll let you map what &quot;fields&quot; they go into.  I use that so my uploaded photos are tagged when going to Fotki.  It&#039;ll also let you export all of your tagging work to a standard XML file which should make it easier to switch photo apps if you choose to do so at a later date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use ACDSee for my tagging needs.  In total, I have about 14k photos tagged.  Besides all of the advanced features ACDSee has, it offers a few most other photo management apps don&#8217;t, the ability to do both AND and OR searches, as well as the ability to write your tags to EXIF info or vice versa.  It&#8217;ll let you map what &#8220;fields&#8221; they go into.  I use that so my uploaded photos are tagged when going to Fotki.  It&#8217;ll also let you export all of your tagging work to a standard XML file which should make it easier to switch photo apps if you choose to do so at a later date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Change</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-142983</link>
		<dc:creator>Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15181#comment-142983</guid>
		<description>Sounds promising. I&#039;m working on the same thing Ryan was working on right now. Still have to go through 2004 - 2008 :P

Ryan, did you ever write an article about that? I&#039;m using Exifer to apply the (IPTC) tags locally, which usually get picked up by Flickr Uploadr, but not always. I&#039;m trying to find a better method of applying tags to photos and have them come up in all (online) applications I&#039;m using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds promising. I&#8217;m working on the same thing Ryan was working on right now. Still have to go through 2004 &#8211; 2008 <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ryan, did you ever write an article about that? I&#8217;m using Exifer to apply the (IPTC) tags locally, which usually get picked up by Flickr Uploadr, but not always. I&#8217;m trying to find a better method of applying tags to photos and have them come up in all (online) applications I&#8217;m using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack of all Trades</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/easier-tagging-system-comes-to-googles-picasa/comment-page-1/#comment-142977</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack of all Trades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cybernetnews.com/?p=15181#comment-142977</guid>
		<description>we all know how the first face recognition service ended up (Riya).
and i do wish there new likeness service will do something more useful soon.
but since google has more resources, does it mean we will soon see more automated recognition of other things?
i wonder.
microsoft, and i think at least another company, working on automated location recognition, not with GPS, but with features like building and such.
that, and objects and color tagging will b cool 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we all know how the first face recognition service ended up (Riya).<br />
and i do wish there new likeness service will do something more useful soon.<br />
but since google has more resources, does it mean we will soon see more automated recognition of other things?<br />
i wonder.<br />
microsoft, and i think at least another company, working on automated location recognition, not with GPS, but with features like building and such.<br />
that, and objects and color tagging will b cool 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
