<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eset Takes NOD32 Antivirus Scanner Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/</link>
	<description>Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:29:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: moh</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/comment-page-1/#comment-149190</link>
		<dc:creator>moh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-149190</guid>
		<description>i think good prog.if continued with best scan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think good prog.if continued with best scan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: motang</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/comment-page-1/#comment-100145</link>
		<dc:creator>motang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100145</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t work in Firefox...oh well! Nice find though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t work in Firefox&#8230;oh well! Nice find though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/comment-page-1/#comment-100117</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100117</guid>
		<description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-100082&quot;&gt;CoryC wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;When you tell you non-tech savvy friends about this it’s important to tell them that the online version will not keep viruses off their system.  It will only identify viruses already on their machine.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Thanks for the heads up Cory, I didn&#039;t think about mentioning that since it is obvious to me.

&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-100091&quot;&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;would this work in Linux?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Nope, no Linux. It requires Internet Explorer with ActiveX so this is going to be Windows only.

&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-100113&quot;&gt;Tinhed wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
I love Active Virus Shield as well, it&#039;s fast and effective. I&#039;m sure the only reason Eset is using Internet Explorer is because they can easily transform their program into an ActiveX application, so a Firefox-compatible version probably won&#039;t be emerging anytime soon. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-100082">CoryC wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>When you tell you non-tech savvy friends about this it’s important to tell them that the online version will not keep viruses off their system.  It will only identify viruses already on their machine.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Thanks for the heads up Cory, I didn&#8217;t think about mentioning that since it is obvious to me.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-100091">Anonymous wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>would this work in Linux?</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Nope, no Linux. It requires Internet Explorer with ActiveX so this is going to be Windows only.</p>
<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-100113">Tinhed wrote:</a><br />
<blockquote>I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>I love Active Virus Shield as well, it&#8217;s fast and effective. I&#8217;m sure the only reason Eset is using Internet Explorer is because they can easily transform their program into an ActiveX application, so a Firefox-compatible version probably won&#8217;t be emerging anytime soon. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/comment-page-1/#comment-100113</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 05:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100113</guid>
		<description>Well Eset has gone down the same track as Kaspersky labs did with their online sacnner

1. Internet Explorer.
2. ActiveX control
3. MB&#039;s of download.

I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Eset has gone down the same track as Kaspersky labs did with their online sacnner</p>
<p>1. Internet Explorer.<br />
2. ActiveX control<br />
3. MB&#8217;s of download.</p>
<p>I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinhed</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/comment-page-1/#comment-100112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 05:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100112</guid>
		<description>Well Eset has gone down the same track as Kaspersky labs did with their online sacnner

1. Internet Explorer.
2. ActiveX control
3. MB&#039;s of download.

I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Eset has gone down the same track as Kaspersky labs did with their online sacnner</p>
<p>1. Internet Explorer.<br />
2. ActiveX control<br />
3. MB&#8217;s of download.</p>
<p>I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/comment-page-1/#comment-100091</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100091</guid>
		<description>would this work in Linux?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would this work in Linux?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoryC</title>
		<link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/comment-page-1/#comment-100082</link>
		<dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100082</guid>
		<description>When you tell you non-tech savvy friends about this it&#039;s important to tell them that the online version will not keep viruses off their system.  It will only identify viruses already on their machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you tell you non-tech savvy friends about this it&#8217;s important to tell them that the online version will not keep viruses off their system.  It will only identify viruses already on their machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
