<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Eset Takes NOD32 Antivirus Scanner Online</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 23:23:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: moh</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-149190</link> <dc:creator>moh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:59:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-149190</guid> <description>i think good prog.if continued with best scan.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think good prog.if continued with best scan.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: motang</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100145</link> <dc:creator>motang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:32:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100145</guid> <description>Doesn&#039;t work in Firefox...oh well! Nice find though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t work in Firefox&#8230;oh well! Nice find though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100117</link> <dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:08:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100117</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-100082&quot;&gt;CoryC wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;When you tell you non-tech savvy friends about this it’s important to tell them that the online version will not keep viruses off their system.  It will only identify viruses already on their machine.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Thanks for the heads up Cory, I didn&#039;t think about mentioning that since it is obvious to me.&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-100091&quot;&gt;Anonymous wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;would this work in Linux?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Nope, no Linux. It requires Internet Explorer with ActiveX so this is going to be Windows only.&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-100113&quot;&gt;Tinhed wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; I love Active Virus Shield as well, it&#039;s fast and effective. I&#039;m sure the only reason Eset is using Internet Explorer is because they can easily transform their program into an ActiveX application, so a Firefox-compatible version probably won&#039;t be emerging anytime soon. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-100082">CoryC wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>When you tell you non-tech savvy friends about this it’s important to tell them that the online version will not keep viruses off their system.  It will only identify viruses already on their machine.</p></blockquote></div><p>Thanks for the heads up Cory, I didn&#8217;t think about mentioning that since it is obvious to me.</p><div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-100091">Anonymous wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>would this work in Linux?</p></blockquote></div><p>Nope, no Linux. It requires Internet Explorer with ActiveX so this is going to be Windows only.</p><div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-100113">Tinhed wrote:</a><br /><blockquote>I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</p></blockquote></div><p>I love Active Virus Shield as well, it&#8217;s fast and effective. I&#8217;m sure the only reason Eset is using Internet Explorer is because they can easily transform their program into an ActiveX application, so a Firefox-compatible version probably won&#8217;t be emerging anytime soon. <img src='http://cybernetnews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tinhed</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100113</link> <dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 05:36:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100113</guid> <description>Well Eset has gone down the same track as Kaspersky labs did with their online sacnner1. Internet Explorer. 2. ActiveX control 3. MB&#039;s of download.I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Eset has gone down the same track as Kaspersky labs did with their online sacnner</p><p>1. Internet Explorer.<br /> 2. ActiveX control<br /> 3. MB&#8217;s of download.</p><p>I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tinhed</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100112</link> <dc:creator>Tinhed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 05:35:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100112</guid> <description>Well Eset has gone down the same track as Kaspersky labs did with their online sacnner1. Internet Explorer. 2. ActiveX control 3. MB&#039;s of download.I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Eset has gone down the same track as Kaspersky labs did with their online sacnner</p><p>1. Internet Explorer.<br /> 2. ActiveX control<br /> 3. MB&#8217;s of download.</p><p>I am happy with my Active Virus Shield.Does its job well. If they make it work in Firefox, i would definitely use it as a second line of defence.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100091</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 22:16:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100091</guid> <description>would this work in Linux?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would this work in Linux?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CoryC</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100082</link> <dc:creator>CoryC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:21:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2007/07/05/eset-takes-nod32-antivirus-scanner-online/#comment-100082</guid> <description>When you tell you non-tech savvy friends about this it&#039;s important to tell them that the online version will not keep viruses off their system.  It will only identify viruses already on their machine.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you tell you non-tech savvy friends about this it&#8217;s important to tell them that the online version will not keep viruses off their system.  It will only identify viruses already on their machine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 269/290 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-05-26 21:11:57 -->
