<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Fasterfox 2.0 Released &#8211; Compatible With Firefox 2</title> <atom:link href="http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/</link> <description>Technology News</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Hemant</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-31414</link> <dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 05:32:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/31/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-31414</guid> <description>Average Performance</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Average Performance</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kumar</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-31412</link> <dc:creator>Kumar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 05:22:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/31/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-31412</guid> <description>Ya they must be banned</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya they must be banned</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-31411</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 05:20:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/31/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-31411</guid> <description>&lt;div id=&quot;commentquote&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-30776&quot;&gt;Tom wrote:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;but I donâ€™t notice any tremendous speed improvements when loading websites.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Same here. It did improve loading websites in the earlier versions, but i don&#039;t see any changes in FF2.0&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Same here</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="commentquote"><a href="#comment-30776">Tom wrote:</a><br /><blockquote><blockquote>but I donâ€™t notice any tremendous speed improvements when loading websites.</p></blockquote><p>Same here. It did improve loading websites in the earlier versions, but i don&#8217;t see any changes in FF2.0</p></blockquote></div><p>Same here</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ffextensionguru</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-30898</link> <dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:36:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/31/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-30898</guid> <description>Wasn&#039;t too impressed with the first version and likely won&#039;t bother with this version.  The only sites that load slow are because of their crappy servers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t too impressed with the first version and likely won&#8217;t bother with this version.  The only sites that load slow are because of their crappy servers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fog</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-30876</link> <dc:creator>fog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/31/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-30876</guid> <description>I think only real difference is, that you can get banned, if you use Turbo Charged. Some servers do not like it, that is what kb.mozillazine.org says and tweakguides.com http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server http://www.tweakguides.com/Firefox_9.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think only real difference is, that you can get banned, if you use Turbo Charged.<br /> Some servers do not like it, that is what kb.mozillazine.org says and tweakguides.com<br /> [<a href='http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server' rel='nofollow'>kb.mozillazine.org</a>]<br /> [<a href='http://www.tweakguides.com/Firefox_9.html' rel='nofollow'>tweakguides.com</a>]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed West</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-30837</link> <dc:creator>Ed West</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:34:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/31/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-30837</guid> <description>Tried it once. Wasn&#039;t impressed. However, Fox 2.0 is bringing in pages quicker than it&#039;s previous version for me. I especially noticed my Google personalized page is much quicker.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried it once. Wasn&#8217;t impressed. However, Fox 2.0 is bringing in pages quicker than it&#8217;s previous version for me. I especially noticed my Google personalized page is much quicker.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://cybernetnews.com/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-30776</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.cybernetnews.com/2006/10/31/fasterfox-20-released-compatible-with-firefox-2/#comment-30776</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;but I donâ€™t notice any tremendous speed improvements when loading websites.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Same here. It did improve loading websites in the earlier versions, but i don&#039;t see any changes in FF2.0</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>but I donâ€™t notice any tremendous speed improvements when loading websites.</p></blockquote><p>Same here. It did improve loading websites in the earlier versions, but i don&#8217;t see any changes in FF2.0</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 259/278 objects using disk: basic

Served from: cybernetnews.com @ 2012-02-13 06:48:21 -->
